6 minutes ago, WhiteWall said:

We're not out of the woods yet.

Having said that we won't let Fernandez go without be able to strengthen it looks like we have done exactly that and are currently coming up short on replacements with no likely candidates. And then, if our midfield wasn't thin enough we have now moved Essugo out to Strasbourg on loan because of no other takers.

We’ve 100% got someone (Camara) but hopefully 2 (MGW) lined up already, just dotting i’s and crossing t’s.

Remember when we were linked all deadline day with Smith-Rowe and then signed Palmer out the blue. How the Rogers deal happened in the space of about 2 minutes.

I’ve been sceptical and critical of these lot but this window is starting to show they might not be as clueless as first suspected.

1 hour ago, Frawdulant said:

This’ll be a long post but I’ve been chatting with ChatGPT about the 4 players we’re linked with as a replacement and I thought the response was interesting so I’m sharing.

My prompt: And given the Chelsea team that Xabi Alonso has put together this season who do you think best completes that team in place of Enzo Fernandez? I’m not ask who is most like Enzo but rather which player best improves the Chelsea team when considering playing next to Caicedo and having Palmer, Rogers and Pedro ahead of them up top

Yes — this changes my answer quite significantly.

If the question is no longer “who is the best midfielder?” but:

“Who makes this specific Chelsea team better alongside Caicedo, with Palmer, Rogers and João Pedro ahead of them?”

then I would take Manu Koné.

And I think it’s a fairly clear choice.

Chelsea’s current setup under Xabi Alonso is essentially built around a 3-4-2-1/3-4-3, with Palmer and Rogers operating behind João Pedro. Alonso has explicitly said that trio is something he wants to build around, and the early matches have shown how much freedom they’re being given. 

That means I don’t think Chelsea need another midfielder whose primary job is to create.

They need someone who makes it possible for those three to create without worrying about what’s behind them.

My answer: Manu Koné

I’d rank the four specifically for this Chelsea team:

🥇 Manu Koné

🥈 Lamine Camara

🥉 Adam Wharton

4️⃣ Alex Scott

And the reasons are quite different from my previous ceiling ranking.

The key is Caicedo

This is the crucial bit.

If you already have Caicedo, I don’t think you want to duplicate what he does.

Caicedo is an outstanding defensive midfielder: covering ground, winning the ball, defending transitions, pressing, tackling and recovering possession.

So I’d want his partner to answer:

“What does Chelsea need when Caicedo has won the ball?”

And that’s where Koné becomes extremely attractive.

He can receive under pressure, turn, carry through midfield and physically advance the team.

So imagine:

CB → Caicedo wins it → Koné carries → Palmer/Rogers receive

That’s an extremely powerful transition.

Why I wouldn’t choose Wharton

This is the really interesting one.

If Chelsea didn’t have Caicedo, I’d be very tempted by Wharton.

But alongside Caicedo?

I’m less convinced.

Wharton would give you:

Caicedo + elite distribution

which is fantastic.

But you’d still have a midfield that relies quite heavily on passing to progress the ball.

And then look at what’s ahead of them:

Palmer — Rogers
João Pedro

You don’t need to add another primary creator.

Those three already have absurd amounts of technical quality and imagination. Alonso’s whole idea is to give them freedom and responsibility. 

What you need behind them is someone who says:

“Don’t worry. I’ve got the physical side of this.”

That’s Koné.

Why Koné + Caicedo is so interesting

This is the partnership I’d want to see.

Caicedo

Defensive intelligence
↓
wins/recycles possession
↓
covers space

Koné

receives
↓
resists pressure
↓
carries 15–30 yards
↓
releases Palmer/Rogers

They’re complementary rather than duplicative.

And Koné’s physical profile is exactly what I’d want behind Chelsea’s attacking four.

He’s powerful enough to defend transitions but technically good enough that Chelsea aren’t sacrificing possession to get that physicality.

His recent international data illustrates the combination: UEFA has him at 96.25% passing accuracy across his current European-qualifying appearances, alongside 10 tackles and 15 recoveries. 

Camara is the fascinating alternative

Actually, Camara is probably the player I’d choose if I wanted the most technically balanced midfield.

You could have:

Caicedo — Camara

and Camara gives you a little bit of everything:

• progressive passing

• ball carrying

• defensive work

• pressing

• creativity

• ability to play deeper or higher

And unlike Wharton, he doesn’t need the game to be organised around him.

That’s a really important quality when you’ve already got Palmer and Rogers demanding creative responsibility.

But I still prefer Koné.

Why?

Because I think Chelsea’s biggest potential weakness with that front three is transition defence.

Palmer and Rogers are going to take risks.

João Pedro is going to roam.

The wing-backs are going to push forward.

Suddenly you’ve got:

Palmer
Rogers
João Pedro
wing-back
wing-back

ahead of your midfield.

You need somebody who can put out fires.

Koné is built for that.

And Scott?

Scott is actually the player I’d be least interested in for Chelsea.

Not because he’s worse than the others.

It’s because Chelsea already have Caicedo’s running and defensive intensity.

Scott would give you another excellent athlete, but he doesn’t add enough of something that Chelsea desperately lack.

Koné gives you the ability to break pressure by carrying.

Camara gives you technical versatility.

Wharton gives you elite distribution.

Scott gives you more running.

Of those four, that’s the least valuable addition to this particular XI.

Here’s how I see the four partnerships

Caicedo + Wharton

The controller partnership

🟢 Excellent possession
🟢 Excellent defensive reading
🟢 Brilliant passing
🟢 Controls games

🔴 Less physically imposing
🔴 Less dynamic ball carrying
🔴 Potentially too conservative behind Palmer/Rogers

This would be fantastic against a team sitting deep.

Caicedo + Camara

The complete partnership

🟢 Very balanced
🟢 Excellent defensively
🟢 Good carrying
🟢 Good passing
🟢 Lots of tactical flexibility

🔴 Doesn’t have one truly elite complementary speciality

This might actually be the safest pairing.

Caicedo + Koné

The f**king nightmare partnership

🟢 Physical
🟢 Press resistant
🟢 Ball winning
🟢 Ball carrying
🟢 Transition protection
🟢 Can defend huge spaces
🟢 Can progress the ball himself

And crucially:

neither needs to be the team’s chief creator.

That’s what I love about it.

You could basically tell them:

“Win the midfield. Get the ball to the three monsters in front of you.”

And let Palmer, Rogers and João Pedro cook.

Caicedo + Scott

The engine-room partnership

🟢 Relentless
🟢 Excellent pressing
🟢 Great physical coverage
🟢 Good transition defence

🔴 Less creativity
🔴 Less press resistance
🔴 Less progressive passing
🔴 Less ability to break a press through individual quality

I think Chelsea would become extremely energetic but potentially a little blunt.

And there’s another reason I love Koné here

Look at what Alonso is trying to create.

His Chelsea isn’t simply trying to dominate possession for the sake of it. The Palmer/Rogers combination is designed to be unpredictable and aggressive, with Rogers particularly valuable because he can carry the ball and break lines from the half-space. The Premier League specifically identified him as an ideal fit for Alonso’s 3-4-2-1 because of his ball-carrying and No.10/winger hybrid qualities. 

So I’d want the midfield to be functional rather than ornamental.

This is very interesting, although I am not sure if his fitness record has been taken into account. I'm interested why it was limited to the four main players linked on the Internet. I'd be interested in knowing what wider search would bring up. Zubimendi, Fabian Ruiz, Camavinga or another one that I personally like James Garner who already has prem experience

6 minutes ago, The Boehly Babes said:

We’ve 100% got someone (Camara) but hopefully 2 (MGW) lined up already, just dotting i’s and crossing t’s.

Remember when we were linked all deadline day with Smith-Rowe and then signed Palmer out the blue. How the Rogers deal happened in the space of about 2 minutes.

I’ve been sceptical and critical of these lot but this window is starting to show they might not be as clueless as first suspected.

Have we 100% got Camara? I read that it was dead in the water.

From Wharton, to Scott, to Zubimendi, to Kone, to Camara, and now they've somehow talked themselves into being satisfied with a midfield that currently has Malo Gusto and a brittle Lavia on the pitch.

Looks like our buisness is done. Poor end to great window.

Weaker in midfield, and praying on the fitness of James and Lavia. Caicedo hopefully available every game.

Brighton agree deal for Chema Andres. Should just hijack that. Very promising player, Alonso knows him from Castilla. Cheap deal. Reassess in january

27 minutes ago, big blue said:

Looks like our buisness is done. Poor end to great window.

Weaker in midfield, and praying on the fitness of James and Lavia. Caicedo hopefully available every game.

It's annoying. It really is. Especially with how weak every club is.

I stand by that Wharton or a top CM would've genuinely had us challenging.

Now we are seemingly content with having a midfield that completed only 20 passes against Brighton last weekend.