10 hours ago, BlueNProud said:

Can't see anything but a loss for the Chels unfortunately. The worst strikers in the league. Abraham is total sh*t. Got a sh*t haircut too.

 

 

Its Azpi again....

Well that was sloppy ....

How did they have about 3/4 players all around Azpi and Christensen with no one coming in to cover them, they had a complete overload on our right hand side.

Just now, coco said:

DAVE NUTMEGGED 1-1

Hero to zero in 60 seconds 

 

Dave playing him on

Not sure what is worse, our defence or having to listen to Chris Sutton for 90 minutes.

Our defence is awful, used to be our main strength now it’s our main weakness.

How is that not enough for VAR to get involved? It’s a blatant foul in the build up to a goal. That is surely the most obvious use for VAR. Properly mental.

Not watching the game, but got a goal alert come on my phone, saw chelsea 1 up, now I read here it's 1-1, bloody hell. 

Frank must be banging his against the wall every night with this defence, shockingly poor but shouldn't be given the experience of the back 4

Foul on Tammy before the goal. 

"there was a foul on Abraham in the build up to the Norwich goal, but not enough for VAR to get involved"

translation - Chelsea player fouled, tough sh*t

1 minute ago, carrickblue said:

"there was a foul on Abraham in the build up to the Norwich goal, but not enough for VAR to get involved"

translation - Chelsea player fouled, tough sh*t

Only played 4 games and we've now been done twice by VAR missing clear and obvious fouls in the build up to a "goal" ...

Edited August 24, 20196 yr by Sexyfootball

Just now, carrickblue said:

"there was a foul on Abraham in the build up to the Norwich goal, but not enough for VAR to get involved"

translation - Chelsea player fouled, tough sh*t

It’s laughable to be honest. Chris Sutton saying it would be harsh? How would it be harsh when it’s a blatant foul. VAR is supposed to make the game fair, Norwich have unfairly got level and they’re saying it would be harsh to make the right decision? Bizarre.

Weve been waiting a few seasons for one of our strikers to score a goal like that, well done Tammy, only your 2nd start and that was a sweet sweet strike.

3 minutes ago, EdinburghBlue said:

How is that not enough for VAR to get involved? It’s a blatant foul in the build up to a goal. That is surely the most obvious use for VAR. Properly mental.

Simply because it happened in favour of the team playing against Chelsea. 

Defence is the big issue at the moment. Rudiger will strengthen it when he returns, but Azpi's form has been a big worry.

Can't question the endeavour of the team though.

no yellow for the double handed pull back is just f**king bad refereeing.

f**k atkinson 

How is that not a yellow card?

And How Is That Not A Yellow Card

1 minute ago, Munkworth said:

Simply because it happened in favour of the team playing against Chelsea. 

These are things that people like Joe Cole should be highlighting on these shows.

 

How the f**k is that not a yellow card? I swear the decision making when it comes to us is f**king disgraceful.

Even Chris ‘anti-chelsea’ Sutton agreed that should have been a card!

this ref is a f**king retard