Positives:

It was on the whole less embarrassing than the time they did us 3-0 at the Bridge about 15 years ago (Zenden was playing).

Literally every single one of us predicted that this would happen so we can all feel satisfied with ourselves.

Take your pick.

Acheampong. Easy decision. Best of a very bad bunch. Should be one of the first names on yhe tesmsheet for the forseeable.

Acheampong for me, he's better than Chalobah already IMO and has a higher ceiling.

Nearly every other player was below par today.

Josh for me.

And I miss Chalobah's hair.

I can't vote.

Even if Acheampong was the best player, I still think he was at fault for the first goal with his weak headed clearance from a long throw.

I went with Garnacho.

Beggars belief why he was hooked when Neto was worse than abysmal today.

Really starting to look like Maresca has his ‘favourites’ regardless of their performance

Garnacho for me too! Took his goal well and didn't do a lot wrong!

35 minutes ago, The Boehly Babes said:

I went with Garnacho.

Beggars belief why he was hooked when Neto was worse than abysmal today.

Really starting to look like Maresca has his ‘favourites’ regardless of their performance

He was normal, blessed by an excellent Pedro Neto assist (so he can be eternally grateful to him), but other than that, he was average, after the goal, lots of over-hit passes, just running at players.. but not actually doing anything, i.e taking them on. Before he got hooked, he went for the Hollywood shot and hit row z. Like United fans have rightly pointed out, Garnacho is a lottery player, lots of input before any output. Pretty much suits us though, as the entire club is run like a lottery, heck.. we even avoided signing a keeper to put it all on red (Penders) for next season. Unfortunately, aside from literally 2 players (at best) the SD’s are just buying lottery tickets.

Voted Josh, if he was on the pitch all game we wouldn't have lost today.