I wonder how this affects City, Newcastle, and United's potential ownership. 

 

Breaking: Premier League clubs agree new rules that can see owners/directors disqualified for “human rights abuses, based on Global Human Rights Sanctions Regulations 2020”

— Rob Harris (@RobHarris) March 30, 2023

if c**t Fabinho would play for us he would be booked every f**king game. but playing for Liverpool just gives him card blanche for every dirty trick he has in the pocket

after 6 minutes 3 dirty fouls from Fabinho and still not booked

Officials are so bias in the country, 3 fouls from Fabinho and just a warning.

You just know a Chelsea player will get booked on his 2nd foul later on today.

I thought the ref got it right. None of the fouls were yellow card offences; taking Fabinho aside and saying 'steady on mate' was probably the right approach.

The commentators are chatting some utter sh*t - bleating on about the 'respect' between the two teams then saying Mahrez "couldn't have struck it any better" as he hit a shot off target...

6 minutes ago, PloKoon13 said:

I thought the ref got it right. None of the fouls were yellow card offences; taking Fabinho aside and saying 'steady on mate' was probably the right approach.

While you make a good point about the actual fouls, there’s no doubt in my mind that officials are soft on Liverpool.

It used to be Lucas Leica that was allowed 6 or 7 fouls per match for Liverpool, now it’s Fabinho.

They are treated very differently to most teams IMO.

f**k me that was a great City goal. 
 

We would’ve paused and passed it backwards somehow. 

what a collective team goal from City

7 minutes ago, 2211 said:

While you make a good point about the actual fouls, there’s no doubt in my mind that officials are soft on Liverpool.

It used to be Lucas Leica that was allowed 6 or 7 fouls per match for Liverpool, now it’s Fabinho.

They are treated very differently to most teams IMO.

Must be all that respect

19 minutes ago, PloKoon13 said:

I thought the ref got it right. None of the fouls were yellow card offences; taking Fabinho aside and saying 'steady on mate' was probably the right approach.

the last one could be easy a booking. the point is when you make 3 consecutive fouls in 5 minutes non of them need to be a yellow to be booked finally

And don’t get me started on Fabinho’s foul on the Brighton player that should of been a red card.

Edited April 1, 20233 yr by 2211

watch Arnold kicks Grealsih in the head

Classic LiVARpool half that 

Another brilliant goal. 

love to see LiVARpool getting taken apart

plenty to enjoy in this one 4-1

Grealish deserved his goal he has been excellent today 

Jack Grealish (particularly given he may well be MOTM) as a wing-back may be an even more hilarious innovation than Victor Moses at wing-back.

So sh*t from Liverpool. Torn apart. 

City have looked so good today. I can't work out if that's because they simply have been fantastic or whether Liverpool have just been very poor. The gulf between these sides looks huge.

5 minutes ago, carrickblue said:

City have looked so good today. I can't work out if that's because they simply have been fantastic or whether Liverpool have just been very poor. The gulf between these sides looks huge.

When do we play City? I wonder if we can just phone in sick?

City have been on fire today.

They’d have made Liverpool look like a proper mid table team.

1 minute ago, Snedger said:

When do we play City? I wonder if we can just phone in sick?

I think we'd need to ..... 

8 minutes ago, carrickblue said:

City have looked so good today. I can't work out if that's because they simply have been fantastic or whether Liverpool have just been very poor. The gulf between these sides looks huge.

They have slow 40 year olds in midfield tbf. 
 

Over run.