6 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Nope. Too late. They made their bed. Lie in it.

I hope Garnacho continues to be sh*t so both directors are held accountable. They spent months, MONTHS, trying to get this guy when all evidence showed he'd be terrible. Acting like a bunch of goons twerking for his only fans the way they behaved in trying to secure him. Two transfer windows they circled jerked for this twat.

I have the perfect analogy for this c**t. It's like you're walking down a street and you step in dog sh*t. What are you going to do? You are going to remove your shoe/clean the sh*t. The directors? They are going to take off the their shoe and smell it. Any normal person wouldn't do that because its going to smell like sh*t. The directors? Nah. They need to smell sh*t to really know its sh*t.

They even got FOS to remind themselves of it

Its Fking Sh*t

25 minutes ago, markpitts said:

"Chelsea are concerned about Garnacho’s performances. There were issues with him during his time at Man United that it seems are coming up again now at Chelsea, both on and off the pitch. He never looked completely committed on the pitch, he’s not the sort of player to get his head down, work hard and battle to get into a game. And in the final third, he’s wasteful, he’s not giving anywhere near the end product you would hope for a player who was bought for £40million."

What is crazy is any casual football could have described Garnacho to a tee as above, a year in and I can’t see any improvement. He is on one of those death row contracts till 2032, so I don’t see how you can shift him.

I am not sure I agree with this assessment.

He tries a lot and doesn't give up which is why his failures are so prominent.

29 minutes ago, markpitts said:

"Chelsea are concerned about Garnacho’s performances. There were issues with him during his time at Man United that it seems are coming up again now at Chelsea, both on and off the pitch. He never looked completely committed on the pitch, he’s not the sort of player to get his head down, work hard and battle to get into a game. And in the final third, he’s wasteful, he’s not giving anywhere near the end product you would hope for a player who was bought for £40million."

What is crazy is any casual football could have described Garnacho to a tee as above, a year in and I can’t see any improvement. He is on one of those death row contracts till 2032, so I don’t see how you can shift him.

Seriously Mark, do you know the source of this comment? No way this comes from the groomed corridors of the PR merchants at CFC.LDN. THe middle sentence looks like an Overlap assessment from Gary Neville. Not that i don't think he's crap either though, to be clear.

15 hours ago, markpitts said:

What is crazy is any casual football could have described Garnacho to a tee as above, a year in and I can’t see any improvement. He is on one of those death row contracts till 2032, so I don’t see how you can shift him.

15 hours ago, Sconnie Blue said:

They spent months, MONTHS, trying to get this guy when all evidence showed he'd be terrible. Acting like a bunch of goons twerking for his only fans the way they behaved in trying to secure him. Two transfer windows they circled jerked for this twat.

Let's revisit what they released to the usual suspects in the press earlier this season:

Matt Law, The Telegraph:
Chelsea have no concerns over the character of transfer target Alejandro Garnacho after carrying out a series of background checks on the out-of-favour Manchester United winger.

Sam Cohen, GiveMeSport:
Alejandro Garnacho is settling into life at Chelsea well, GIVEMESPORT understands, with early signs suggesting he is adapting quickly both on and off the pitch.
Since his move from Manchester United in the summer, the 21-year-old has impressed those around the club with his energy and professionalism, though sources also stress that it is still very much an adjustment period as he gets used to head coach Enzo Maresca’s system and expectations.

BlueCo PR is the best since Baghdad Bob.

The crazy thing is, I don't even blame Garnacho fully here. How the f**k is he meant to be held accountable, when the people he's supposed to look up to are Pedro Neto and Enzo Fernandez?

Edited March 26Mar 26 by SydneyChelsea

River Plate manager Eduardo Coudet has made contact with Alejandro Garnacho. Chelsea would look favourably on a one-year loan to Argentina.

This would be a wild move but can remember something in the press a few weeks ago about loaning players to that league. Paez is already at River Plate, but it will be something else loaning Garnacho.

8 hours ago, markpitts said:

River Plate manager Eduardo Coudet has made contact with Alejandro Garnacho. Chelsea would look favourably on a one-year loan to Argentina.

This would be a wild move but can remember something in the press a few weeks ago about loaning players to that league. Paez is already at River Plate, but it will be something else loaning Garnacho.

Clearly something has finally broken behind the scenes. This, to me, feels like appeasement to the manager.

We've recently been hearing snippets that his previous attitude and body language issues that he had at Man Utd have resurfaced (who'd have thought?). Maybe this is giving the manager what he wants by getting a bad influence out of the dressing room.

This is the problem with an AI, data driven, recruitment policy. Grok or Claude can't tell you if the bloke is a knobhead.

Garnacho G/A every 161 minutes for us including a double against Arsenal.

Neto G/A every 190 minutes for us this season with every goal coming against league one opposition or relegation fodder.

If Garnacho is off to River Plate, surely Neto has to go to Cowdenbeath?

3 hours ago, WhiteWall said:

Clearly something has finally broken behind the scenes. This, to me, feels like appeasement to the manager.

We've recently been hearing snippets that his previous attitude and body language issues that he had at Man Utd have resurfaced (who'd have thought?). Maybe this is giving the manager what he wants by getting a bad influence out of the dressing room.

This is the problem with an AI, data driven, recruitment policy. Grok or Claude can't tell you if the bloke is a knobhead.

Have we? Where and/or who from?

2 hours ago, GarnachoCheese said:

Garnacho G/A every 161 minutes for us including a double against Arsenal.

Neto G/A every 190 minutes for us this season with every goal coming against league one opposition or relegation fodder.

If Garnacho is off to River Plate, surely Neto has to go to Cowdenbeath?

both can go piss ona electric fence in nowhere land as far as im concerned.

19 minutes ago, bluelightening said:

both can go piss ona electric fence in nowhere land as far as im concerned.

They would miss.

Said it before - will say it again, I like Garnacho. He has something about him. A little bit of arrogance, a self belief, a face that annoys opposition fans....

he is not afraid to have a go and try. His output can be better, but alongside Palmer and Stevo, he is the one player in our team who will try something flamboyant.

Miles ahead of Gittens, and for me, much better than Neto is is epitome of patchy/streaky - and never seems to do it in big games.

9 minutes ago, nonotnowjim said:

Said it before - will say it again, I like Garnacho. He has something about him. A little bit of arrogance, a self belief, a face that annoys opposition fans....

he is not afraid to have a go and try. His output can be better, but alongside Palmer and Stevo, he is the one player in our team who will try something flamboyant.

Miles ahead of Gittens, and for me, much better than Neto is is epitome of patchy/streaky - and never seems to do it in big games.

Which shoe do you want to cover in dog sh*t today, Garnacho or Neto. Both are f**king awful footballers...

Fernandez is the player with a punchable face, filthy man... We're essentiall stuffed full of manchildren spoilt brats... f**king starting to hate most of the team.

All the above you said could be said for Tyrick George about flair, arrogance and self belief or not afraid of giving it a go... and he didnt cost the club 100 million. Wish this kid replaces either of the brain dead runts mentioned above. Club is awash with mediocrity and its starting to seep into the fanbase.

2 hours ago, dermott said:

Have we? Where and/or who from?

2 hours ago, dermott said:

Have we? Where and/or who from?

I thought i saw it being mentioned, on twitter or even that Alex Crook fella on Talksport that it was rumoured that Garnacho was the "mole" responsible for the dressing room leaks. No idea if any of it is true though, and in fact i don't believe a single thing that emanates from this club, good or bad, any more, as the entire place is riddled with briefings and disinformation

1 hour ago, WhiteWall said:

I thought i saw it being mentioned, on twitter or even that Alex Crook fella on Talksport that it was rumoured that Garnacho was the "mole" responsible for the dressing room leaks. No idea if any of it is true though, and in fact i don't believe a single thing that emanates from this club, good or bad, any more, as the entire place is riddled with briefings and disinformation

So about on a par with Talksport for credibility.

5 hours ago, dermott said:

So about on a par with Talksport for credibility.

Agreed. Also doesn't mean it's not true with this sh*thouse club now.

On 09/04/2026 at 08:11, WhiteWall said:

I thought i saw it being mentioned, on twitter or even that Alex Crook fella on Talksport that it was rumoured that Garnacho was the "mole" responsible for the dressing room leaks. No idea if any of it is true though, and in fact i don't believe a single thing that emanates from this club, good or bad, any more, as the entire place is riddled with briefings and disinformation

Well, the mole at Man United disappeared when Garnacho moved to Chelsea. Then Chelsea had a mole. It could of course just be a coincidence.

On 11/04/2026 at 15:12, TheCeleryKing said:

Well, the mole at Man United disappeared when Garnacho moved to Chelsea. Then Chelsea had a mole. It could of course just be a coincidence.

The mole was confirmed as Pedro Neto.

3 hours ago, GarnachoCheese said:

The mole was confirmed as Pedro Neto.

Fake news. Pedro Neto didn't play for Man United so he couldn't be the mole at Man United.

4 hours ago, TheCeleryKing said:

Fake news. Pedro Neto didn't play for Man United so he couldn't be the mole at Man United.

I’m talking about Chelsea bud. I don’t support Utd so don’t care what happens there, each to their own though

8 hours ago, GarnachoCheese said:

The mole was confirmed as Pedro Neto.

By who? Was this on Talksport? Darkweb?

3 minutes ago, forbzy said:

By who? Was this on Talksport? Darkweb?

It’s confirmed

1 hour ago, GarnachoCheese said:

It’s confirmed

Do you have a link? I never saw anything about this in the media. If so, I would have expected him to have been dropped like Enzo.

18 minutes ago, forbzy said:

Do you have a link? I never saw anything about this in the media. If so, I would have expected him to have been dropped like Enzo.

"La garantía soy yo" 😅
(that's one Spanish saying I know)

8 hours ago, GarnachoCheese said:

I’m talking about Chelsea bud. I don’t support Utd so don’t care what happens there, each to their own though

Well, the mole at Man United disappeared when Garnacho moved to Chelsea. Then Chelsea had a mole. It could of course just be a coincidence.
I wonder if there will be a mole at River Plate next season?

13 hours ago, forbzy said:

Do you have a link? I never saw anything about this in the media. If so, I would have expected him to have been dropped like Enzo.

Confirmed by the same source confirming Garnacho was the mole