2 minutes ago, doctorblue said:

Well I have a colleague who's a proctologist and I'm sure he can help stick your moralistic outrage where the sun don't shine...let me know...thanks

Not sure why you're being this defensive. The language you used earlier is quite childish. Nothing wrong with admitting it's needless and sticking to matured words.

3 minutes ago, Barrettinator said:

Not sure why you're being this defensive. The language you used earlier is quite childish. Nothing wrong with admitting it's needless and sticking to matured words.

It's my theory that both aggressiveness and passive aggressiveness are used by people who can't stand being called out, and can't admit that the other person has a point. I think we've seen another prime example to support my theory.

1 hour ago, Valerie said:

It's my theory that both aggressiveness and passive aggressiveness are used by people who can't stand being called out, and can't admit that the other person has a point. I think we've seen another prime example to support my theory.

Well there's good news for you too...I have another colleague who's a clinical psychologist who'll glady hear you squawk on with your pyschobabble nonsense all day long...well until your mum says it's time for your fish fingers and chips...

10 minutes ago, doctorblue said:

Well there's good news for you too...I have another colleague who's a clinical psychologist who'll glady hear you squawk on with your pyschobabble nonsense all day long...well until your mum says it's time for your fish fingers and chips...

Thank you for once again supporting my theory 

4 minutes ago, Valerie said:

Thank you for once again supporting my theory 

Anytime Miss 

This place was a lot more peaceful and enjoyable before all of the members who got banned from other Chelsea forums decided to sign up here... Lucky for them the mods on here seem to be more lenient.

Barettinator is just a clown. Plain and simple.

15 minutes ago, Amputechture said:

This place was a lot more peaceful and enjoyable before all of the members who got banned from other Chelsea forums decided to sign up here... Lucky for them the mods on here seem to be more lenient.

Well I'm glad there's room for all types on here...even the hangers on...

Easy people easy. No need to throw daggers. Although Sanchez-topic is the most suitable for it as it is completely unnecessary.

No idea how reliable it is, but found it just a few minutes ago:



http://dailycannon.com/2017/07/alexis-sanchez-open-to-chelsea-move-as-betting-suspended-on-manchester-city-switch/

On July 6, 2017 at 05:27, Jackbuchanan said:

Because he'd struggle to make ends meet on 250k. Pr*ck. 

I don't see how a player cashing in on there talent's makes them a prick, do i love Chelsea ? Absolutely, but if i was a player on 150k a week and i got a sniff that there's potential to triple that i'd be all over it. 

4 hours ago, Argo said:

I don't see how a player cashing in on there talent's makes them a prick, do i love Chelsea ? Absolutely, but if i was a player on 150k a week and i got a sniff that there's potential to triple that i'd be all over it. 

Dont get me wrong, i see why Sanchez wants an increase, he should be on a bit more, as he is worth it, but asking for what was it, 380k? That just stinks of greed, and is a kick in the nuts to the fans whose ticket prices are rising to accommodate for these ridiculous demands. 

Pity Arsenal will never sell him to us, would really fit into the team well at striker. 

It's cheaper to pay him 400k a week than buy a replacement assuming there is one available, that is the the card he is playing.
If they want to keep him and force him to waste a year without champions league then he is pushing them to pay up.
We all know they won't pay and It has nothing to do with being greedy, he is just trying to put them in a position in which they are forced to sell.

                                                        Courtois

 

                        Cahill                           Luiz                       Rudiger

 

Azip                                Kante                         Bakayoko                           Sandro

 

                 Sanchez                      Costa (PLEASE STAY!)         Hazard                     

 

Dreamy!

20 minutes ago, Carefree_OBrien said:

                                                        Courtois

 

                        Cahill                           Luiz                       Rudiger

 

Azip                                Kante                         Bakayoko                           Sandro

 

                 Sanchez                      Costa (PLEASE STAY!)         Hazard                     

 

Dreamy!

What sort of formation is that lmao

58 minutes ago, armansky said:

It's cheaper to pay him 400k a week than buy a replacement assuming there is one available, that is the the card he is playing.
If they want to keep him and force him to waste a year without champions league then he is pushing them to pay up.
We all know they won't pay and It has nothing to do with being greedy, he is just trying to put them in a position in which they are forced to sell.

It's not cheaper to pay him if they get 80 mil replace him for less and pay the new guy less...

1 hour ago, DonAntonio said:

It's not cheaper to pay him if they get 80 mil replace him for less and pay the new guy less...

Which they have done with Lacazette. Sanchez is on his way, but to who remains the question...

Strangely I still think we may be silently in on him.  Maybe watching developments in order to hijack a deal ourselves?

Sure, the will replace their best player with a cheaper player to save some cash making their fans super happy in the process.
That's not going to happen, they need to get the best they can to replace him and that won't be cheap.
The main point remains being Alexis is putting them in a position where is more profitable for them to sell.

Well. We should put in a world record bid for this man now that our striker situation is what it is.

Losing him to city now would just be awful. 

16 hours ago, Andreas said:

Well. We should put in a world record bid for this man now that our striker situation is what it is.

Losing him to city now would just be awful. 

He never was in our grasp, we all fully knew it's going to be almost impossible to sign him from Arsenal. He'd need to hand in transfer request and really push for the move if it were to happen.

City always have been the likeliest destination.

he will probably stay and leave on a free next season. he chooses where he wants to go then and not to pushed into going somewhere he doesn't. 

18 minutes ago, enigma said:

he will probably stay and leave on a free next season. he chooses where he wants to go then and not to pushed into going somewhere he doesn't. 

And get a massive signing on bonus plus enormous wages in lieu of a transfer fee...he could be the first £400k plus a week player on an extended contract...plus Arsenal will bend over backwards to look after him as they need his performances to help them get back into CL either through the league or through Europa Cup...and from his prospective, in a world cup year he's guaranteed regular football in familiar surroundings... 

Edited July 11, 20179 yr by doctorblue

I agree him staying is now the most likely outcome, but now with Bayern signing James surely that only leaves us and City as the potential clubs?

I know it's always going to be hard to get his signature but I can't see why we aren't going all out for him.