I see they're redone it again. Looks a bit nicer, sleeker.

 

http://www.chelseafc.com

I prefer the older one much easier to navigate

Nice that it is responsive, not sure it is much better for the user on desktop though

Hope they rebooted the virtual waiting room as well

Looks great and easy to navigate, for me at least.

Looks great and easy to navigate, for me at least.

I guess I just don't like change ha ha

Looks nice and clean and I like how the sites are no longer separated from mobile and 'full' site. Outdated concept in today's design

It's ok. Usually I prefer simple, lightweight websites and don't like it when things like menus appear/disappear just by moving the mouse around but this isn't so bad. It looks like it's designed to be a good middle-ground for people using mice and touch screens, which makes sense.

 

I just found a dead link trying to get to the "True Blue" membership section from the Tickets page, I have reported it so that's my good dead done for the day.

I prefer the older one much easier to navigate

I find this set up much more easier to navigate, & it looks the business.

We cannot all be the same, otherwise we would have no decent arguments.

The font is total garbage

I worked for a digital agency who we were in talks to re-do our website a couple of years ago (the ticket portal was one of the main parts of the discussions) - apparently the clubs digital team were quite junior and really silo-ed as an organisation. Talks would just hit a wall, and they found it hard to make a case to get the kind of budget needed to get the job done properly! Funny that.. 

Edited July 10, 201412 yr by Jones1905

that annoying little bubble (?) in bottom corner could be removed........but onwards and upwards...the blues corporation doesn't stand still on anything

The typeface isnt the best choice, a nice font like OpenSans would have been nice maybe.

Jones, I am sure your agency would have cost the club an absolute fortune, its no surprise they kept it in house for the designers and developers, as they are investable as well.

Personally I think the structure and design of the new site is pretty decent, built on a nice responsive grid.... its just the fonts I don't particularly like.

That annoying little bubble (?) in bottom corner could be removed........but onwards and upwards...the blues corporation doesn't stand still on anything

Pretty sure that bubble is just there on a very temporary basis to report bugs and dead links.

the online CFC TV is well 2 bob now, video plays like its in slow motion

 

any ideas on how to fix it, is it my media player on the lap top ??

Looks sh*t. Prefer the old one.

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2014/7/11/5889593/romelu-lukaku-kurt-zouma-the-chelsea-website-is-very-confused

 

This kind of sh*t is embarrassing. Not the first time the website has been a complete f**k up.

That is pretty bad, but not the end of the world.

There's probably 2 or 3 designers in there under intense pressure, its as much the designers fault as the person who should be proof reading and signing off.

http://weaintgotnohistory.sbnation.com/2014/7/11/5889593/romelu-lukaku-kurt-zouma-the-chelsea-website-is-very-confused

 

This kind of sh*t is embarrassing. Not the first time the website has been a complete f**k up.

 

Blimey that's some overreaction in that article. 

 

An entire website has just relaunched, there's always going to be a list of snagging issues to resolve.

 

Yes it's a cock up but it's not the end of the world, heaven forbid they should make any mistakes on their own site. 

Why is it pretty bad? Because they're black? Would it be "pretty bad" if they accidentally put Fabregas's picture on Matic's profile? Or would it be a complete non-story?

Edited July 11, 201412 yr by Zeta Orionis

No it would be exactly the same, race doesn't come into it! It's just a basic error that could have been avoided. Hardly a big deal though.

I've had a look this morning and Zouma's profile isn't on there now.

 

I'm assuming it's because they don't have an official club photo of him in his Chelsea kit like the rest of the players. 

 

When whoever was setting up the site they may have substituted his photo for one of Lukaku to test it but forgot to remove it before making the website go live. 

 

I'm sure it was an honest mistake and I'm just surprised by the tone of the WAGNH article on it. 

Anyone else having issues with loading the Chelsea website since the new look came in?

 

I've had it a few times now where the site just loads up as a blank white page or after loading the formatting isn't right.

 

I assume it's just teething problems but it's a bit frustrating when you're trying to read up on big announcements like Costa's signing or the Luis transfer being agreed, 

Only thing that annoys me about the site is that they didnt invest some dosh in the ticket system. The virtual waiting room is bound to be crap this year as well

What is the bloody point of making the full games available to view in the on-demand section only to have that f**king banner at the bottom of the page telling you the score of the last game ????