I think you've just lost a fan of your writings @loz

2 hours ago, WhiteWall said:

We're you a Chelsea fan originally or are you a Pulisic fan first.

 

12 hours ago, USATim said:

Wow... I am the second most hated American on this site. Interesting.

Your posts have grinded my gears a little recently, especially with comparison on Mount which is nonsense as you’ll know by now. 
 

Also your tone to Gol was totally uncalled for. He tried to reason with you and you acted like a complete arsehole, speaking to him like he’s thick. 

He's been good everytime he got a chance under Potter. Deserves more playtime, especially with how Havertz is performing.

Needs more game time. Looked like 2020 Pulisic in his cameo tonight. 

He came on when we had control of the game, against tired defenders, had one shot, straight at the keeper with the whole goal to aim at.

But i would still give him the start over Sterling at the moment until Raheem gets his act together.

Ironically he was out of position tonight which wipes out a certain someones main excuse for his poor form under TT.

But yes very good tonight, now the challenge is to build to it which is where he has fallen down every time (he's had a good game) since the restart.

Was definately our best player when he came on. Looked to try and make things happen and caused them a few issues. Its a shame he only had havertz to pass to half the time.

Very promising tonight, would be nice if he can keep it up.

Brightest cameo performance from him for a long time. Certainly staking a claim to get a chance ahead of Havertz. In my opinion neither of them are the quality we will be looking for longer term but Pulisic gets the nod ahead of Havertz and Ziyech purely in terms of effort. 

He did well. Would be interesting to see him with Sterling on the other wing and Broja in the middle.

37 minutes ago, Argo said:

Ironically he was out of position tonight which wipes out a certain someones main excuse for his poor form under TT.

But yes very good tonight, now the challenge is to build to it which is where he has fallen down every time (he's had a good game) since the restart.

Quit the bs. Dude needs to be on the field - that's all that needs to be said. You guys always have your snide little comments. If CP plays a full 90 today, Chelsea wins. Period.

14 minutes ago, dansubrosa said:

Very promising tonight, would be nice if he can keep it up.

Needs to have opportunities. Period.

Much better effort from both him and Carney than Havertz. Not that it is hard to do so...

3 minutes ago, Gol15 said:

He did well. Would be interesting to see him with Sterling on the other wing and Broja in the middle.

Agreed. This is what I wanted from the start, with Mount at attacking mid. Good call.

8 minutes ago, USATim said:

Quit the bs. Dude needs to be on the field - that's all that needs to be said. You guys always have your snide little comments. If CP plays a full 90 today, Chelsea wins. Period.

You're on record blaming his performances on Tuchel for playing him out of position. He played out of position tonight.

Just now, Argo said:

You're on record blaming his performances on Tuchel for playing him out of position. He played out of position tonight.

Tuchel played him at LWB. Potter let him roam, which is smart. And you are the guy who constantly says he sucks. Didn't suck tonight now, did he? In fact, if he plays 90, Chelsea wins. Where is our boy Hazardous tonight?

2 minutes ago, USATim said:

Tuchel played him at LWB. 

According to this data he's played LWB once in his entire career.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/christian-pulisic/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/315779

16 minutes ago, USATim said:

Needs to have opportunities. Period.

I think he may well get that under Potter. How many though is enough to evaluate?

If Potter gives him a ten game run then starts benching him cos he is not delivering, is that fair. Some would say there are other players that would deserve that treatment as well but comparing the treatment one player gets against another player deflects from the point a bit. Persoanlly i think a 10 game run in and around the side, in your natural position should be enough to assess.

6 minutes ago, Argo said:

According to this data he's played LWB once in his entire career.

https://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/christian-pulisic/leistungsdatendetails/spieler/315779

That's crap. Anyone who has watched Chelsea under Tuchel knows he played CP at WB numerous times. 

Just now, WhiteWall said:

I think he may well get that under Potter. How many though is enough to evaluate?

If Potter gives him a ten game run then starts benching him cos he is not delivering, is that fair. Some would say there are other players that would deserve that treatment as well but comparing the treatment one player gets against another player deflects from the point a bit. Persoanlly i think a 10 game run in and around the side, in your natural position should be enough to assess.

I thought so too, especially since he scored in his last start. No idea why he didn't start tonight. Thought he has played well under Potter and deserves the minutes. Oh, well. 

Who was your MOTM Tim?

4 minutes ago, Mod said:

Who was your MOTM Tim?

Tim votes for his man of the match before kick off.

2 hours ago, Gol15 said:

He did well. Would be interesting to see him with Sterling on the other wing and Broja in the middle.

 

This I would like to see. Will it happens? Who knows.

12 minutes ago, haviet1 said:

 

This I would like to see. Will it happens? Who knows.

Nope, someone or someones at Chelsea in a position of power thinks Havertz is playing like Kaka rather than Crapa he is.

Edited October 19, 20223 yr by axman2526

7 hours ago, Mod said:

Who was your MOTM Tim?

Kepa