Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Shed End - Chelsea FC Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

BlueCo buy Chelsea FC

Featured Replies

My only hope is that we get a  new owner(s) that care about football and the club and do as good an ownership job as Abramovitch has done over the past 19 years. If its going to be done lets hope for a good result. There is a tendency to look back in life and feel sad and sentimental but its the next goal and not the last one that matters.

I agree with the sky sports article that selling is easy on paper but completing the sale and abramovitch getting the money will be difficult. It may well be that the trust or something continues to manage the club, abramovitch continues as the legal owner but a separate financial agreement offshore means that financial ownership and underlying management go to the new buyers. Or something like that.

44 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

What he said?

Wyss, Boehly and 2 or 3 others definitely in the running, funds all secured, boehly will be the front man, he will be the one chucking most of the money into the team etc

American Bank also interested, but identity unknown

 

FWIW i definitely think there is other bids, and identity wil be known soon; and i think they may even beat Wyss/Boehly to the punch, but they'll need to be quick as those 2 are out in front.  Be interesting to see if the other 2 or 3 with Boehly and Wyss are also multi billionaires....

57 minutes ago, JM7 said:

Matt Law has done an interesting podcast on “London is Blue”. He is very close to the club and has insider knowledge. Worth a listen. 

this is one hell of a teaser 

 

5 hours ago, Gol15 said:

The Mansour Group doesn't have as big of a net worth to simply pay 3billion like it's nothing in order to be the new owners so if they buy I doubt we would see any more big transfers in the next few years, sorry future Lukakus but your time is up.

Thank f**k for that.

13 minutes ago, RickUK said:

Wyss, Boehly and 2 or 3 others definitely in the running, funds all secured, boehly will be the front man, he will be the one chucking most of the money into the team etc

American Bank also interested, but identity unknown

 

FWIW i definitely think there is other bids, and identity wil be known soon; and i think they may even beat Wyss/Boehly to the punch, but they'll need to be quick as those 2 are out in front.  Be interesting to see if the other 2 or 3 with Boehly and Wyss are also multi billionaires....

Seems there is quite a demand for us.

That is interesting given we make losses each year and our stadium issues.

4 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

Seems there is quite a demand for us.

That is interesting given we make losses each year and our stadium issues.

It's like these massive super yachts, they lose money, a £300m yacht has running costs of 10% or £30m per year, they don't care.

16 minutes ago, coco said:

It's like these massive super yachts, they lose money, a £300m yacht has running costs of 10% or £30m per year, they don't care.

True someone like Roman does not but surley someone looking to make money back does.

The stadium alone could cost 2bill now

Got a bad feeling about the swiss/American bid. 

Swiss guy is 86, and Boehly already has his hands full with dodgers and lakers, how much interest is he really going to have in seeing Chelsea compete?

Really struggling with all this. I dont see a particularly bright future ahead. Most likely drop out of the top echelon over next 5 years. 

None of these prospective buyers seem like they will want to or be able to compete with City and United financially, and when you throw in Newcastle, and a Liverpool which seems to found a successful sustainable operating system, it really is going to be tough going to stay in the Champions League, let alone win it again. 

Sorry for the negativity.

7 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

True someone like Roman does not but surley someone looking to make money back does.

The stadium alone could cost 2bill now

How would a buyer go about making money on Chelsea?

I dont think they can do what the Glazer's have done, because we dont bring in enough revenue. 

We generally operate at a loss as it is, they would have to cut the wage bill significantly whilst maintaining a top 4 level side, if we drop further down the table, they miss out on Champions League revenue, and the asset they bought for £2B depreciates. 

Ive seen a lot of people fear this, but im more fearful that someone will buy it with good intentions, but fall short on ambition, or make horrible decisions at board level. 

Im not sure Chelsea with its price tag and revenue is appealing offer for anyone trying to make money. 

We’re never going to get an owner as good as Roman but we’re still incredibly lucky to have witnessed all of the success past two decades. Whatever happens in the future, Chelsea will always be here, wether they’re fighting for a trophy or promotion.

3 minutes ago, Mário César said:

City, Liverpool and United has loss also?

City dont care about any losses.

Liverpool generally break even.

United earn ridiculous amounts of money through revenue, so can spend more, although their owners use chunks of revenue to pay off the debt they took out to finance the club, whilst also collecting dividends. United is a plc, so im not sure how differently things are for them being on the stock market.

The only reason we kept up financially is vecause Roman balances the books. Maybe if we scouted better he wouldnt have to.

We have a problem arising this summer at centre back potentially losing 3 quality players for free, so i guess we will find out pretty quickly whether the new owners are willing to fund a signing or 2 to try and give Tuchel a squad to compete. 

3 minutes ago, big blue said:

The only reason we kept up financially is vecause Roman balances the books. Maybe if we scouted better he wouldnt have to.

I think you could put all our losses down over the years to maybe 10-12 bad signings (Roman trying to play fantasy football), costing around 1/2 billion, players most of us fans could tell would be a failure.

1 minute ago, coco said:

I think you could put all our losses down over the years to maybe 10-12 bad signings (Roman trying to play fantasy football), costing around 1/2 billion, players most of us fans could tell would be a failure.

That and not just letting players like Bakas contracts run down.

4 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

That and not just letting players like Bakas contracts run down.

Yeah i didnt even figure in salary cost just transfer cost, i bet with salary costs its 1 billion. i think we can say for sure we need to spend wisely from now on.

Just now, coco said:

Yeah i didnt even figure in salary cost just transfer cost, i bet with salary costs its 1 billion. i think we can say for sure we need to spend wisely from now on.

We can but hope we see some wiser investment, maybe we even get a top level director of football or maybe Cech is promoted to that role.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 1

Background Picker
Customize Layout

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.