VAR is a conspiracy to deny Chelsea goals 

That was the ONLY time they pulled it back so far in f**king YEARS

Jason Cundy: "There's a bit of anger in me now."

Edited October 2, 20214 yr by Valerie

Werner isn't back I guess. We're clearly a better team than Southampton even without some of our key players.

This sport is a complete joke at times. That was never a foul by Azpi, it's so f**king soft.

Just now, LongtimerLurker said:

Stream died before the goal ripp, can anyone describe it?

Azpi cross the ball from the right, doesnt reach anyone but Hudson Odoi on the otherside who has all the time in the world to cross then  Werner heads it in.

Didnt count for a foul by azpilicueta.

Good old VAR they can't see a blatent handball vs Arsenal last season in the box but they can give that as a foul brilliant!

Clown of a decision, soft foul and a lot of play transpired defence was reset, absolute fckin nonsense 

No VAR on Lukaku's onside goal but Azpi makes the slightest bit of contact 30 seconds before a goal and they call the whole thing off.

You guys are right EPL refs are terrible 

How tf was that a foul?! soft af 

what happened to this league holy sh*t

After this VAR is gonna go so far back to deny us goals that Osgood would have been playing on the VAR monitor

2 minutes ago, carrickblue said:

VAR is a conspiracy to deny Chelsea goals 

Conspiracy against Werner to damage his confidence 🙂

Chalobah genuinely looks a quality player, from absolutely nowhere as well. 

Brilliant from Tuchel to see it and have faith in him. 

1-0 is undeserved. Really harsh 

We should be up 3-0 

Just now, Deino said:

After this VAR is gonna go so far back to deny us goals that Osgood would have been playing on the VAR monitor

I’ve been calling for the return of Ossie! 

I hope the boys come out angry and destroy them second half 

Our first goal looked offside, our second was offside, our third is 100% a regular goal.

@LongtimerLurker

 

https://www.clippituser.tv/c/lxblaa

Does anybody know how far back they can go in reviewing possible foul prior to goal? Or is it at ref's discretion?

If Ruben can play like this, he can easily beat kova and Jorginho 

1 minute ago, Stas1 said:

Does anybody know how far back they can go in reviewing possible foul prior to goal? Or is it at ref's discretion?

For Chelsea it goes back to kickoff.

1 minute ago, Stas1 said:

Does anybody know how far back they can go in reviewing possible foul prior to goal? Or is it at ref's discretion?

Doesn’t matter if the defence is reset so that there isn’t a clear advantage from the foul goal should stand 

We’ve been at it today. Good first half performance, deserved lead, should be more.

You never see those sort of decisions go against Liverpool, United or City.