August 11, 20232 yr 20 minutes ago, just said: The part of your post I have bolded, if that's true, that is a very, very dangerous game to play. If we continue to dither, and this drags on much longer, there is nothing stopping Caicedo changing his mind about going to Liverpool. What's to say he might not view it as disrespectful that we are not prepared to match their offer? I bet his agent will be whispering in his ear. Personally I wouldn't pay £100 million for Caicedo the same as I wouldn't have paid £100 million for Rice. However, if Boehly, Egbalhi and Pochettino really want him stop dicking around, pay what Brighton want, and get it done. Agreed. Although it doesn't really tally with the update from Sky suggesting we already increased our bid to slightly more than Liverpool's
August 11, 20232 yr Author 6 minutes ago, forbzy said: Agreed. Although it doesn't really tally with the update from Sky suggesting we already increased our bid to slightly more than Liverpool's Aye I doubt Clearlake will be happy at coughing up more than 15mill more than expected.
August 11, 20232 yr 4 minutes ago, axman2526 said: Aye I doubt Clearlake will be happy at coughing up more than 15mill more than expected. it's just money the statement they make is worth it Edited August 11, 20232 yr by azpi28
August 11, 20232 yr 3 hours ago, JM7 said: Boehly & Eghbali have taken over negotiations. Strategic games. Liverpool have not removed their bid for Caicedo. Chelsea want the bid removed, as Caicedo has made it clear he wants to join Chelsea & then Chelsea won’t have to go above Liverpool’s bid. Brighton have asked Liverpool to keep their bid in, so Chelsea forced to bid again. As a retaliation, Chelsea (similar to Liverpool with Caicedo) have put a £50m overall package bid in for Romeo Lavia to Southampton that has been accepted. Chelsea will happily take the player, they love Lavia, but equally they want to try & force Liverpool to remove their bid for Caicedo & instead move for Lavia. Lots of moving parts. Once again, Chelsea would happily take Lavia along with Caicedo, but main focus is Caicedo & Chelsea want Liverpool to remove their bid for him since the player has made it clear he only wants to join Chelsea. Game of chess, similar to Liverpool with Caicedo Why not just match the Liverpool bid of bid a couple £000,000s than Liverpool have? Like someone said it’s a dangerous game. The longer this goes and it could be a decision made in hours or days, we risk Caicedo changing his mind.
August 11, 20232 yr I feel it will be ignorant to be surprised at what happened yesterday. Brighton were greedy, but again we should have gone so high for this player before now. He's worth it. This is why we have decided to use this transfer strategy this summer. Many clubs don't want to sell players to us, we've anticipated this, but we've made sure that Caicedo wants to join us. Whatever any club wants to do about Caicedo, we have made sure he wants us. Liverpool may just try, but he wants Chelsea. There is nothing Brighton can do about it. Weldone Boehly and Winstanley.
August 11, 20232 yr There you have it, 12 hours later looked like we are back in the driving seat 🤫 Only winner out of this saga is Brighton, they ended up getting more than what they expected. I'm happy if Caicedo is a Chelsea player, hardly feel like some kind of victory. With 2 100M+ MF in the team, we need to get back into the CL, unlike the Roman era the investment will be returned
August 11, 20232 yr Author 1 hour ago, azpi28 said: it's just money the statement they make is worth it I doubt their investors agree lol.
August 11, 20232 yr 14 minutes ago, axman2526 said: I doubt their investors agree lol. it's not a short term investment. All of these couple of millions here and there don't mean sh*t.
August 11, 20232 yr brighton only get 80% of that. Ha! so still less than 100 million pounds. we won woooooooo
August 11, 20232 yr Pay it and move on. The joy of singing future Caicedo songs against LFC, perhaps a new verse to accompany Stevie G slipping on his rear end, thats worth over £20M and right up there with a Carabao Cup.
August 11, 20232 yr It's a proper process of price discovery. Liverpool valued him at 110. If we pay a similar amount +- 5% it's hard to argue it's the wrong price. It's where the market for this player is right now. Fans, players and management can be happy that we have paid the market price, not been held to ransom, not done over by Brighton management, not been mugs. Equally Brighton's judgement about the market value of their player was also correct and their decision to hold for the market price vindicated.
August 11, 20232 yr Liverpool were serious enough for Klopp to announce it as a done deal and schedule a medical. Hard to seriously see it as a gigantic stich up.
August 11, 20232 yr Author I wonder how Bloom feels about all this. I doubt he is happy with Caicedos behavior. He may refused to sell to use to spite him. Still gets 110mill from Pool as no way he picks sraying at Brighton over joining them.
August 11, 20232 yr 9 minutes ago, ozboy said: It's a proper process of price discovery. Liverpool valued him at 110. If we pay a similar amount +- 5% it's hard to argue it's the wrong price. It's where the market for this player is right now. Fans, players and management can be happy that we have paid the market price, not been held to ransom, not done over by Brighton management, not been mugs. Equally Brighton's judgement about the market value of their player was also correct and their decision to hold for the market price vindicated. Haha, it really is a perfect, laboratory example. Should be in economics textbooks everywhere from now on! Brighton were gambling that the market would change, and it did, handsomely.
August 11, 20232 yr watch us go back to Brighton next year for Enciso Edited August 12, 20232 yr by azpi28
August 12, 20232 yr 5 minutes ago, SydneyChelsea said: Haha, it really is a perfect, laboratory example. Should be in economics textbooks everywhere from now on! Brighton were gambling that the market would change, and it did, handsomely. It's why I couldn't subscribe to the "we bid £100m and we could have got him if we just did that in June" theory. Had we bid that at an early stage Bloom would have 100% raised the price.
August 12, 20232 yr It’s easy for us to criticise the negotiations. But we don’t really know the full picture Edited August 12, 20232 yr by azpi28
August 12, 20232 yr Author 13 minutes ago, azpi28 said: watch us go back to Brighton next year for Enciso And Ferguson in 2 years.
August 12, 20232 yr 1 minute ago, axman2526 said: And Ferguson in 2 years. 2 players I like Enciso is a nice player to watch
August 12, 20232 yr 33 minutes ago, azpi28 said: imagine if they use this in the announcement Hahah who comes up with this s**t. That’s funny, I’d roll with it Sunday. Come on Chelsea - sign him up, and Lavia! Edited August 12, 20232 yr by PhilH930
August 12, 20232 yr 2 minutes ago, PhilH930 said: Hahah who comes up with this s**t. That’s funny, I’d roll with it Sunday. Come on Chelsea - sign him up, and Lavia! It’s very catchy. It’s been stuck in my head
Create an account or sign in to comment