ws6blue Posted October 29, 2010 Posted October 29, 2010 ok, lets start wiv; 1. best fitness record in PL history 2. most consecutive appearances for an outfield player in PL 3. hardly ever injured then, add in; 1. new relationship in his life 2. she has a new job, which requires her to be up at 4.00am weekdays and er.........................lamps injured with same groin injury drogs took 2 weeks to recover from so what the real story here chels?
cfckeane Posted October 29, 2010 Posted October 29, 2010 You're doubting one of our most consistent and committed players? I don't agree with your theory I'm afraid.
Backbiter Posted October 29, 2010 Posted October 29, 2010 lamps injured with same groin injury drogs took 2 weeks to recover from so what the real story here chels? They aren't the same injury. Lamps' is taking longer to recover from. Nothing more to add.
bcarroll Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 this layoff will stand lamps in good stead come the business end of the season.....
Liam Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 ok, lets start wiv; 1. best fitness record in PL history 2. most consecutive appearances for an outfield player in PL 3. hardly ever injured then, add in; 1. new relationship in his life 2. she has a new job, which requires her to be up at 4.00am weekdays and er.........................lamps injured with same groin injury drogs took 2 weeks to recover from so what the real story here chels? You're going to have to spell it out for me. What is your theory?
The Moos Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 They aren't the same injury. Lamps' is taking longer to recover from. Nothing more to add. I think it's the same injury. Atleast, that's what I've heard/read. He had the same surgery as Drogba.
Mikstaw Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 (edited) I think it's the same injury. Atleast, that's what I've heard/read. He had the same surgery as Drogba. Yes, it's the same surgery, but Lampard has got some complications he hasn't played for so long time... Edited October 30, 2010 by Mikstaw
dkw Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Dear god, are you seriously questioning Lampards commitment oar am I reading it wrong.
Hutch Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Sounds to me like one of those "it made perfect sense when I was down the boozer" type theories.
RegRabid Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Thought he had a groin injury on to contend with as well??
moi Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Has Peter Kenyon been tampering with Lamp's groin, perchance?
RegRabid Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 (edited) Has Peter Kenyon been tampering with Lamp's groin, perchance? Peter Kenyon looks the type to particularly enjoy tampering with his own groin! Edited October 30, 2010 by RegRabid
Gem Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Has Peter Kenyon been tampering with Lamp's groin, perchance? If not, I'll offer!
PloKoon13 Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 If I was going out with Christine Bleakley, my groin would be too sore for football too.
moi Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 If I was going out with Christine Bleakley, my groin would be too sore for football too. I think it would be the staying in that would cause the trouble!
dkw Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 (edited) I think it would be the staying in that would cause the trouble! To be fair it would be the in and the out causing the trouble. And the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out. Edited October 30, 2010 by dkw
Spiller86 Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 To be fair it would be the in and the out causing the trouble. And the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out and the in and the out. All sounds a bit one dimensional dkw, surely a bit of finesse is required?
dkw Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 All sounds a bit one dimensional dkw, surely a bit of finesse is required? Finesse? What are you, one of these modern men where the womens needs are put first. pffff.
Spiller86 Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Finesse? What are you, one of these modern men where the womens needs are put first. pffff. Ah Touche.
dkw Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Ah Touche. Hey, none of that foreign stuff either.
Maksimov Posted October 30, 2010 Posted October 30, 2010 Hey, none of that foreign stuff either. You're French and you know you are.
ws6blue Posted October 31, 2010 Author Posted October 31, 2010 simple explanation is he has injury taking while to heal...................but for me just doesn't stack up - not suggesting much other than maybe he has focus elsewhere he didn't have before, lets see if he comes back next week or so q. is who would be dropped for him?
Recommended Posts