Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Shed End - Chelsea FC Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Our New Stadium

Featured Replies

51 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

Had we been in a position to build at Earls court, with those above conditions, I believe the CPO would have agreed to it.

8 minutes ago, Term_X said:

Are we not still in a position with Earls Court? Only a month ago there were reports that’s still up in the air.

Wasn't there an inhouse vote and it didn't reach the 76% threshold or w/e it is? You have to respect the CPOs attachment to the Bridge.

It still does look like Earls Court is a possibility but if it didn't reach the vote then it surely won't now considering the clown show Clearlake are currently running. I wouldn't blame them either.

23 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Wasn't there an inhouse vote and it didn't reach the 76% threshold or w/e it is? You have to respect the CPOs attachment to the Bridge.

It still does look like Earls Court is a possibility but if it didn't reach the vote then it surely won't now considering the clown show Clearlake are currently running. I wouldn't blame them either.

Ffs must have missed that. I suppose that’s the ‘new’ issue now, before it was hard.. now it’s near impossible with the level of goodwill towards the owners.

1 hour ago, Term_X said:

Are we not still in a position with Earls Court? Only a month ago there were reports that’s still up in the air.

I believe that one should be beginning its redevelopment project soon.

1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Wasn't there an inhouse vote and it didn't reach the 76% threshold or w/e it is? You have to respect the CPOs attachment to the Bridge.

It still does look like Earls Court is a possibility but if it didn't reach the vote then it surely won't now considering the clown show Clearlake are currently running. I wouldn't blame them either.

Wasn't that to do with Roman buying out the CPO? again @Boyne will know better.

  • 2 weeks later...
7 hours ago, evissy said:

https://x.com/JacobsBen/status/1904124887301546314?t=hQC37ASmFwltvD5fWXXCUw&s=19

It looks like they want a new stadium. Makes sense because it will be cheaper and better for the use it is intended.

It reads like they’re contemplating building it outside London (it’s too complicated in London). Cobham or upgrading Kings Meadow? Too far away for me, so they better get the Southern fans on side to fill the stadium. And make it more accessible than the Emirates or Spuds, which it is not, to attract the tourists to fill it, because those sites are not central nor west London.

38 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

They’ve destroyed their reputation and trust so I’d imagine the CPOs reject every offer until then. And rightly so.

No big deal, they just have to change the clubs name. As luck would have it they have trademarked both "Chels" and "the Chels"

So The Chels Cobham Cowboys is possible

4 hours ago, RMH said:

It reads like they’re contemplating building it outside London (it’s too complicated in London). Cobham or upgrading Kings Meadow? Too far away for me, so they better get the Southern fans on side to fill the stadium. And make it more accessible than the Emirates or Spuds, which it is not, to attract the tourists to fill it, because those sites are not central nor west London.

Spot on. Would rather Old Oak Common than to go as far out as Kingsmeadow, Cobham or even Twickenham.

11 hours ago, RMH said:

It reads like they’re contemplating building it outside London (it’s too complicated in London). Cobham or upgrading Kings Meadow? Too far away for me, so they better get the Southern fans on side to fill the stadium. And make it more accessible than the Emirates or Spuds, which it is not, to attract the tourists to fill it, because those sites are not central nor west London.

Boehly implies as much himself. The division between them is that one will want to redevelop the SB site and the other will want to move and, as we have all worked out, that will likely be out of London. These fking despicable owners won't care about destroying our club if it means they ultimately make more money out of it.

Cobham is stockbroker belt so that just isn't going to work, Kings meadow is too small and Twickenham is staunch rugby and too suburban.

Unless they come up with a completely new location I can't see any further than a redevelopment of SB or Earls Court.

I'll correct that. The board could always have a long running dispute amongst themselves and we stay as we are for the next ten years and watch matchday tickets go up to £200 each.

No way are an American investment corporation going to spend billions ( by borrowing from banks) on a new stadium and then use that increase in revenue for our transfer budget. Not going to happen. Ask Tottenham fans.

On 25/03/2025 at 08:17, Andy North said:

Cobham is stockbroker belt so that just isn't going to work, Kings meadow is too small and Twickenham is staunch rugby and too suburban.

Unless they come up with a completely new location I can't see any further than a redevelopment of SB or Earls Court.

I'll correct that. The board could always have a long running dispute amongst themselves and we stay as we are for the next ten years and watch matchday tickets go up to £200 each.

A bigger stadium will see ticket prices rise anyway. It happened at Spurs, Arsenal etc etc

Boehley's interview with Bloomberg comments on new stadium......

"We have 16-20 years to sort out Chelsea. It’s really complex. It’s not as if we are building something in the middle of a rural environment.

‘So we have a lot of constituencies to make sure we care about. Certainly the Chelsea fan base is one. But long-term, I think we’re going to be building something new, and we’ll figure it out.

‘Stadium development is going on around the world. Stadium development is definitely a theme. You’re going to see the NBA going to Europe, you’re going to see stadiums and arenas, sporting infrastructure.

8 minutes ago, The Rising Sun said:

Boehley's interview with Bloomberg comments on new stadium......

"We have 16-20 years to sort out Chelsea. It’s really complex. It’s not as if we are building something in the middle of a rural environment.

‘So we have a lot of constituencies to make sure we care about. Certainly the Chelsea fan base is one. But long-term, I think we’re going to be building something new, and we’ll figure it out.

‘Stadium development is going on around the world. Stadium development is definitely a theme. You’re going to see the NBA going to Europe, you’re going to see stadiums and arenas, sporting infrastructure.

They’re going to build a soulless Olympic Stadium look alike in Hove, aren’t they?

  • 5 weeks later...

e06df320-20ef-11f0-8451-0101bb35273b.jpg

Villa now announced a refurb, 42k to 50k, set to be complete mid-2027. Not exactly blown away by the architect vision or anything, but nonetheless.

At this rate, we will be the only ones left not doing anything. Pretty bleak.

2 hours ago, C3blue said:

Move the club out of London are they f**king joking.

No, they will seriously consider it.

2 hours ago, C3blue said:

Are they trying to piss off the fans or what?

CFC LDN does not have "fans", just "customers"

2 hours ago, C3blue said:

That’s gonna go down like an horse sh*t sandwich.

Let's see if that motivates our "customers" to do more than a pi$$ poor turn out for a protest none could agree on, or calling Maresca a "w@nker"

4 hours ago, Term_X said:

e06df320-20ef-11f0-8451-0101bb35273b.jpg

Villa now announced a refurb, 42k to 50k, set to be complete mid-2027. Not exactly blown away by the architect vision or anything, but nonetheless.

At this rate, we will be the only ones left not doing anything. Pretty bleak.

We’ll be bottom half in 2-3 years time.

Our problem is that we are stuck between a rock and a hard place. We’re based in an area without enough spare room to fit a chess board, let alone a football pitch and the distance to find enough land would mean we’re a long way from home.

So we’re left with overly expensive bodge job development of our hemmed in one access point stadium. And it’s probably very hard to make a business case for that.

So we just need to accept it and forget about it. Besides, if we don’t even need a shirt sponsor, I guess we don’t need a few extra seats?

1 hour ago, Snedger said:

Our problem is that we are stuck between a rock and a hard place. We’re based in an area without enough spare room to fit a chess board, let alone a football pitch and the distance to find enough land would mean we’re a long way from home.

So we’re left with overly expensive bodge job development of our hemmed in one access point stadium. And it’s probably very hard to make a business case for that.

So we just need to accept it and forget about it. Besides, if we don’t even need a shirt sponsor, I guess we don’t need a few extra seats?

I could be wrong but I thought it was a precondition of the sale that there had to be new stadium.

1 hour ago, Andy North said:

I could be wrong but I thought it was a precondition of the sale that there had to be new stadium.

News to me. There was a commitment (or requirement?) to spend a specified sum on infrastructure.

All this talk of not enough room??

Didn’t Roman have the plans and planning permission to build a new stadium at the bridge so yes it can be done. They just refuse to have anything to do with something or someone associated with the old regime which is pathetic.

Now if ur talking 100k stadium, reduced ticket pricing, cheap tickets for kids etc etc the fans might get behind it otherwise no way. I know it ain’t gonna happen but I can dream.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.
Background Picker
Customize Layout

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.