March 16, 20224 yr Just now, bisright1 said: Well that will be the first thing they do, we just aren't able to do it at the moment. 3 are no longer our sponsors, the contract is cancelled, we just can't print new shirts. Not cancelled, suspended. To be honest though, I am hoping once new owners come in that both Chelsea and Three part ways on a mutual agreement. What fan will want to purchase a shirt with them as a sponsor after all of this?
March 16, 20224 yr 16 minutes ago, Scott Harris said: Not cancelled, suspended. To be honest though, I am hoping once new owners come in that both Chelsea and Three part ways on a mutual agreement. What fan will want to purchase a shirt with them as a sponsor after all of this? I want to buy the 2022/23 home shirt with the world champions badge on it, so if that disgusting 3 is back I'll have to live with it. I really want Trivago instead. I wish there is a way to tell Chelsea not to work with Three again, I really wish. Rubbish mobile service anyway.
March 16, 20224 yr Dig deep enough and you will probably find things to offered Woke about any of our potential owners.
March 16, 20224 yr The good news is that the Cubs owner Hoe Ricketts looks to have shot him self in the foot with comments about Muslims. He’s had to apologise so unlikely to be him now.
March 16, 20224 yr Just now, JM7 said: The good news is that the Cubs owner Hoe Ricketts looks to have shot him self in the foot with comments about Muslims. He’s had to apologise so unlikely to be him now. I wonder in relation to 9/11 when did he make that comment.
March 16, 20224 yr 17 minutes ago, chiefBlueCFC said: The Jets franchise is one of the worst -- if not consistently the worst -- in all professional American sports. The Cubs won a world series in 2016, but that was the first in 108 years so neither owner has a history of having teams that consistently win. Plus theres all that racist crap coming out about woody johnson and muslims are his natural enemy or whatever.. just no, all around, just no no no no There are also some old tweets being dug from one of the Ricketts family which do not look good. That being said the Ricketts family is quite large and they have a range of political views. I think the main guy behind the bid is the Cubs owner Tom Ricketts and he is more moderate in his viewpoints.
March 16, 20224 yr 6 minutes ago, axman2526 said: I wonder in relation to 9/11 when did he make that comment. HE made the comments on FEB 4th 2019. He apologized but as also said some controversial things about International Womens day which could be deemed misogynistic . He is a Republican and i guess got emboldened to say such things since they aligned with Trumps rhetoric. He has also donated over 1 billion dollars to charity but people only care about the negatives.
March 16, 20224 yr Several are suggesting the racist/Woken angle, and the BWG "Scrambelling" for other investors, leaves Saudi Media ahead. However if they win we may go bust waiting for them to pass, or fail, the PL for and proper tests. No word on the Turkish businessman either.
March 16, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, The Don Antonio said: HE made the comments on FEB 4th 2019. He apologized but as also said some controversial things about International Womens day which could be deemed misogynistic . He is a Republican and i guess got emboldened to say such things since they aligned with Trumps rhetoric. He has also donated over 1 billion dollars to charity but people only care about the negatives. That is Johnson right? I dont want him as owner for sure. I was more asking about the comment from Joe Ricketts about Muslims.
March 16, 20224 yr 15 minutes ago, forbzy said: There are also some old tweets being dug from one of the Ricketts family which do not look good. That being said the Ricketts family is quite large and they have a range of political views. I think the main guy behind the bid is the Cubs owner Tom Ricketts and he is more moderate in his viewpoints. Indeed, people of that age did have a tendency to views that we now consider racist. Those were different times they grew up in.
March 16, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, axman2526 said: That is Johnson right? I dont want him as owner for sure. I was more asking about the comment from Joe Ricketts about Muslims. that quote was from a leaked e.mail sent by Joe ricketts
March 16, 20224 yr Just now, The Don Antonio said: that quote was from a leaked e.mail sent by Joe ricketts Ah OK fair enough.
March 16, 20224 yr I just don't get a good feeling for our future under BWG. Not just because one is an avid Spud, but another does not even like football and they are apparently scrambling for other investors. That does not hint at long term future secured and stadium developed. Edited March 16, 20224 yr by axman2526
March 16, 20224 yr More and more names appearing now. Personally I just want someone who values winning on the pitch, and is willing to put the money in, and bring in the right people to breed and continue the winning environment Roman has created here. Money is only part of the equation. Roman wasnt perfect, but once we stopped being the club players came to for big wages, we then became the club players came to win trophies. That comes crom the top, its a ruthlessness that the glaziers dont have at united. So i am leaning toward the Saudi's in that regard, because i think if use city and psg, there is quest to be the best in both clubs, even if both havent succeeded in europe yet, (It took us a while too tbh). If not the Saudi's then i think Todd Boehly would also be an excellent owner, as long as he trrats us the same way he has the dodgers. Ive seen a few interviews with him whereby he states he sees the best way to increase revenue is to win. I like that mentality, and I think if any rich billionaire was looking to invest, you have to look at what roman has done. He has invested £1.5b, he has had 20 years enjoying competing and einning major trophies, and if it wasnt for the political climate, he wouldve doubled his money, and left a hero to millions of fans across the world.
March 16, 20224 yr 21 hours ago, abramovich said: This is not about Ukraine really, it's much bigger than that. It's about Russia pushing back against NATO eastward expansion. That's been going on for over 30 years now, since even before the fall of Soviet Union when the US gave guarantees to Gorbachev that should the Soviets allow the reunification of Germany, NATO wouldn't move an inch further. Then Soviet Union fell apart and NATO, while ignoring Russia's protestations, kept absorbing eastern European countries, then Baltic states and eventually it got to Ukraine and that's when all hell broke loose. I'm not trying to justify the war, just pointing out that what's happening is more than just Putin's crazy obsession with Ukraine. Your murdering despot leader is telling the World Ukraine has Nazi nuclear biological warfare, he hardly mentions anything about NATO calling us Western partners, evil little dwarf.
March 16, 20224 yr 32 minutes ago, axman2526 said: Dig deep enough and you will probably find things to offered Woke about any of our potential owners. I'm kinda surprised that for all the dislike of them for how they're running the club, the Glazers get very little heat for their ties George W Bush (own his oil company) and their funding of Trump
March 16, 20224 yr 9 minutes ago, coco said: Your murdering despot leader is telling the World Ukraine has Nazi nuclear biological warfare, he hardly mentions anything about NATO calling us Western partners, evil little dwarf. No one in their sane mind supports the war on ukraine or even any war period. Israel vs Palestine , Saudi vs Yemen but the reality is Putin has been warning about Nato moving eastwards into Russian territory. He is going about it the wrong way with war but the West and NATO are also to blame for gaslighting Ukraine to even think there was a chance they would join NATO
March 16, 20224 yr 5 minutes ago, Zaphod2319 said: Yeah, Ricketts should be done. There are 77 emails and climbing. Except that is Joe Ricketts, and not Tom who I believe is behind the actual bid.
March 16, 20224 yr Just now, forbzy said: Except that is Joe Ricketts, and not Tom who I believe is behind the actual bid. Yeah all depends on of Joe is part of this bid or not. If he is not, no problem. Should you be barred from buying something or getting a job because you dad is a racist bigot? If Joe is a part of this bid he either needs to be removed or then the bid not accepted. Those views no longer have a place in modern society thankfully.
March 16, 20224 yr Tom Ricketts also responded with a statement released to The Athletic, denouncing the statements and noting that his father is not involved in the operations of the Cubs, outside of owning a portion of them: "We are aware of the racially insensitive emails in my father’s account that were published by an online media outlet. Let me be clear: The language and views expressed in those emails have no place in our society. My father is not involved with the operation of the Chicago Cubs in any way. I am trusted with representing this organization and our fans with a respect for people from all backgrounds. These emails do not reflect the culture we’ve worked so hard to build at the Chicago Cubs since 2009."
March 16, 20224 yr The Ricketts are a family trust, I don't think you can exclude any of them. The 2.3B net wealth is attributed to Joe, not Tom. “Tom and his three siblings - Peter, Laura, and Todd - and both of his parents share ownership of the team through their family trust.”
March 16, 20224 yr Is suspicious these thongs about both the Ricketts and Johnson come out at the same time. Could this be an attack set up by a rival, perhaps the BWG consortium?
March 16, 20224 yr 2 minutes ago, axman2526 said: Is suspicious these thongs about both the Ricketts and Johnson come out at the same time. Could this be an attack set up by a rival, perhaps the BWG consortium? It’s suspicious that they both wear thongs…
March 16, 20224 yr 1 minute ago, Munkworth said: It’s suspicious that they both wear thongs… And you said my posts were tedious
Create an account or sign in to comment