sh*t first half from us again. Undeservedly winning at half time. But it was a foul on Trevoh in the build up to their goal.

Poor old Fulham, such a positive first half, a disallowed goal. Marco Silva Gutted.

One piece of quality from the Chels. 1-0. Half time. sh*t sandwich for Marco and another beer and a pork pie for me. Tragic.

Come on you Chels !

How the f**k are we so lucky now

Just now, Scott Harris said:

Just saw a replay of their goal being disallowed. I would be furious if that was against us, that was never a foul.

Standing on someone's foot isn't a foul? It was unlucky for sure, but it was a foul.

1 minute ago, Scott Harris said:

Just saw a replay of their goal being disallowed. I would be furious if that was against us, that was never a foul.

It was a foul, this is the kind of decision that I don't want VAR to be used

We’re becoming Artetas Arsenal 🤮

Just now, Malcolm9 said:

Standing on someone's foot isn't a foul? It was unlucky for sure, but it was a foul.

Standing on somebody's foot isn't always a foul. Seemed like a natural collision.

Just now, Sconnie Blue said:

People pretending it was sheer robbery.

It was a stomp and it’s up to the ref/VAR’s interpretation if it was reckless. VAR said it was and clear and obvious.

Mate...come on.

It's not a stomp. He is planting his landing foot like you do in any movement. Chalobah is just unlucky his foot ends up there.

Just now, Malcolm9 said:

Standing on someone's foot isn't a foul? It was unlucky for sure, but it was a foul.

It was accidental and he was just trying to do a spin if that was against us we would be furious and rightly so it was never a foul.

Just now, Scott Harris said:

Just saw a replay of their goal being disallowed. I would be furious if that was against us, that was never a foul.

It's a stamp during a turn. It's the same as you stamping someone's foot when you have the ball

Just now, Malcolm9 said:

Standing on someone's foot isn't a foul? It was unlucky for sure, but it was a foul.

if it hadnt led to a goal, nothing would have been said about it and no one would be making such a big deal

2 minutes ago, Scott Harris said:

Just saw a replay of their goal being disallowed. I would be furious if that was against us, that was never a foul.

That was exactly my take at the time.

In F1 they have things called "Racing Incidents". That was a "Football Incident" at the worst.

1 minute ago, Remodez said:

Mate...come on.

It's not a stomp. He is planting his landing foot like you do in any movement. Chalobah is just unlucky his foot ends up there.

The reason why it's a high skilled move is when you execute it without stamping on someone's foot.

If that wasn't a foul, then you might as well start stamping on defender's foot when you have the ball

5 minutes ago, Malcolm9 said:

It's amazing people saying it wasn't a foul, it clearly was regardless of intention.

Even the pundits are dribbling over it.

The more I search, the more it is a foul. It is absolutely a careless goal. I can understand Fulham feeling hard done by as these are let go time and time again, but it was a foul. When those are given in real time no one thinks twice about it. The issue here is the goal and VAR.

Gonna have a meltdown when Santos comes on for Estevao

I really like Enzo, but this performance is nearly as bad as Palace and he was awful then too.

Got lucky, we look weak all over the pitch, and tactically we are being outplayed. I think it was a foul on Chalobah though, maybe a bit soft, but still a foul.

Hopefully we get over the line, and get some new faces amd Palmer back after the break.

3 minutes ago, Remodez said:

Mate...come on.

It's not a stomp. He is planting his landing foot like you do in any movement. Chalobah is just unlucky his foot ends up there.

It took Trev out the game. Intent or not, it’s a foul.

Am I watching a different game ? Didn’t he stamp on his foot ?

Just now, Remodez said:

Mate...come on.

It's not a stomp. He is planting his landing foot like you do in any movement. Chalobah is just unlucky his foot ends up there.

A stomp is legitimately planting your foot with force. Or are we arguing semantics.

This is a 50/50 decision based on the refs interpretation if it’s deemed reckless enough. This isn’t some daylight robbery.

No changes at HT...

What ever it was or wasnt the decision isnt changing any time soon. Empathy would be best saved for a worthy cause not these juniors from Fulham.

Poor old Fulham 😂

Just now, andy said:

Am I watching a different game ? Didn’t he stamp on his foot ?

He trod on his foot.

No changes lol

Intent is neither here nor there if a player is taken out the game. It’s a foul.

VAR is sh*t still though.

6 minutes ago, El regreso said:

How the f**k are we so lucky now

It all evens out, we have been very unlucky in the past.