June 1, 20179 yr 4 minutes ago, buzzcfc said: We shouldn't bother with offers, just match the buyout clause and go all out for this one. We need somebody close to Hazards level up there with him and I really think this lad is it Not to forget the £1.00 on top of the buyout clause to sweeten the deal
June 1, 20179 yr no point trying to activate his buy out clause. Atlético will no doubt dig their heels now, since they can't get a replacement. They could force us to have to pay 40% tax on top of the £85m. I also can't see greizmann pushing too hard and leaving them short, he seems to have a good relationship with someone and the fans. I think this one is shelved until next summer.
June 1, 20179 yr Griezmann to Chelsea, Hazard to Real Madrid, Diego to Atlético next summer? Maybe Real Madrid will offer us Morata to sweeten a deal for Hazard this summer? Edited June 1, 20179 yr by the special one
June 1, 20179 yr Costa and 30 m for griezmann in January would make perfect sense for both clubs but it's a matter or whether his hearts set on Manchester
June 1, 20179 yr Not sure if this has been said already. But the telegraph are saying that utd are now definitely out of the running and won't be trying to sign griezmann. Instead they are going to only go for a target man. Fingers crossed!
June 1, 20179 yr Griezmann all but confirmed he wont be going anywere this year. Probably prinised Atletico he wouldnt move if the transfer embargo was uphekd. Which also means Costa in all likelyhoo stays
June 1, 20179 yr Atletico got banned for one year from buying players. There is no chance they will lose Griezmann.
June 1, 20179 yr also means lukaku is free to go to utd, unless of course utd stick with ibrahimovic as their main man again.
June 1, 20179 yr 23 minutes ago, enigma said: also means lukaku is free to go to utd, unless of course utd stick with ibrahimovic as their main man again. I don't mind United spending 100m+ on Lukaku instead of us.
June 1, 20179 yr 9 minutes ago, comtrend said: I don't mind United spending 100m+ on Lukaku instead of us. Fingers crossed they do.
June 1, 20179 yr But uniteds problem is scoring against the cannon fodder teams. If there's one thing that Lukaku is good at, it's scoring in the "non important" games.
June 1, 20179 yr 2 hours ago, comtrend said: I don't mind United spending 100m+ on Lukaku instead of us. They could also go for Lacazette who was heading for Atletico.
Create an account or sign in to comment