Jump to content

Matic

Ethan789blues

By Ethan789blues
in Football (Other Teams)

 Share
Eton Blue at the Chelsea Megastore

Recommended Posts

jack_super_class

jack_super_class

Posted
Posted

From red cafe:

 

"It's bizarre he's going back there after being more or less shafted. In fact it baffles me why any young player would ever want to join Chelsea.

They're career killers unless you cost 20 million pounds. They've constantly buried young talent down the years. f**king vile club, shafted him out whilst overpaying for a clumsy Brazilian and now they're paying stupid amounts to get him back.

Chelsea FC #f**ktards 4ever."

 

Haha, why so serious? 

 

Should ask them if given the chance to sign Pogba back for say £35M would they turn it down? I'm pretty sure his answer would be no.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


splash

splash

Posted
Posted

As in:

--------MvG--------

Rambo------Matic

? Still, it's not done yet so before formations are predicted I suppose we must wait to see if we actually sign the player before we stick him in the starting XI...!

It'd be more like this:

 

            Matic

Rambo          MvG

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CFCflynn

CFCflynn

Posted
Posted

From red cafe:

 

"It's bizarre he's going back there after being more or less shafted. In fact it baffles me why any young player would ever want to join Chelsea.

They're career killers unless you cost 20 million pounds. They've constantly buried young talent down the years. f**king vile club, shafted him out whilst overpaying for a clumsy Brazilian and now they're paying stupid amounts to get him back.

Chelsea FC #f**ktards 4ever."

 

Haha, why so serious? 

mad because we dont settle for players of cleverly and smalling calibre

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Mike 93

Mike 93

Posted
Posted

   Umm, good business selling a promising 22 year old for a 26 year old. Building for the future aren't we?

IMHO, Yes considering the wealth of talent we have in that position. Matic's 25. Whats the problem? 

 

 

Good buisness making over double the amount we paid for a player that has played twice. 

 

Read my previous posts I have always been extremely supportive of De Bruyne. I believed he would be a starter but sadly he hasn't been able to shine albeit not having enough opportunities in my view. 

 

Were desperate for a Matic type player where as right now De Bruyne is a luxury were stocked in that position. Were basically funding Matic with the De Bruyne money. Good Business....

Link to comment
Share on other sites






jack_super_class

jack_super_class

Posted
Posted (edited)

From red cafe:

 

"It's bizarre he's going back there after being more or less shafted. In fact it baffles me why any young player would ever want to join Chelsea.

They're career killers unless you cost 20 million pounds. They've constantly buried young talent down the years. f**king vile club, shafted him out whilst overpaying for a clumsy Brazilian and now they're paying stupid amounts to get him back.

Chelsea FC #f**ktards 4ever."

 

Haha, why so serious? 

 

The same bloke posted this

 

He probably had other options than Chelsea back then, it's not as if Chelsea are known as some sort of unique club for spotting talent.
And it isn't that you " bury phenomenal young talent", it's just your treatment of young players in general.

Who's careers did you stall? I'll go through the list..

Branislav Ivanovic - If it wasn't for Scolari, he'd have been buried and long sold. How long did it take him to make one appearance? this despite the fact Chelsea paid 9 odd million for him.

Daniel Sturridge - Speaks for itself.

Ryan Bertrand - Where is he? Ashley Cole is finished but what do Chelsea do, they play a right full back at left back instead.

Gael Kakuta - Illegally signed from Lens about 500 years ago, spent the last few years being thrown around Europe on loan.

Scott Sinclair - Pissed him about for years.

Tom Taiwo and Michael Woods?

It's not as if these guys were or are in their teens or anything, most are or were in their 20's.

I get that the demand to be successful is the main reason Chelsea never give a chance to young talent but then why spend so much money on these players only to shaft them out on loan every year when they're well into their 20's, it doesn't help them progress. You stop other clubs from getting these players, you stop clubs from developing these players and then you treat them like sh*t and if you can't see that then you're deluded. Take your head out the sand.

I wonder what lies for Josh Mceachran and Nathaniel Chalobah, two very talented players, with Lampard ageing, surely you'd think it would be a perfect opportunity to give either a go, will Chelsea? will they f**k?

It's well known that Chelsea treat young players badly, I'm not even coming up with anything ground breaking here. It's just years of evidence.

Edited by jack_super_class
Link to comment
Share on other sites
coco

coco

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

The same bloke posted this

 

He probably had other options than Chelsea back then, it's not as if Chelsea are known as some sort of unique club for spotting talent.
And it isn't that you " bury phenomenal young talent", it's just your treatment of young players in general.

Who's careers did you stall? I'll go through the list..

Branislav Ivanovic - If it wasn't for Scolari, he'd have been buried and long sold. How long did it take him to make one appearance? this despite the fact Chelsea paid 9 odd million for him.

Daniel Sturridge - Speaks for itself.

Ryan Bertrand - Where is he? Ashley Cole is finished but what do Chelsea do, they play a right full back at left back instead.

Gael Kakuta - Illegally signed from Lens about 500 years ago, spent the last few years being thrown around Europe on loan.

Scott Sinclair - Pissed him about for years.

Tom Taiwo and Michael Woods?

It's not as if these guys were or are in their teens or anything, most are or were in their 20's.

I get that the demand to be successful is the main reason Chelsea never give a chance to young talent but then why spend so much money on these players only to shaft them out on loan every year when they're well into their 20's, it doesn't help them progress. You stop other clubs from getting these players, you stop clubs from developing these players and then you treat them like sh*t and if you can't see that then you're deluded. Take your head out the sand.

I wonder what lies for Josh Mceachran and Nathaniel Chalobah, two very talented players, with Lampard ageing, surely you'd think it would be a perfect opportunity to give either a go, will Chelsea? will they f**k?

It's well known that Chelsea treat young players badly, I'm not even coming up with anything ground breaking here. It's just years of evidence.

 

 

 

Look in the trophy cabinet if you want evidence.

Edited by coco
Link to comment
Share on other sites




ForeverCarefree

ForeverCarefree

Posted
Posted

 

The same bloke posted this

 

He probably had other options than Chelsea back then, it's not as if Chelsea are known as some sort of unique club for spotting talent.
And it isn't that you " bury phenomenal young talent", it's just your treatment of young players in general.

Who's careers did you stall? I'll go through the list..

Branislav Ivanovic - If it wasn't for Scolari, he'd have been buried and long sold. How long did it take him to make one appearance? this despite the fact Chelsea paid 9 odd million for him.

Daniel Sturridge - Speaks for itself.

Ryan Bertrand - Where is he? Ashley Cole is finished but what do Chelsea do, they play a right full back at left back instead.

Gael Kakuta - Illegally signed from Lens about 500 years ago, spent the last few years being thrown around Europe on loan.

Scott Sinclair - Pissed him about for years.

Tom Taiwo and Michael Woods?

It's not as if these guys were or are in their teens or anything, most are or were in their 20's.

I get that the demand to be successful is the main reason Chelsea never give a chance to young talent but then why spend so much money on these players only to shaft them out on loan every year when they're well into their 20's, it doesn't help them progress. You stop other clubs from getting these players, you stop clubs from developing these players and then you treat them like sh*t and if you can't see that then you're deluded. Take your head out the sand.

I wonder what lies for Josh Mceachran and Nathaniel Chalobah, two very talented players, with Lampard ageing, surely you'd think it would be a perfect opportunity to give either a go, will Chelsea? will they f**k?

It's well known that Chelsea treat young players badly, I'm not even coming up with anything ground breaking here. It's just years of evidence.

 

 

There's just so much wrong with this whole post it's laughable, listing our first choice right back Ivanovic as an example of hindering player development? Wah?

 

Not quite sure how we "pissed about" Sinclair "for years" seeing as he left us when he was what 21? The fact that he chose to follow the money to City rather than stay at Swansea is his own fault. 

 

I understand the point the guy is trying to make but considering he supports a club that bought Zaha, one of the most promising English prospects and have let him rot all season and appear reluctant to allow him to leave on loan in order to get first team football, maybe he should look a little closer to home rather than lashing out and talking nonsense about players he clearly knows nothing about. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
jack_super_class

jack_super_class

Posted
Posted

He also lists Ryan Bertrand well i could just name Fabio exactly the same situation.Then he lists two youngsters in Tom Taiwo and Michael Woods both not good enough for Chelsea but thats Chelsea fault.And Kakuta i don't see the problem loaning out a young player,we gave him opportunities whilst out on loan to show he can do but i suppose doing what Utd are doing with Zaha is a better way to handle things.

 

Macheda gets loaned out everywhere because hes not good enough, what about Bebe? Rodrigo Possebon? They signed Zoran Tosic and hardly ever played him.There is bound to be plenty more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up

Well, this is awkward!

Happy Sunny Days GIF by Atlassian

The Shed End Forum relies on revenue to pay for hosting and upgrades. While we try to keep adverts as unobtrusive as possible, we need to show these to make sure we can stay online and continue to keep the forum running. Over the years costs have become very high.

Could you please allow adverts on this domain by switching it off and whitelisting the website? Some of the advert banners can actually be closed to avoid interference with your experience on The Shed End.

If you don't want to view any adverts while logged in and using your account, consider using the Ad-Free Subscription which is renewable every year. To buy a subscription, log in to your account and click the link under the Newbies forum on the home page.

Cheers now!

Sure, let me in!