From Blue Moon written by that T*tt*nh*m c**t again:

The two faces of Terry...............

This is from the top table they are very very annoyed with Terry decision to stay at Chelski, they were very confident that he would join, he has always given the impression he would join City and said so in many discussions. He even threatened to hand in a transfer request if he had to. This is why City didn't pull the plug on the deal because they always believed it would happen,

Yeah? So says a T*tt*nh*m c**t. Who the f**k does he think he is? You know what? f**k that c**t, and f**k every single City fan who's stupid enough to swallow that garbage., and believe me those f**king Mancs are lapping it up.

f**k 'em all.

He's just a poor little Yi**o

Wasn't he supposed to have insider information and had never been wrong about these things? :)

thanks for the info sm and good to have you back. Whilst it is not good that JT turned us down (although Chelsea never officially accepted a bid) it is good to see City keep a dignified silence. Whilst i don't like us being made to look like idiots who can't attract the top tier of players I think whinging about it would make us look petty.

Love the City and dignified silence, I seem to recall their manager making a pathetic sales pitch and then complaining about us making the bid public.

From Blue Moon written by that T*tt*nh*m c**t again:

Yeah? So says a T*tt*nh*m c**t. Who the f**k does he think he is? You know what? f**k that c**t, and f**k every single City fan who's stupid enough to swallow that garbage., and believe me those f**king Mancs are lapping it up.

f**k 'em all.

so your don't think there is any element of truth in City's bid for either Lesscott or Terry, or the player's considered a massive pay rise??

You should have asked him about Robbie Keane or Defoe being welcomed home with open arm's!

Edited July 31, 200916 yr by BLUENUT

so your don't think there is any element of truth in City's bid for either Lesscott or Terry, or the player's considered a massive pay rise??

You should have asked him about Robbie Keane or Defoe being welcomed home with open arm's!

I wouldn't waste my time. I'd never heard of the Blue Moon forum til City fans started coming here in droves, then I checked out their JT transfer thread, and since then it's amused me to note how many Chelsea players they've attempted to forge links with. Apart from JT, "should we buy's" I've seen include Carvalho, Essien, Ashley Cole, Deco, Petr Cech and God knows who else. And what I've discovered is that the level of delusion among City fans seriously rivals that of Scousers. According to them, JT either didn't sign for them either because Roman wouldn't let him or because he didn't have the bottle. He was "lucky to have been asked". Or they didn't want him anyway. Not good enough for them. And you know something, much as I detest the way the media kowtows to Alex Ferguson, if the mentality of the majority of City fans at Blue Moon is anything to go by, then he was bang on the money when he called City a small club.

Honestly, I don't remember fans of any club behaving so bitterly towards a player who didn't sign for them. As far as they in common with so much of the British media are concerned, JT is the villain, Roman is a megavillain, and Chelsea are still the enemy of football.

And all this is compounded by the way these City fans so eagerly lap up the scraps of anti-Chelsea, JT what a two-faced git propaganda fed to them by this T*tt*nh*m c**t.

Forget about the fact that IF this T*tt*nh*m c**t is correct, that JT did have "many a discussion" without never once being given permission to talk to City. City are annoyed? Who gives a f**k. And where does he get that JT has "always given the impression he would join". This "impression" was one that was propogated by the media and by City fans, even by Mark Hughes, for whom I have lost a massive amount of respect, on a par with the amount of respect I lost for him after the game in which his Blackburn side kicked us off the park - on his express instructions, and the way he defended his team and his "tactics" after the game.

So City always believed it would happen - well more fool them. Similarly with City fans who are more willing to take the word of an anonymous T*tt*nh*m c**t than anything coming from Chelsea FC that doesn't fit their own particular view of the word,

From Blue Moon written by that T*tt*nh*m c**t again:

Yeah? So says a T*tt*nh*m c**t. Who the f**k does he think he is? You know what? f**k that c**t, and f**k every single City fan who's stupid enough to swallow that garbage., and believe me those f**king Mancs are lapping it up.

f**k 'em all.

I say GAS THEM ALL

I say GAS THEM ALL

You're not going to last long here at this rate.

Yep pretty much what Lofty said.

Gas chamber references are not welcome here. All that crap has no place on this forum.

I didnt mean to cause any Offence to anyone

Sorry Guys

Edited July 31, 200916 yr by Cumbernauld Diamond 1977

neat apology - but the word is Offence

Edited July 31, 200916 yr by yorkleyblue

I didnt mean to cause any Offence to anyone

Sorry Guys

Err...you didn't mean to cause offence to anyone. Why would you write it then?

Nice lengthy repose from lofty,just about sums up what i would want to say,and eloquently written,that whole forum thread from the blue moon site,is a joke,i actualy think they believe he has treated citeh as one of their own,and Mark hughes has gone from hero to Absolute zero,with his piss poor baiting tactics,i do hope it goes tits up for the arrogant mancs.

Err...you didn't mean to cause offence to anyone. Why would you write it then?

cause obv you can tell i dont like spurs

i have said sorry what else do you want me to do

throw away your bnp membership?

The guy made a stupid remark, he's apologised, comments about the BNP are totally unnecessary. It could be worse, he could be a Mail reading, immigrant hating, fox hunting, Diana death obsessed Tory who gets on his high horse about everything and wouldn't entertain the fact that his opinion is not fact.

Ho hum.

(No offence, obviously)

Edited July 31, 200916 yr by Gem

The guy made a stupid remark, he's apologised, comments about the BNP are totally unnecessary. It could be worse, he could be a Mail reading, immigrant hating, fox hunting, Diana death obsessed Tory who gets on his high horse about everything and wouldn't entertain the fact that his opinion is not fact.

Ho hum.

(No offence, obviously)

Well said Gem, except about the Tory's .. our next government in waiting :P

throw away your bnp membership?

why say that? he said something stupid and apologised. how does what he said mean hes in the BNP?

dkw- I was making a reference / comparison with mark collett.

I wrote that because I find his "apology" totally disingenuous, and the apparent willingness of others to just forget it worrying.

I generally don't find "gas chamber" remarks to be the kind of accident that slips off the tongue, and I do think it's telling that he totally ducked ken's totally completely question (which I'd also like to see answered).

in fact now you've made me think of it (and have been forced to remember the shameful xenophobia directed towards avram grant on this site, some of it from people still posting today), I find it more upsetting and serious a thing to be honest.

gem- personally I don't find it that funny.

Edited July 31, 200916 yr by gullit4

There's a line to be crossed, and Gas them all undoubtedly crosses that line. You can call the c**ts and you can call them scum because they are. You can call them y*ds because that's how they refer to themselves, but any Gas Chamber type remark comes directly from neo-Nazism. Now I don't now, maybe Cumbernauld Diamond truly doesn't realise the connotations of such remarks.

What I do know is that certain people, Chelsea supporters have been known to go along with extreme Nazi type chants when we were playing T*tt*nh*m or on one shamefully memorable occasion when a home match at the Bridge coincided with Hitler's birthday. I can't remember who we were playing that day. What stands out in my memory is the constant chanting of Deutchland Uber Alles, people wearing Hitler masks and holding the straight arm Nazi salute throughout the game. You have a few drinks, you go along with it because anti-Jew, anti-y*d, anti-T*tt*hm*m, what's the difference? Aside fromthe real racists, the genuine far-right activists, that was a fairly common attitude, but one that was all too easy to exploit. That's as far as I'm taking this. I'll leave the rest to your imagination.

But G4, whatever this bloke's motives, I agree - there is no funny side.

I generally don't find "gas chamber" remarks to be the kind of accident that slips off the tongue

whatever this bloke's motives, I agree - there is no funny side.

I fully agree. ;)

dkw- I was making a reference / comparison with mark collett.

I wrote that because I find his "apology" totally disingenuous, and the apparent willingness of others to just forget it worrying.

I generally don't find "gas chamber" remarks to be the kind of accident that slips off the tongue, and I do think it's telling that he totally ducked ken's totally completely question (which I'd also like to see answered).

in fact now you've made me think of it (and have been forced to remember the shameful xenophobia directed towards avram grant on this site, some of it from people still posting today), I find it more upsetting and serious a thing to be honest.

gem- personally I don't find it that funny.

And your comment about the BNP made me chuckle.

What would you suggest happen then?

And your comment about the BNP made me chuckle.

What would you suggest happen then?

exactly what i was getting at. he said something bang out of order, and apologised. G4 then says one that wasnt anywhere near as bad but still unecessary. look, he f**ked up and was stupid, fair enough. hes apologised so cant we give him a chance to redeem himself?

And your comment about the BNP made me chuckle.

What would you suggest happen then?

it's not my forum, and loz and mod (and the mods) run this place better than any "discussion" site I have seen so I really don't want to come across as ungrateful, but personally I don't think it'd be a loss to remove these people permanently. only a couple of months ago we've had "death threats" on this site picked up in the media, so for that reason alone I don't think it's too harsh a suggestion.

I don't think it's a coincidence that you or dkw or any of the dozens of other regular posters who have posted year after year have managed to get by without accidentally making a remark like that.

it's not my forum, and loz and mod (and the mods) run this place better than any "discussion" site I have seen so I really don't want to come across as ungrateful, but personally I don't think it'd be a loss to remove these people permanently. only a couple of months ago we've had "death threats" on this site picked up in the media, so for that reason alone I don't think it's too harsh a suggestion.

I don't think it's a coincidence that you or dkw or any of the dozens of other regular posters who have posted year after year have managed to get by without accidentally making a remark like that.

Fair enough, I respect that view.