I dont know how many of you guys play FIFA, but what do you think CFC players will be ranked? 

Hope they are accurate. David Luiz is sh*t in '13. He couldn't shoot for sh*t and didn't evolve under my control anyway.

Mata and Hazard were on a good level in '13 so they should be slightly better.

Oscar is the difficult one for the creators of the game IMO.

Hope they are accurate. David Luiz is sh*t in '13. He couldn't shoot for sh*t and didn't evolve under my control anyway.

Mata and Hazard were on a good level in '13 so they should be slightly better.

Oscar is the difficult one for the creators of the game IMO.

Apart from shooting and overall rating (79) Luiz is actually fantastic defensively.

Really curious to see if they will still overrate all the Barca players and give Luiz, Rami and our co abysmal ratings..

Luiz is one of the most popular players in Ultimate Team in both midfield and defence in FIFA 13, by no means was he sh*t.

 

Mata and Hazard deserve 5* skill moves (currently only have 4) and both deserve to get upgraded a few points too, both were underrated compared to other players in their positions.

 

Dave should also get upgraded, he's only 77 on FIFA13, I expect Luiz will get upgraded again and Oscar should also get a bit of an upgrade.

 

Torres will probably get downgraded and so will Ba, Lukaku should get a considerable boost.

More looking forward to see what they're going to do in Football Manager 2014.

I got excited then, thought you had them, my disappointment was immense.

...then I realised that's a little sad.

We're going to have a starting XI filled with players rated around the 80 mark with the exception of Hazard and Mata who will be around 85.

 

Our current strikers will probably make playing online tricky. 

 

 

Barca and Bayern will probably again be filled with players around 86. 

I just hope they put Oscar's stamina and tackling up. I really don't play so much online nowadays, so I edit our players to what I think they should be.

Hazard hopefully looks like hazard to start with.

Expect this pretty much Mata 87, Hazard 86, Luiz 82, Torres 81 and Azpi 80.

I found this don't know how accurate though

http://playupsports.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/chelsea-expected-fifa-14-player-ratings/

Thought it was laughable how Silva was an 88 tbh. Mata should be higher than him after the season they've both just had.

Either way i wont be buying it, football games annoy me

Edited July 12, 201313 yr by CFCflynn

I found this don't know how accurate though

http://playupsports.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/chelsea-expected-fifa-14-player-ratings/

 

That's being extremely generous, especially given EA's tendency of late to turn a blind eye to many of our players.

Bloody hell I'd be dead chuffed with those!

In the ratings thing for Luiz it says "Not the most technical of defenders..." He is often too technical at times. 

I found this don't know how accurate though

http://playupsports.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/chelsea-expected-fifa-14-player-ratings/

 

I would be extremely surprised if those are accurate.

In the ratings thing for Luiz it says "Not the most technical of defenders..." He is often too technical at times. 

 

Yeah, I don't know who wrote that part.

I would be extremely surprised if those are accurate.

Especially the 89 for Mata & Hazard. They would get 89 if they left for Barca/Real, but here, no chance of more than 86/87

Especially the 89 for Mata & Hazard. They would get 89 if they left for Barca/Real, but here, no chance of more than 86/87

 

Yep, the chances of our whole team (except JT) getting boosts seems very unlikely.

 

I'm sure Pique will once again be rated 89 or something ridiculous though.

Vidic is usually too high IMO as well. Wasn't he an 88 last season?

So Bale is the cover star of Fifa '14.

I have drifted away from Fifa and every console game. I really need to replace my PS3 asap.

New FUT trailer is up for FIFA 14.

 

Chelsea player ratings in the video I spotted were.

 

A. Cole - 84

Hazard - 85

Mata - 86

 

 

Both Mata and Hazard are underrated if it stays like that in my opinion.

Nah Hazard at 85 is fine i think but Mata should be higher though.

Edited July 29, 201312 yr by jack_super_class

Just seen the ratings people who are better/on par with Hazard on the ratings is what I think is stupid.

 

Di Maria is 86

David Silva is 88 imho Mata is better

Di Natale is 87 and I think he's a good player but not better than Hazard or Mata

Hernanes is rated 85 no where near Hazards level imo 

Hamsik is 85 very good player but again don't think he's as good as Hazard

Carzola is 85 and Hazard is far better 

Navas is 85 

 

I just feel they are either over rating players or criminally under rating Mata and Hazard if it stays the same