Jump to content

Welcome to Chelsea Ben Chilwell

Jezz

By Jezz
in General Chelsea FC

 Share
Chelsea Megastore
Chelsea Megastore

Chelsea Megastore

Recommended Posts



jack_super_class

jack_super_class

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, forbzy said:

Ideally Chilwell wouldn't have been starting tonight after his injury layoffs. He needed to be gradually eased back into the team, and certainly not starting his first game in a while at in-form Liverpool. I think Colwill would have started if fit.

You are talking like he wasn't bad last season too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


forbzy

forbzy

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, jack_super_class said:

You are talking like he wasn't bad last season too.

My biggest issue with Chilwell has been that he seems to be continually injured just as he seems to be returning to something like his old self. So he spends a handful of games getting up to speed and then seems to get injured again. Pretty well been the same thing with Reece, although thankfully Gusto has provided some decent cover at RB this season. With Cucurella injured and not convincing at LB in most of his appearances, I would like to see us find decent cover there too. Even if Chilwell does have more luck with injuries we still need better cover at LB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


forbzy

forbzy

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Chilwell in a nutshell. 

 

I'd say both Chilwell and Reece have generally looked better as wing backs. Given our defensive issues I still thank that would be a better option. Our wingers are mostly useless anyway so use the wing backs and then play a 5-3-2 with 2 of Nkunku/Jackson/Palmer up top.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sconnie Blue

Sconnie Blue

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, forbzy said:

I'd say both Chilwell and Reece have generally looked better as wing backs. Given our defensive issues I still thank that would be a better option. Our wingers are mostly useless anyway so use the wing backs and then play a 5-3-2 with 2 of Nkunku/Jackson/Palmer up top.

This would in turn make the likes of Mudryk and Madueke completely redundant but i've completely lost all hope on the former and I think the latter is a Palace level player at best. 

Need to take a look at that Sporting manager. 

Edited by Sconnie Blue
Link to comment
Share on other sites


forbzy

forbzy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

This would in turn make the likes of Mudryk and Madueke completely redundant but i've completely lost all hope on the former and I think the latter is a Palace level player at best. 

Need to take a look at that Sporting manager. 

Exactly. I could see the case for sticking with 4 at the back while we were trying to integrate the likes of Mudryk. But on the evidence to date I see no advantage in persisting with this approach. For example, if we are to have any chance against Liverpool in the Carabao Cup final I would think we have to tighten up at the back and approach the game more defensively. The time to try that approach is now, with Villa away perhaps presenting a good opportunity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ballack & Blu

Ballack & Blu

Posted
Posted

I hope what I read about Chilly isn’t factual, apparently after wolves game was quoted as saying,’ Reason we lost was Wolves wanted it more’, that’s either surgically clean honesty or something the VC shouldn’t utter even if true, that smacks of no trust of Poch??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
axman2526

axman2526

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, Ballack & Blu said:

I hope what I read about Chilly isn’t factual, apparently after wolves game was quoted as saying,’ Reason we lost was Wolves wanted it more’, that’s either surgically clean honesty or something the VC shouldn’t utter even if true, that smacks of no trust of Poch??

Did it look like we wanted it as much as Wolves?

Call out those players stealing a living. God on Chilli

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Sconnie Blue

Sconnie Blue

Posted
Posted
31 minutes ago, Ballack & Blu said:

I hope what I read about Chilly isn’t factual, apparently after wolves game was quoted as saying,’ Reason we lost was Wolves wanted it more’, that’s either surgically clean honesty or something the VC shouldn’t utter even if true, that smacks of no trust of Poch??

Poch denying Chilwell said that. Even though he did. 

There is a clear issue in the dressing room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Ballack & Blu

Ballack & Blu

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Poch denying Chilwell said that. Even though he did. 

There is a clear issue in the dressing room. 

100% there is, Caceidos reaction to being subbed, verged on Violence to the dug out, just seems like the rest of em, frustrated at Poch’s tactics

Link to comment
Share on other sites


axman2526

axman2526

Posted
Posted
47 minutes ago, dansubrosa said:

How much longer are we giving him before we start criticising him?

I thought he offered absolutely nothing in attack, really abysmal. Compare him to Gusto… Really disappointing.

Maybe 10 seconds? That how long it took you to type your second paragraph after your first one Dan? ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ajbod

Ajbod

Posted
Posted

The problem last night was with silva behind him, he was very reluctant to push up. Had he done so, we know only too well what Palaces tactic would be, lump it into the space, with Silva not wanting to go out wide enough. with Badiashile or Colwill behind, he's far more adventurous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up

Well, this is awkward!

Happy Sunny Days GIF by Atlassian

The Shed End Forum relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to show these to make sure we can stay online and continue to keep the forum running. Over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this domain by switching it off and whitelisting the website? Some of the advert banners can actually be closed to avoid interference with your experience on The Shed End.

If you don't want to view any adverts while logged in and using your account, consider using the Ad-Free Subscription which is renewable every year. To buy a subscription, log in to your account and click the link under the Newbies forum on the home page.

Cheers now!

Sure, let me in!