6 minutes ago, 19seventyone said:

If you think that’s us done for the midfield then you’re clearly wrong.

We will sign at least 1 midfielder and possibly two. Not a chance we go with what we currently have.

Your knitting is in tatters methinks.

2 midfielders! ! . You got any more insider information mate ??

Just now, 19seventyone said:

If you think that’s us done for the midfield then you’re clearly wrong.

We will sign at least 1 midfielder and possibly two. Not a chance we go with what we currently have.

Your knitting is in tatters methinks.

You're behaving as if we have a history under this ownership in improving on the players that we sell. It's even worse now with no Europe along with being limited in the wages the club can offer these footballers.

I'm honestly fed up with the whole let's wait until the end of the window narrative when its completely disingenuous. We've given these directors enough benefit of the doubt already. 4 years of it.

Wharton Lacroix and Rodgers to replace Chalobah Santos Garnacho wouldn’t be bad business imo

1 minute ago, dan_cfc said:

Wharton Lacroix and Rodgers to replace Chalobah Santos Garnacho wouldn’t be bad business imo

I'll eat my hat if we get 2 of the 3.

At this rate even 1 of the 3 would be too good to be true.

16 minutes ago, dan_cfc said:

It’s the beginning of July, Alonso hasn’t even started yet,

Exactly!

He was sold the day before Alonso started by design.

He didn’t even have a chance to meet him let alone see him play.

While briefings will undoubtedly say Alonso will get a chance look at his squad before deciding, this sale goes against any yarn they will spin in the coming days.

Chelsea have just conveniently announced Quenda joining minutes after agreeing to sell Santos.

It’s actually insulting that they think they can balance out the bad news of Santos going with buying another untested in this league youngster in a deal that we all knew about months ago!

They take us fans for idiots.

Chances are the “new” midfielder they have alluded to all summer is gonna end up being Barca from Strasbourg.

Edited yesterday at 17:551 day by 2211

Still not seeing this with Santos, if he was that great he'd have played more. Not seen him deliver anything in a single game for Chelsea that is a game changer.

I will hold all judgement on this decision until we see who we sign. If losing Santos means we sign someone ready made to partner Caicedo, I will be happy.

So who's the next player to get transferred for showing up BlueCo poster boy Fernandez for the bang average midfielder he is ?

KDH gone, Santos going. If Essugo does anything this season he's next LOL. Lavia probably won't play enough to enable a decision on him :-)

2 minutes ago, bisright1 said:

Still not seeing this with Santos, if he was that great he'd have played more. Not seen him deliver anything in a single game for Chelsea that is a game changer.

I will hold all judgement on this decision until we see who we sign. If losing Santos means we sign someone ready made to partner Caicedo, I will be happy.

A youngster like Santos wasn't going to start many games over Fernandez and Caicedo

1 minute ago, 2211 said:

Exactly!

He was sold the day before Alonso started by design.

He didn’t even have a chance to meet him let alone see him play.

While briefings will undoubtedly say Alonso will get a chance look at his squad before deciding, this sale goes against any yarn they will spin in the coming days.

There is absolutely zero chance Alonso wasn't fine with this decision.

We need to stop this idea that everything we don't like was something Alonso didn't like either. He is part of the leadership team. He is partly responsible for every outgoing and every incoming transfer.

Alonso needs to see a player in training before he can make a proper decision? Then why are you making a call on him?

10 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

You're behaving as if we have a history under this ownership in improving on the players that we sell. It's even worse now with no Europe along with being limited in the wages the club can offer these footballers.

I'm honestly fed up with the whole let's wait until the end of the window narrative when its completely disingenuous. We've given these directors enough benefit of the doubt already. 4 years of it.

What’s more disingenuous?

Acting as if the players you mentioned were what we are going with next season or waiting to see who we actually f**king sign?

7 minutes ago, dan_cfc said:

Wharton Lacroix and Rodgers to replace Chalobah Santos Garnacho wouldn’t be bad business imo

Of course it wouldn't be bad business. But why does anyone believe that's a possibility?

Can't see it mate, but would be delighted if it actually happened

8 minutes ago, dan_cfc said:

Wharton Lacroix and Rodgers to replace Chalobah Santos Garnacho wouldn’t be bad business imo

We finish 10th, and the answer to improve for next season is to sign a couple of players who took their team to 15th LOL. Rogers won't come when he can stay at Villa and compete properly for Top 4 and Champions League (and where does he even play when we have Palmer and Enzo is probably still here ?)

Just now, The Rising Sun said:

A youngster like Santos wasn't going to start many games over Fernandez and Caicedo

Santos is one year younger than Elliot Anderson. He absolutely could have forced his way into the team if he was good enough. A manager who loved him at Strasbourg came in. He just simply didn't kick on. We don't know why, but he has never delivered a MOTM performance for us.

He stated 13 games in the premier league last year, I don't remember a single great performance.

United are gambling that we've held him back Let them gamble.

2 minutes ago, bisright1 said:

There is absolutely zero chance Alonso wasn't fine with this decision.

We need to stop this idea that everything we don't like was something Alonso didn't like either. He is part of the leadership team. He is partly responsible for every outgoing and every incoming transfer.

You honestly believe this??

It’s common knowledge that Alonso didn’t demand to be called manager, it was the board’s idea.

Because they think we are gullible.

6 minutes ago, bisright1 said:

Alonso needs to see a player in training before he can make a proper decision? Then why are you making a call on him?

What??

Because I’ve seen him play for us in the Premier League for us and is a decent player with a high ceiling and think it’s a bad bit of business.

6 minutes ago, Sexyfootball said:

We finish 10th, and the answer to improve for next season is to sign a couple of players who took their team to 15th LOL

Wharton is quite literally one of the most promising young midfielders in the league and Lacroix is far better than anything we currently have.

7 minutes ago, bisright1 said:

There is absolutely zero chance Alonso wasn't fine with this decision.

We need to stop this idea that everything we don't like was something Alonso didn't like either. He is part of the leadership team. He is partly responsible for every outgoing and every incoming transfer.

Alonso needs to see a player in training before he can make a proper decision? Then why are you making a call on him?

None of us know whether Alonso was fine with this decision or not.. .

It's too early for you to confidently say he's ok with this. He has an " input" on transfer decisions. The final decisions are still made by the usual suspects.

Just now, 2211 said:

You honestly believe this??

It’s common knowledge that Alonso didn’t demand to be called manager, it was the board’s idea.

Because they think we are gullible.

What??

Because I’ve seen him play for us in the Premier League for us and is a decent player with a high ceiling and think it’s a bad bit of business.

Its not common knowledge at all. You've just decided that's the case from I assume Reddit comments.

"He has a high ceiling" is just admitting he's not performed yet but you hope he will. We've been given 50m for a player that might improve but has been average for us. But if you're able to make that call without ever seeing him in training, why does Alonso need to see him in training?

I expect they need this money and sign someone who will improve us. Not someone who we hope will.

Edited yesterday at 18:081 day by bisright1

1 minute ago, dan_cfc said:

Wharton is quite literally one of the most promising young midfielders in the league and Lacroix is far better than anything we currently have.

Which makes it highly unlikely they'll want to come to Chelsea

9 minutes ago, The Rising Sun said:

Of course it wouldn't be bad business. But why does anyone believe that's a possibility?

Can't see it mate, but would be delighted if it actually happened

Who knows with our board mate, I didn’t see Alonso being a possibility either though, and with the manager title I’m fairly confident we will get a few decent signings in before the season starts.

3 minutes ago, The Rising Sun said:

None of us know whether Alonso was fine with this decision or not.. .

It's too early for you to confidently say he's ok with this. He has an " input" on transfer decisions. The final decisions are still made by the usual suspects.

I'm fine with saying "we don't know" but it's a lot more likely Alonso signed off on this than saying Alonso is going to very unhappy with this.

Just now, dan_cfc said:

Who knows with our board mate, I didn’t see Alonso being a possibility either though, and with the manager title I’m fairly confident we will get a few decent signings in before the season starts.

Let's hope so mate 👍

19 minutes ago, 19seventyone said:

Chill Winston!

I’ll get angry when the window shuts and we haven’t upgraded.

But I’m not going to whinge on the first week of July. That would be an overreaction wouldn’t you say?

No, not at all in fact, not when you consider what has happened in the 4 years before it.

29 minutes ago, dan_cfc said:

Wharton Lacroix and Rodgers to replace Chalobah Santos Garnacho wouldn’t be bad business imo

Wake up Dan. Lol. Nice to dream though 😆

We have to accept we f**ked up so many things for the past four years and we have come to the point of having to sell in order to buy some more and give Alonso the chance to fix this club.

Andrey Santos, tidy little player with room to improve if he unlocks his passing range. For the moment very limited, good in tight spaces, but that's about it. Keeps it way too simple and does not take any risks with his passes which is not good enough for a big club. But if he improves in that aspect he has the potential to become a decent player.

50M way too good to pass up.

5 minutes ago, bisright1 said:

Its not common knowledge at all. You've just decided that's the case from I assume Reddit comments.

"He has a high ceiling" is just admitting he's not performed yet but you hope he will. We've been given 50m for a player that might improve but has been average for us. But if you're able to make that call without ever seeing him in training, why does Alonso need to see him in training?

I expect they need this money and sign someone who will improve us. Not someone who we hope will.

And what in our club management's recent track record convinced you this is what's going to happen? Everything they've done so far suggests the opposite.

I doubt people are upset about selling Santos because they rate him so highly. If we were getting a top class midfielder to take his place most wouldn't give a solitary f**k about him leaving. In fact that's how you're supposed to act as a top club, constantly looking to uprgade your first eleven and your squad. The problem is, we know how our current hierarchy operates and there's next to zero chance of us signing a top level replacement.

Edited yesterday at 18:281 day by abramovich