I wonder when the calls for this match to be replayed will start? Or perhaps they will be it should be restarted at the 90th min after the disallowed goal? Its coming folks.

Rice and Moyes get unpunished from their comments on the call. I guess that is in line with Tuchels sideline ban and penalty. 

47 minutes ago, evissy said:

Rice and Moyes get unpunished from their comments on the call. I guess that is in line with Tuchels sideline ban and penalty. 

Right? Blatantly wrong call by ref and VAR ref goes against Chelsea and costs us two points, our manager angry at decision and the refs, so are our players, manager gets ban and fine, we get a token "oh yeah, my bad" from Mike Dean. Nation laughs.

Blatantly wrong call by ref and VAR ref goes in Chelsea's favour and gains us 2 points, their manager angry at decision and the refs, so are their players, they relieve no punishment, already have PGMOL admitting mistake, likely formal apology coming. Nation is outraged.

But yeah, nothing at all to do with Chelsea bias there...

My mate just sent me this bloody hilarious 😂

 

16 hours ago, axman2526 said:

I wonder when the calls for this match to be replayed will start? Or perhaps they will be it should be restarted at the 90th min after the disallowed goal? Its coming folks.

We got lucky there. Not because of VAR but because if he  doesn't leave his leg in then that goal stands and it's another terrible result.

as it is VAR discussions are obscuring another insipid display and tragic defending.

But plus point was Ben and Broja, so pleased for Ben and a terrific goal and assist too.

Hope we can back on track pretty soon 

Come on you BLUES !

 

Match to be replayed? Restarted at 90th minute at 2-2? Or us to be deducted 2 points and West Ham given 1? Or maybe all 3 points go to them?

Let's see.

The match will never be replayed. Guaranteed. Chelsea along with every other club would be looking to reopen previous bad VAR decisions. It's a can of worms.

 

12 hours ago, axman2526 said:

Match to be replayed? Restarted at 90th minute at 2-2? Or us to be deducted 2 points and West Ham given 1? Or maybe all 3 points go to them?

Let's see.

@axman2526 Stop obsessing and scaring me with replay talk 

 

37 minutes ago, Zeta said:

 

At least it was a striker 

I wonder what those fans are thinking. 

19 hours ago, mojo said:

 

I didn't get Souness's point about showing six studs, saw a shot looking like his right foot collided with Mendy's ribs and then the left brushes over him.

Does Souness mean he threatened to go in with studs and pulled out or he actually used them?

 

1 hour ago, strider6004 said:

I didn't get Souness's point about showing six studs, saw a shot looking like his right foot collided with Mendy's ribs and then the left brushes over him.

Does Souness mean he threatened to go in with studs and pulled out or he actually used them?

 

This one? That's probably what Souness was referring to

That in itself looks like a foul yet not even shown on any VAR review...............

14 minutes ago, Backbiter said:

This one? That's probably what Souness was referring to

Blows Shearer/Moyes theory out of the water, studs on keeper is foul, the only injustice is Bowen should of seen a yellow card as well.

If anyone says that photo doesn't show contact, look at Mendys shirt, Bowens studs have made a pucker, you can clearly see it to the left (as we look) of Bowens boot and underneath.

Case closed.

Waiting for apology from MOTD and PGMOL.

17 minutes ago, strider6004 said:

That in itself looks like a foul yet not even shown on any VAR review...............

There is one piece of footage that picks up his right foot catching Mendy with a glancing blow. No way could Madley have seen it from his position on the field. It's just after 7mins on this clip: