That's bullsh*t it came off Fabinho

Wtf is VAR doing having a tommy tit ?

 

Football is dead, how they think that's offside when they fully ignored 1 defender and focused on Van Dijk....

That should of been a goal!

VAR bottled it.

I thought that would be given ... came off Liverpool p;layer but I guess ruled as "accidental" ... another one of those sh*te rules the modern game has come up with ... 

Hilarious defending though, 5 players couldn’t get it away 

Sigh…sponniest team I’ve ever seen.

VAR saving Liverscum arse yet again. Disgraceful 

6 minutes ago, sonic90 said:

That must be a goal

 

What’s the rule that Could justify this Var decision?

Fabinho deliberately went to play the ball so it wasn’t an accident.

If it didn’t fall to Benzema they would of been praising him for a good block so it’s not accidental.

It came off 2 Liverpool players.

 

Edited May 28, 20224 yr by 2211

According just now to BT Sport, the game was delayed as "fans struggled to get in"!

I've switched off. Not interested in watching this blatant corruption and match fixing.

Every time with this lot. 

4 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

 

What's your explanation

I don't really understand why that goal got ruled out unless Benzema was offside with the original pass. When the ball eventually came back to him he was offside but it came from a Liverpool player.

4 minutes ago, sonic90 said:

What's your explanation

Liverpool are very lucky/cheat.

Any goals scored against Liverpool have got to be so pure and clean from any controversy it gives them an advantage.

It doesn’t work both way either, no other team would of been given that penalty they received away at Palace.

The decisions they get in their favour is borderline corruption.

I have a question. If Benzema's goal was offside, why wasn't Giroud's overhead kick for us last season against Atletico Madrid?

This is the ONLY picture that was shown from the "VAR decision". What does this even mean? Benzema in comparison to Van Dijk is offside? How about Robertson there, he doesn't count?

5 minutes ago, 2211 said:

Any goals scored against Liverpool have got to be so pure and clean from any controversy it gives them an advantage.

It doesn’t work both way either, no other team would of been given that penalty they received away at Palace.

The decisions they get in their favour is borderline corruption.

They looked at like 4 different parts of that goal lol 

The lesson here really is that Real should attack Liverpool’s left-hand side more.

Just now, Gol15 said:

This is the ONLY picture that was shown from the "VAR decision". What does this even mean? Benzema in comparison to Van Dijk is offside? How about Robertson there, he doesn't count?

No he counts as goalkeeper as the keeper is in front of defenders 

The fact that nobody is questioning this just shows how everyone are just so willing to comply, let's move on our braindead society... I can understand "the hand of God", I can understand 1966 final, but I can't understand that this is still happening in 2022.

16 minutes ago, Mod said:

According just now to BT Sport, the game was delayed as "fans struggled to get in"!

3 minutes ago, azpi28 said:

No he counts as goalkeeper as the keeper is in front of defenders 

Then they should have shown the goalkeeper, not a random defender. This is just common sense, I'm asking for something so normal to be shown, show why do you think this is offside... They are literally focusing on Van Dijk's heel there for no reason.

Edited May 28, 20224 yr by Gol15