Tammy for third goal

Now Tammy. Finish the game. 

My god people having a right go at timo. He is being played out of position by frank. You can’t blame him 

5 goals in 2 games.

1 minute ago, DannyLB said:

Thought Timo was supposed to be clinical? Not impressed by him. 

I don't think anybody has said that. On the contrary....

1 minute ago, Chelsbear said:

Thing is they are established finishers elsewhere. Its our club that seems to be the stumbling block 

He's not been bad, I'm just frustrated. But his finishing has been woeful here, he's missed more sitters than he's scored goals, has to be putting them away. 

Just now, Andy2461 said:

My god people having a right go at timo. He is being played out of position by frank. You can’t blame him 

While that’s true, he’s not out of position when he’s one yard and 6 yards from goal and missing sitters. 

Just now, MayosNoun! said:

Tammy for third goal

Wouldn’t be surprised. Seems like Tammy’s specialty to score that extra goal to relax the fans. 

Just now, Andy2461 said:

My god people having a right go at timo. He is being played out of position by frank. You can’t blame him 

In general yes but when you are in front of goal and a striker then it doesn't matter about where you are being played. Strikers should be able to score at least one of the chances he's had, he's had a mare. 

Just now, Andy2461 said:

My god people having a right go at timo. He is being played out of position by frank. You can’t blame him 

His position for his chance a minute ago was a position a striker would take up. There are no excuses there, it's just a poor finish.

Just now, Andy2461 said:

My god people having a right go at timo. He is being played out of position by frank. You can’t blame him 

He's missed about 3 good chances, one of them being almost impossible to miss than score. 

Just now, Valerie said:

I don't think anybody has said that. On the contrary....

That was all I was hearing back when he was heavily linked to Liverpool. Wasn’t so much us Chelsea fans. 

That could easily have been a penalty. Similar to the one Brighton got one for against Liverpool.

Is Pulisic on the pitch at all? Haven't seen him involved in anything so far.

good Poveda stayed on his feet that wwoukd have been a pen

3 minutes ago, Andy2461 said:

My god people having a right go at timo. He is being played out of position by frank. You can’t blame him 

What’s him being played on the wing got to do with a tap in and a shot from 3 yards out?!

Edited December 5, 20205 yr by DannyLB

Very lucky leeds didn't get a pen a moment ago! If he'd gone down it would've been given. Come on Chelsea, Get a third!

Just now, Sindre said:

That could easily have been a penalty. Similar to the one Brighton got one for against Liverpool.

Shhhh....

I thihk VAR should still look at that and call it a pen, there's no advantage bigger than a pen

Pulsic has offered nothing. Needs some form badly 

Is this commentator high, they played on and had a crack on goal why would VAR intervene.

Just now, JM7 said:

Pulsic has offered nothing. Needs some form badly 

Some decent link up on the wing but not beating his man and every shot is blocked and predictable as that's all he does lately

Pulisic is so f**king greedy, 

Silva is mustard 

1 minute ago, jack h said:

Very lucky leeds didn't get a pen a moment ago! If he'd gone down it would've been given. Come on Chelsea, Get a third!

Commentators are now advocating diving rather that praising his honesty. Just because there’s contact doesn’t make it a foul, didn’t take him out his stride at all.