January 17, 20224 yr 7 hours ago, Argo said: The other youngsters forced our hand, he's on a long term deal. In most cases I agree, though we put ourselves in the situation for Tomoroi to leave, along with Tammy. Had they been played often I think they would have signed new deals.
January 17, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, axman2526 said: In most cases I agree, though we put ourselves in the situation for Tomoroi to leave, along with Tammy. Had they been played often I think they would have signed new deals. Tomori did sign a long term deal, we just made a pretty poor deal with Milan. Broja is looking promising, but it wouldve been a mistake to keep him here this season. We already rotate way too mich to try and keep 7 players happy for 3 positions. Broja wouldve barely played so far this season, other than a few cup games, and maybe 1 or 2 starts assuming he avoided covid when half the squad was out with it. Im pretty relaxed about broja, we are in a good position, if we were to sell, it would be on out terms with a buy back option. His stock is only increasing, and premier league teams will now give him the minutes at the highest level he needs to develop. Until we trim that forward line enough so he is going to in the rotation,i would keep him out on loan.
January 17, 20224 yr IF Chelsea sell Broja, then my assessment would be that they seem to truly lack, or have no interest in, any long distance goals
January 17, 20224 yr 3 hours ago, axman2526 said: In most cases I agree, though we put ourselves in the situation for Tomoroi to leave, along with Tammy. Had they been played often I think they would have signed new deals. Abraham played a lot before Tuchel arrived. It was Tuchel's decision to sell Abraham. We didn't sell him because his deal was running out. He wasn't favoured, so made sense for the money we received.
January 17, 20224 yr We sold Tammy, what makes people think that an even younger player will be given a chance, specially now that we signed Lukaku for 5 years?
January 18, 20224 yr 2 hours ago, Gol15 said: We sold Tammy, what makes people think that an even younger player will be given a chance, specially now that we signed Lukaku for 5 years? On that basis Chalobah was never getting a chance because we sold Tomori and Guehi. Edited January 18, 20224 yr by Argo
January 18, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, Argo said: On that basis Chalobah was never getting a chance because we sold Tomori and Guehi. I could be just a matter of being at the right place and at the right time, the formation Tuchel uses requires at least 2 backup CBs and when you look at the squad that's exactly what we have in Sarr and Chalobah but we're using Azpilicueta there too. If the idea is to have Lukaku for 5 years that's not really suitable for a 20-21 year old, it's only 1 spot and Havertz is supposed to be in the middle there too so Broja would be warming the bench instead of scoring goals, this is why Giroud left.
January 18, 20224 yr 7 hours ago, Gol15 said: I could be just a matter of being at the right place and at the right time, the formation Tuchel uses requires at least 2 backup CBs and when you look at the squad that's exactly what we have in Sarr and Chalobah but we're using Azpilicueta there too. If the idea is to have Lukaku for 5 years that's not really suitable for a 20-21 year old, it's only 1 spot and Havertz is supposed to be in the middle there too so Broja would be warming the bench instead of scoring goals, this is why Giroud left. I think they way Tuchel rotates the forward there's room for him to get enough minutes (if he finally makes Lukaku part of the rotation and not an untouchable). With any luck he'd do what Edou did and be so good the expensive one can't get back in.
January 18, 20224 yr I'd be surprised if we sold him. If we need to raise funds sell Timo Werner back to Germany.
January 18, 20224 yr We should keep loaning him out until he reaches his potential, he'd get way more game time that way rather than having to compete with our front line next season
January 18, 20224 yr 4 minutes ago, Drogba1 said: We should keep loaning him out until he reaches his potential, he'd get way more game time that way rather than having to compete with our front line next season He's only started 9 games on loan this season, not exactly way more game time than he would get for us, and the game time he would get with us would be more significant as he would be under Tuchel.
January 20, 20224 yr A bit of noise from Chelsea top brass might alleviate some doubts, as the press seem hellbent on stirring this tasty honey pot…
January 20, 20224 yr 39 minutes ago, Ballack & Blu said: A bit of noise from Chelsea top brass might alleviate some doubts, as the press seem hellbent on stirring this tasty honey pot… Apparently Saints are willing to offer a buy back like we dealt with Roma for Tammy. 25mill fee, buy back option in summer of 2024 for 50mill.
January 22, 20224 yr The way this guy is playing now he'd be our best forward. We'd be idiots to sell him to Southampton even with a buy-back clause. He's causing City all kinds of problems with his speed and power right now.
January 22, 20224 yr 15 minutes ago, Sindre said: The way this guy is playing now he'd be our best forward. We'd be idiots to sell him to Southampton even with a buy-back clause. He's causing City all kinds of problems with his speed and power right now. And he's done all that with his team having a mere 24% possession and not a great deal to go on, strange how he doesn't need perfect conditions to do his job.
January 22, 20224 yr 24 minutes ago, Argo said: And he's done all that with his team having a mere 24% possession and not a great deal to go on, strange how he doesn't need perfect conditions to do his job. Does everything need to be about Lukaku with you? As a matter of fact I think Broja would thrive playing off someone like Lukaku for us. He'd hold up and occupy defenders and Broja could attack the space he left open with his blistering pace. And he'd do a much better job than every single one of our attackers have done so far this season.
January 22, 20224 yr 35 minutes ago, Sindre said: Does everything need to be about Lukaku with you? As a matter of fact I think Broja would thrive playing off someone like Lukaku for us. He'd hold up and occupy defenders and Broja could attack the space he left open with his blistering pace. And he'd do a much better job than every single one of our attackers have done so far this season. For as long as there's anyone blaming others for his lack of workrate and things like touching the ball 8 times in a half, yes if our loanee is showing our record signing how to maximize his ability's then i will absolutely point out. Same way i would if people tried to pin Saul's struggles on Jorgi and Kova only for Gilmour to have a great game for Norwich. If he put himself about, pressed and got involved like Mando did today at The Ethiad last week there's every chance we get a point, if not all three. Edited January 22, 20224 yr by Argo
January 22, 20224 yr 1 hour ago, Sindre said: The way this guy is playing now he'd be our best forward. We'd be idiots to sell him to Southampton even with a buy-back clause. He's causing City all kinds of problems with his speed and power right now. Our board is capable of pretty idiotic things. Whereever Broja ends up he will be a top, top player.
January 22, 20224 yr Author Broja is a very good finisher though still needs to work on interplay, I watched some of the City match. Saints had opportunities and if he had carried the ball a bit further or waited for the pass instead of charging away they might have got all the points. A top prospect for us though still a work in progress and has a better first touch than some of our front men.
January 22, 20224 yr Didnt know he was that fast. He's good but i think another year at Southampton could be the best move for him.
January 22, 20224 yr On 21/01/2022 at 00:02, axman2526 said: Apparently Saints are willing to offer a buy back like we dealt with Roma for Tammy. 25mill fee, buy back option in summer of 2024 for 50mill. so we will pay 50 million for him to play for 2 seasons at the saints while we could just as well let him play there for free and then recall him anyway??? that's throwing away 25 million Edited January 22, 20224 yr by azpi28
Create an account or sign in to comment