January 17, 20188 yr 1 hour ago, Bobbywoodhogan said: I think we should have gone for Walcott instead of Carrol What? No way. Walcott is even worse.
January 18, 20188 yr 17 hours ago, Bobbywoodhogan said: I think we should have gone for Walcott instead of Carrol Edited January 18, 20188 yr by robdog
January 18, 20188 yr I just wathded Wise and Bellamy on the Debate and both agreed Carrol isn’t right for Chelsea. Bellamy even said in a roundabout way that he’s lazy. Walcott at least has pace and a little versatility.
January 18, 20188 yr If Defoe wasn't injured i would still take him over Carroll, Defoe will shoot from any distance.
January 19, 20188 yr On 1/17/2018 at 21:56, Bobbywoodhogan said: I think we should have gone for Walcott instead of Carrol Imagine Conte going to the board and saying he wants a target man and they sign Walcott for him. May as well just sack him now.
January 20, 20188 yr On paper it's a tough game away at Burnley, but in reality I think they'll win comfortably, probably 3-0, with goals from Pogba, Lukaku and some defender.
January 20, 20188 yr 4-0 with only 22 minutes played. Makes me more annoyed when we don't turn up against these types of teams.
January 20, 20188 yr 2 minutes ago, Londonisblue said: they won't win you'll see. I hold you to that mate........they better not lose to these f**king scum for a 3ird time this season.........man utd are just so boring its crazy.
January 20, 20188 yr Even though Matic is playing for United now, i did smile when i seen him barge Ashley Barnes to floor
Create an account or sign in to comment