March 11Mar 11 Please just go.He is not up to it and will never reach what the clubs needs to reach.he is worse than maresca by miles.Can’t believe we have a coach of this caliber, gone are the days of us looking for big and serious coaches with experience
March 11Mar 11 11 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:Not sure getting spanked 5-2 and spending £2.5bn only to go backwards has us close to being an outstanding team.You are not going to win anything when you regularly let in 2 or more goals in a game. Even looking past tonight, we are incapable of keeping clean sheets in most games.
March 11Mar 11 Author If he feels the mot important thing to a keeper is his ability to play line breaking passes would be good to have someone ask him why he does not play Reece as our keeper.
March 11Mar 11 17 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:Not sure getting spanked 5-2 and spending £2.5bn only to go backwards has us close to being an outstanding team.We are close to being an outstanding team though. We dominated a lot of the game only to be let down by the reason we aren't an outstanding team, and that's the goalkeeping and defender choices we have. But Rosenior has to take accountability for the subs and the obsession with playing out from the back no matter what, sometimes it's ok to just boot it up ffs.
March 11Mar 11 4 minutes ago, timetowaste said:We are close to being an outstanding team though. We dominated a lot of the game only to be let down by the reason we aren't an outstanding team, and that's the goalkeeping and defender choices we have. But Rosenior has to take accountability for the subs and the obsession with playing out from the back no matter what, sometimes it's ok to just boot it up ffs.No. We aren’t. A great team challenges for the league and champions league. This squad is incapable of doing either let alone both.
March 11Mar 11 24 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:Not sure getting spanked 5-2 and spending £2.5bn only to go backwards has us close to being an outstanding team.What the f**k is he talking about FFS
March 11Mar 11 5 minutes ago, timetowaste said:We are close to being an outstanding team though. We dominated a lot of the game only to be let down by the reason we aren't an outstanding team, and that's the goalkeeping and defender choices we have. But Rosenior has to take accountability for the subs and the obsession with playing out from the back no matter what, sometimes it's ok to just boot it up ffs.You play to your weaknesses surely? Sanchez is the better option of our 2 goalkeepers but he is not comfortable with the ball at his feet. So you pick the best option of your keepers, and don't play a system that requires him to be a sweeper.
March 11Mar 11 2 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:No. We aren’t.A great team challenges for the league and champions league. This squad is incapable of doing either let alone both.Agreed. We are probably on a par with Brentford right now. Which is about where we are in the table.
March 11Mar 11 4 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:No. We aren’t.A great team challenges for the league and champions league. This squad is incapable of doing either let alone both.Which is why we aren't there yet, but we're about 3 signings away from being able to do so imo. Whether or not the board are capable of making the correct decision and to rectify their experience since mistakes is another conversation.
March 11Mar 11 4 minutes ago, forbzy said:You play to your weaknesses surely? Sanchez is the better option of our 2 goalkeepers but he is not comfortable with the ball at his feet. So you pick the best option of your keepers, and don't play a system that requires him to be a sweeper.I wouldn't disagree with that
March 11Mar 11 Just now, timetowaste said:Which is why we aren't there yet, but we're about 3 signings away from being able to do so imo. Whether or not the board are capable of making the correct decision and to rectify their experience since mistakes is another conversation.3 signings away from challenging on all fronts?Sorry mate I can’t agree with that. Especially with how inexperienced our manager is.
March 11Mar 11 7 minutes ago, timetowaste said:We are close to being an outstanding team though. We dominated a lot of the game only to be let down by the reason we aren't an outstanding team, and that's the goalkeeping and defender choices we have. But Rosenior has to take accountability for the subs and the obsession with playing out from the back no matter what, sometimes it's ok to just boot it up ffs.Palmer, JP(on form) , Estevao, Caicedo, Santos, Lavia(if healthy), Reece(if healthy) are Top 4, title challenge material. Enzo, Gusto, Cucu, Garnacho, Hato - works well in the right system and has workable limitations. The rest are pretty much garbage if the aim is Top 4 and CL.
March 11Mar 11 24 goals conceded in 16 games since he took over."We were 8th when I took over, now we're in the race for 4th"d**khead, puppet. Edited March 11Mar 11 by Scott Harris
March 11Mar 11 10 minutes ago, Scott Harris said:24 goals conceded in 16 games since he took over."We were 8th when I took over, now we're in the race for 4th"d**khead, puppet.Pretty sure we would have been no worse off under Maresca. The improvement in league position was largely down to a favorable run of matches against struggling teams and we only squeaked through a number of them.
March 11Mar 11 Author Now how is it a numpty like myself can see so clearly Jorgensen is a bum, and disaster many knew was going to happen tonight, yet our highly paid head coach thought it was a good idea to start him?Don't matter Sanchez is an average goalkeeper with brainfarts in him, Jorgensen is a poor keeper who messes up constantly.So how can this idiot see what's so obvious from just TV and internet clips but Rosenior who takes training and has access to state of the art equipment cannot see it?Or was this the call of brain dead Eghbali, tweedal Winstanley and Tweedal Stewart?
March 11Mar 11 1 hour ago, BordeauxBlue said:Kvara cost as much as Pedro Neto.We would have had him for less since Napoli wanted Lukaku in the 2024 summer, and at a comparable wage. 1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:Brighton fans, hell, even every neutral that's watched Brighton would tell you Sanchez is poor with his feet.Yet the sporting directors get hard for anything related to Brighton and looked past that.It depends what you mean by "with feet" and by playing out the back. Potter initially promoted Sanchez because he was much better at passing out the back than Maty Ryan or Jason Steele, and it was then that Sanchez made his name. He is, in fact, a very good long passer, and actually has great control of backpasses.Sanchez fell out of favour under de Zerbi, because de Zerbi wanted him to hold the ball and play short passes. Then we bought him and three managers tried to make him do the same thing for some reason.
March 11Mar 11 I understand LR dropping Sanchez. The result couldve been the same with him in goal. I understand JP and CP being subbed. We were playing great as a team and morale was high.I don't understand why he instructs the keeper to focus on playing out from the back unless the cost of error is less than 5%. All that hard work undone for crap tika taka in and around our own box. Keeper should also have a brain cell too. If we continue to play like this, i want him gone.
March 12Mar 12 1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:Even thick Malo Gusto thought it was strange.I would even question why we chased the game at 3-2 with under 10 mins left. At that point see it out and take a narrow defeat back to the Bridge.
March 12Mar 12 That was hard to watch. We weren’t that bad but make stupid mistakes and can never play 90 mins. It’s a game of margins and we are repeatedly on the wrong side. It’s getting old. They just don’t learn - the players, coaches and manager. Same nonense. The sad thing is I’m not even that bothered when we play. The last five games I’ve not watch live - that’s the first in 40 years for me.
March 12Mar 12 6 hours ago, dansubrosa said:The harsh reality is our squad isn’t good enough to compete with the best in Europe.Not sure I agree with this, I personally think that our chance to win cl (before the last 10 min of PSG game) is much bigger than PL.We can compete against anybody but I can't see this team be consistent for 30+ games. Edited March 12Mar 12 by Bob stark
March 12Mar 12 One of the things I just can’t wrap my head around, is that if you decide to make Jørgensen nr 1 before prior to Villa why the hell do you play Sanchez vs Wrexham? Probably wouldn’t make too much of a difference, but Jørgensen has barely played for two years so surely you give him game time if you know he is to play vs PSG? Its not the biggest of issues, but it just seems there are a number of these instances where we just refuse to do the sensible thing
March 12Mar 12 5 hours ago, SydneyChelsea said:We would have had him for less since Napoli wanted Lukaku in the 2024 summer, and at a comparable wage.It depends what you mean by "with feet" and by playing out the back. Potter initially promoted Sanchez because he was much better at passing out the back than Maty Ryan or Jason Steele, and it was then that Sanchez made his name. He is, in fact, a very good long passer, and actually has great control of backpasses.Sanchez fell out of favour under de Zerbi, because de Zerbi wanted him to hold the ball and play short passes. Then we bought him and three managers tried to make him do the same thing for some reason.Boom. Bang on. This is it exactly.There are so many lazy comments and false impressions made by commentators and pundits. This tactic has never been shown to work anywhere at a serious level.Every keeper is comfortable with the ball at their feet to a degree cos they're professionals but what does that mean? People cite Man City and Ederson as the origin of defensive inclusion of the keeper. Not in this way though. Ederson was great with the ball at his feet, but very rarely took stupid chances.I agree with you, Sanchez is better with the ball than Jorgensen, providing he is allowed to play the mid and long passes that he is good at along with simple recycling. The only time he falls apart is when he is called upon to play a short baiting game.This manager, along with every other failing manager that does this , insists on playing a baiting press system. Where has this ever been a thing. Brighton. To what level though?We did okay last night for periods, because PSG were statues and let us move through them. As soon as Kvara came on and they tightened the press it was inevitable that this poor quality keeper would get found out again. Not because of how comfortable he is with the ball but simply because he isn't a footballer. He doesn't have the required level of decision making. He's not having air shots, mis-hitting the ball. No this is just crap pass selection.This press bait bo**ocks cannot be successful on a sustainable level. Tactically its the defensive equivalent of doing a Panenka. If all you did was a Panenka at every penalty how long before it got rumbled and compensated for.
Create an account or sign in to comment