I keep reminding myself.

Arsenal lost yesterday!

Arsenal didn't even score!

Arsenal lost to West Ham!

Arsenal were at home!

Moh showing himself to be the f**kwit he is. Even Arsenal fans turning on him now.

 

 

 

 

get you some popcorn & your sodas...I present to you Claude on Arsenal Fan TV

 

 

this was funny too   i think he might be right!

 

 

Are Arsenal missing something upstairs ? They seem to be the club that the stupid people end up supporting

Ask him if he believe Chelsea played proper football on May 19th, 2012 ;) - I bet he will deny that fact

 

Oh, most definitely.  Defensive football isn't entertaining enough to him.  I tell him it is just as exciting to watch if it's your team (though maybe not if you're neutral).

 

And then I tell him that winning is entertainment enough for me anyway.

That Moh who appears on Arsenal TV is a knob of the highest order. 

 

He forever fixates on spending. I think he might be an accountant by trade... So that probably goes a long way to explaining why he's an insufferable twat. 

 

Anyway, as soon as you start shouting "net spend" at someone as a counter argument, I'm sorry but you've lost. 

 

In 10, 20... 50 years time you'll look back and it will show who the winners were of the trophies, not who had the best accounts department. It's a hollow argument. 

 

Strip away all of the bullsh*t and football is about winning and losing and in the last 15 years Arsenal have done more losing than winning and no amount claiming the moral high ground can change that. 

Oh, most definitely. Defensive football isn't entertaining enough to him. I tell him it is just as exciting to watch if it's your team (though maybe not if you're neutral).

And then I tell him that winning is entertainment enough for me anyway.

Who are you talking about?

Who are you talking about?

My husband - a West Ham fan.  Rob asked if he was giving me stick as they're above us.

kevin de bruyne is supposedly on his way to city by the end of the week according to reports. Every report has to mention "former chelsea" in every single report. It's like every journalist just copys and pastes the same artical.

 

I never rated him anyway. City need alot more than that. I think they will struggle this year. They are an old side who apart from maybe 4 players are an average lot with a manager who's tactics are more suited to the 90's.

I think he'll be a good signing for them, and a definite upgrade on Navas or Nasri.

 

Their front 4 would probably be as good or better than ours after that:

 

Sterling - KDB - Silva

Aguero

My husband - a West Ham fan. Rob asked if he was giving me stick as they're above us.

Ooh, and he thinks entertaining football is more important than winning football?

That Moh who appears on Arsenal TV is a knob of the highest order. 

 

He forever fixates on spending. I think he might be an accountant by trade... So that probably goes a long way to explaining why he's an insufferable twat. 

 

Anyway, as soon as you start shouting "net spend" at someone as a counter argument, I'm sorry but you've lost. 

 

In 10, 20... 50 years time you'll look back and it will show who the winners were of the trophies, not who had the best accounts department. It's a hollow argument. 

 

Strip away all of the bullsh*t and football is about winning and losing and in the last 15 years Arsenal have done more losing than winning and no amount claiming the moral high ground can change that. 

moh was getting lambasted on twitter by united and chelsea fans last night because he was pulling the history doesnt matter card in an argument with the united fans and then slagging off chelsea fans who were jumping in because we have no history lol

 

even liverpool fans were giving him a pasting to the point that he had to retweet a few tweets from his fans who were blindly supporting him to hide the conversation the tweets of him getting completely owned

moh was getting lambasted on twitter by united and chelsea fans last night because he was pulling the history doesnt matter card in an argument with the united fans and then slagging off chelsea fans who were jumping in because we have no history lol

 

even liverpool fans were giving him a pasting to the point that he had to retweet a few tweets from his fans who were blindly supporting him to hide the conversation the tweets of him getting completely owned

 

Basically he's prick. 

 

He tries to come up with an argument to belittle whoever he is referring to regardless of if he contradicts himself. 

 

He just likes to spout off whichever nonsense is going to get him a pat on the pack from fellow Arsenal fans. 

 

At least that Claude fella is focused on his own club and calls it like he sees it. 

Which one is Moh??

Which one is Moh??

 

Asian fella with a face you'd like to slap with a bag of wet sh*t. 

My Chelsea season preview has been posted:

 

http://thisisfutbol.com/2015/08/blogs/chelsea-201516-premier-league-season-preview

 

www.thisisfutbol.com is my mate's site, I thought I should give it a little plug.

 

(Obviously not the right place for it, but it's where I posted the last one)

Which one is Moh??

 

The one who bangs on about how we never let black people on trains. Y'know, the obsessed one.

If City get KDB then their AM depth will be absurd - Silva, Sterling, KDB, Nasri and Navas. That said, I don't see much by way of tracking back and defensive discipline there. Sure, City will probably but 6/7 past a few teams in the PL this sesaon but this still seems like a team that will get found out in big games and in particular in Europe. Pellegrini's lack of tactical nous will see to that.

 

Also signing KDB suggests to me that Yaya may be playing a deeper role this season and/or less games.

But what they need is DMF and I still think they lack in CB, LB. I suppose they could play Toure deeper but I don't think he's very good there.

Edited August 10, 201510 yr by Bobbywoodhogan

If City get KDB then their AM depth will be absurd - Silva, Sterling, KDB, Nasri and Navas. That said, I don't see much by way of tracking back and defensive discipline there. Sure, City will probably but 6/7 past a few teams in the PL this sesaon but this still seems like a team that will get found out in big games and in particular in Europe. Pellegrini's lack of tactical nous will see to that.

 

Also signing KDB suggests to me that Yaya may be playing a deeper role this season and/or less games.

 

Can't see Nasri getting much playing time if they do sign KDB, I think he'll be the one to suffer from that signing. 

 

Navas is all pace no end product... Not a bad player to have coming off the bench but again I can't see him starting many games this season now they have Sterling. 

 

Crazy to think that City might be on the brink of having invested almost £100m on just two players this summer... Meanwhile our spending to date is sitting at a modest £13m. 

Can't see Nasri getting much playing time if they do sign KDB, I think he'll be the one to suffer from that signing. 

 

Navas is all pace no end product... Not a bad player to have coming off the bench but again I can't see him starting many games this season now they have Sterling. 

 

Crazy to think that City might be on the brink of having invested almost £100m on just two players this summer... Meanwhile our spending to date is sitting at a modest £13m. 

Navas gets unfair stick imo, he is a good player just not someone you would want starting all the time which was the problem City had seeing as the other options were poor. I think he was their highest assister last season and got a quite a lot in their title winning season too so he does have the end product. 

 

I think having their spending restricted last season is part of the reason why they are now spending a lot. 

Navas gets unfair stick imo, he is a good player just not someone you would want starting all the time which was the problem City had seeing as the other options were poor. I think he was their highest assister last season and got a quite a lot in their title winning season too so he does have the end product. 

 

I think having their spending restricted last season is part of the reason why they are now spending a lot. 

 

Don't get me wrong, I don't think Navas is a "bad" player as such but as you've said he's not the sort of player you want starting every week. 

 

As an impact sub I think he'll do a bit a damage against tiring legs... Probably one of the few wingers at top four clubs who goes for the byline rather than cutting inside all the time. 

 

Considering we were in the black with our transfer dealings last season and now have a much improved shirt sponsorship and the increased TV money I do find it out how little we've spent (so far) in comparison to City. Could simply be a case that the clubs of the players they've targeted are more open to selling. 

 

I still think they're short of a quality centre back and central midfielder personally. 

New York derby: fans clash.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/football/video/2015/aug/10/new-jersey-red-bulls-new-york-city-fans-clash-ahead-of-derby-video

The last five PL winners have kicked there season off on a Monday night.

The last five PL winners have kicked there season off on a Monday night.

Yeah they said that last season, interesting though.

Edited August 10, 201510 yr by Bobbywoodhogan

New York derby: fans clash.

 

http://www.theguardian.com/football/video/2015/aug/10/new-jersey-red-bulls-new-york-city-fans-clash-ahead-of-derby-video

 

I found this funny about NYCFC - The Retirement home of Manchester City

City wish they had Pirlo