13 hours ago, TheCeleryKing said:

Why did we reject a proper manager like Luis Enrique? He would have been a good manager for us.

Was my personal choice at the time but I believe he refused to be a yes man like Enzo.

On 04/03/2025 at 23:26, 2211 said:

Arsenal even had less possession and passing and shooting stats was similar between the 2 teams by all accounts.

Saying that PSV kept making mistakes and lost possession in daft areas though.

I watched the first part then as soon as Myles Lewis-Skelly escaped a second yellow, then Arsenal went straight up the other end and scored I knew everything was gonna go Arsenal's way so I turned over.

They can rest most of their players in the 2nd leg before the match against us now - The Dutch league is a joke, embarrassing result to lose at home.

That result has annoyed me and is bad news for us.

How can you be 6 goals down after playing the 1st leg at home!

Oh god, don't rub it in! I support PSV in the Eredivisie 🫣

5 hours ago, Remodez said:

Was my personal choice at the time but I believe he refused to be a yes man like Enzo.

Reports we rejected him but it’s evident neither he nor Nagelsmann wanted to work with the 2 dickheads and be held to a different standard than them.

6 hours ago, abigsmurf said:

They kept saying that this was a brand new PSG side and they're playing completely unlike they were before with them coming together as a cohesive team but it ended up being exactly the same as so many previous years. Lots of huffing and puffing with great chances , but they couldn't score and end up conceding.

To be fair, they were excellent last night. Allison had a once in a career performance and Kvaratskhelia's goal was like a cm offside.

2 hours ago, Scott Harris said:

To be fair, they were excellent last night. Allison had a once in a career performance and Kvaratskhelia's goal was like a cm offside.

I’ve honestly lost count of how many times Liverpool have had those kind of goals ruled offsides after VAR intervened.

How bad must Fenerbahce be to lose at home to Rangers

This has been dull, but expected. Both City/Forest focusing more on shutting up shop. Even saw Haaland defending outside his box.

A draw is the best result as we can go into 3rd if we win. If there is to be a winner, I would go for City as I reckon Forest will drop so we can possibly take their place. Newcastle away to West Ham as well which could be favourable.

Night and day difference between us and Forest regarding their structural discipline when defending. Easy to see why we concede every game.

6 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Night and day difference between us and Forest regarding their structural discipline when defending. Easy to see why we concede every game.

They defend deep though.

On another note; City wingers also seem to struggle with the double team, especially with no fullbacks making off the ball runs.

4 minutes ago, ducavis said:

They defend deep though.

They don’t defend any deeper than any other well structured side.

f**king hell CHO

Forest 1-0 City

Hudson Odoi!!!

That Hudson-Odoi looks a real player at Forest. Lets make a cheeky bid and see if we can get that sort of talent on our books.

Just now, Sconnie Blue said:

They don’t defend any deeper than any other well structured side.

f**king hell CHO

Can’t believe we sold him for £3m. It was obvious he was talented, hence the Bayern interest at 18.

Just now, ross91690 said:

That Hudson-Odoi looks a real player at Forest. Lets make a cheeky bid and see if we can get that sort of talent on our books.

Yeah can’t wait to see him hug the touchline finding himself in 1v2 situations 98% of the time.

Just now, ducavis said:

Can’t believe we sold him for £3m. It was obvious he was talented, hence the Bayern interest at 18.

Hefty sell on clause I think.

Just now, Sconnie Blue said:

Yeah can’t wait to see him hug the touchline finding himself in 1v2 situations 98% of the time.

I hate our manager, too.

Aina doesn't get talked about enough, either. Hell of a player.

2 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Hefty sell on clause I think.

Nope. Just £2m in add ons. Crazy thing is Forest already placed a £40m price tag on him last summer, a £35m profit after one season.

Oi oi oi Hudson odoi

2 minutes ago, ross91690 said:

Aina doesn't get talked about enough, either. Hell of a player.

I know you’re talking about former Chelsea players but if I could have anyone from Forest it’d be Murillo. He is IMMENSE

2 minutes ago, ross91690 said:

Aina doesn't get talked about enough, either. Hell of a player.

It’s been evident the majority of Cobham graduates are better than the majority of players we sign over the years

1 minute ago, ducavis said:

Nope. Just £2m in add ons. Crazy thing is Forest already placed a £40m price tag on him last summer, a £35m profit after one season.

The Athletic reported we do.

Hudson-Odoi will cost Forest in the region of £3million, with a potential further £2m in add-ons, which looks a bargain for a player who was on the radar of some big clubs only a few years ago. Chelsea will retain a sell-on clause as part of the deal.

Hudson-Odoi, who has four England caps, has been the subject of more than one bid from Bayern Munich in the past, including one potential deal that could have been worth £70million in 2020.

https://www.nytimes.com/athletic/live-blogs/transfer-news-deadline-day-latest-updates/Xx2FTZkPU2Lo/cGFfn6QzfvM2/

Literally everyone can beat City except us.