January 13, 20179 yr On 1/11/2017 at 08:18, ForeverCarefree said: Chances are earned. Other members of the current squad have been able to impress Conte enough to be given chances, Chalobah being one of the best examples. I'm not writing Batshuayi off, there's clearly talent there. But rather then make excuses for him or feel sorry for him I prefer to question what he's (not) doing to limit he's playing time. Conte has been more than willing to give players a chance (see Moses, Chalobah) so why not Batshuayi? Do you think Michy is underperforming in training so badly we can only use him cup games against lesser sides or do you figure Costa has just been undroppable so far? Granted Michy is defo not ready to start every weekend but the latter of those two is where I put my stock. Nobody in the league would get in ahead of Costa if they were at Chelsea. Hard to bench a guy who scores almost every match and gives so much to the side Edited January 13, 20179 yr by TheChelseaBlues
January 13, 20179 yr Must be the first time, ... Yep! That's the first time. It's the fist time we have agreed on the same reaction, dkw. The new year has started well.
January 13, 20179 yr 6 hours ago, TheChelseaBlues said: Do you think Michy is underperforming in training so badly we can only use him cup games against lesser sides or do you figure Costa has just been undroppable so far? Granted Michy is defo not ready to start every weekend but the latter of those two is where I put my stock. Nobody in the league would get in ahead of Costa if they were at Chelsea. Hard to bench a guy who scores almost every match and gives so much to the side Bit of both really. At the start of the season Michy was coming off the bench fairly regularly and getting 10/15 minutes towards the end of games, especially if we were chasing the win. Costa has (in my opinion) been our best player this season (possibly in the whole league) so if he's fit and available he plays. The most telling game though, was Bournemouth at home. Even with Costa suspended Conte chose not to start Michy. If Conte trusted Michy he would have been nailed on to start that game but there's obviously work Conte feels Michy needs to do to improve before he feels he able to call upon him.
January 13, 20179 yr 15 minutes ago, ForeverCarefree said: Bit of both really. At the start of the season Michy was coming off the bench fairly regularly and getting 10/15 minutes towards the end of games, especially if we were chasing the win. Costa has (in my opinion) been our best player this season (possibly in the whole league) so if he's fit and available he plays. The most telling game though, was Bournemouth at home. Even with Costa suspended Conte chose not to start Michy. If Conte trusted Michy he would have been nailed on to start that game but there's obviously work Conte feels Michy needs to do to improve before he feels he able to call upon him. But also tactically, Eddie Howe would have been setting up to play against Michy all week, so to come up against three little blokes not holding up the ball would have been a surprise. So I don't think it is a clear cut as that.
January 13, 20179 yr L'Equipe. This morning. www.lequipe.fr/Football/Article/Paris-tente-michy-batshuayi/768184 Edited January 13, 20179 yr by Krc-fan
January 13, 20179 yr 39 minutes ago, Van Butsen said: But also tactically, Eddie Howe would have been setting up to play against Michy all week, so to come up against three little blokes not holding up the ball would have been a surprise. So I don't think it is a clear cut as that. Eddie Howe will have also considered the possibilty of Batshuayi not starting. We, in a forum did, so surely a professional football coach did as well.
January 13, 20179 yr 1 minute ago, True Blue23 said: Eddie Howe will have also considered the possibilty of Batshuayi not starting. We, in a forum did, so surely a professional football coach did as well. I don't think that's true. Why else would commentators and the like talk about Mourinho's ability to have plan A, B, C sometimes D to such an extent if every other manager does it? He would have had 1 game plan, like the majority lower team managers, to nullify the attack of the opposition and try to get a point. 3-0 later.
January 13, 20179 yr 49 minutes ago, Van Butsen said: But also tactically, Eddie Howe would have been setting up to play against Michy all week, so to come up against three little blokes not holding up the ball would have been a surprise. So I don't think it is a clear cut as that. Not sure I agree with that, I don't think that tactically or personnel wise it would make much difference to Bournemouth whether Michy started or how we set up. From a Chelsea point of view I think it spoke volumes that Conte chose not to select a traditional forward given that the system we had been playing had bought 11 back to back wins up to that point. He preferred to deviate from that rather than pick Michy.
January 13, 20179 yr 2 minutes ago, ForeverCarefree said: Not sure I agree with that, I don't think that tactically or personnel wise it would make much difference to Bournemouth whether Michy started or how we set up. From a Chelsea point of view I think it spoke volumes that Conte chose not to select a traditional forward given that the system we had been playing had bought 11 back to back wins up to that point. He preferred to deviate from that rather than pick Michy. I think the system has been great, but Costa has also been in sublime form. So it's not as if the system would have automatically allowed Michy to play as well. He deviated and it's a possibility he did it to throw the opposition off. Conte has also said in pressers that he needs to develop more, so it's no secret. Tactically it would 100% have a difference though, if you have a traditional centre forward backing into all game, you're going to man him differently to an Eden Hazard.
January 13, 20179 yr Agree with what Van Butsen said, Conte didn't play Bats so it'd mess up Howe's tactical plans, and it worked. Now we're unpredictable whenever Costa is injured, great move by Conte.
January 13, 20179 yr 1 hour ago, Krc-fan said: L'Equipe. This morning. www.lequipe.fr/Football/Article/Paris-tente-michy-batshuayi/768184 Don't speak French. Could you give me a brief overview of what it says?
January 13, 20179 yr 19 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said: Don't speak French. Could you give me a brief overview of what it says? "I surrender"
January 13, 20179 yr 35 minutes ago, RIP Mourinho said: Don't speak French. Could you give me a brief overview of what it says? The bit before the paywall basically says that PSG are looking for a centre-forward to be backup to Cavani, and Kluivert (who is apparently their Director of Football) is looking at Batshuayi, as their first choice Lucas Alario didn't get on with Emery.
January 13, 20179 yr 1 hour ago, dansubrosa said: Agree with what Van Butsen said, Conte didn't play Bats so it'd mess up Howe's tactical plans, and it worked. Now we're unpredictable whenever Costa is injured, great move by Conte. No so great. But effective. No problems at all. Except ...
January 14, 20179 yr Sorry but £33m and he cannot get a game when Costa is out. Either he is not a Conte signing or something has happened behind the scene's. Again we all wonder........ when will it end.
January 15, 20179 yr 11 hours ago, romfordblue said: Sorry but £33m and he cannot get a game when Costa is out. Either he is not a Conte signing or something has happened behind the scene's. Again we all wonder........ when will it end. Or maybe, just maybe, he isn't showing enough in training. I had/have high hopes for him but the Pedro, Hazard and Willian axis has got us two comfortable wins playing some pretty good footy, so hard to complain right now.
January 15, 20179 yr Sorry but £33m and he cannot get a game when Costa is out. Either he is not a Conte signing or something has happened behind the scene's. Again we all wonder........ when will it end. Obviously he is not a Conte signing. And it looks like Conte wants to frustrate him out of the team so Abramovic can give him the financial backing to get his own preferred type of forward. I pray Mitchy has the sort of patience of Moses so he can just get a temporary loan rather than right off his chances and get a permanent move away.
January 15, 20179 yr 13 minutes ago, wallosh said: Obviously he is not a Conte signing. And it looks like Conte wants to frustrate him out of the team so Abramovic can give him the financial backing to get his own preferred type of forward. I pray Mitchy has the sort of patience of Moses so he can just get a temporary loan rather than right off his chances and get a permanent move away. Obviously
January 15, 20179 yr I feel for Bats as he was pretty excited to join us, but Antonio is just not a fan so there isn't a lot he can do really. A loan move to another Premiership team would do him the world of good, at the moment he's like Remy Part II.
January 15, 20179 yr A loan move to another team in january would be terrible. At least here he gets to train with the first team and has the chance to earn some playing time. Getting four months at a new club doesnt give him much time to crack the starting 11, chances are he would sit on the bench and get 5-10 minute cameos
January 15, 20179 yr 35 minutes ago, Xfaxtor said: A loan move to another team in january would be terrible. At least here he gets to train with the first team and has the chance to earn some playing time. Getting four months at a new club doesnt give him much time to crack the starting 11, chances are he would sit on the bench and get 5-10 minute cameos At another club he will most likely start every game. At Chelsea he is lucky to get a few mins.
January 15, 20179 yr 32 minutes ago, Ernie_blue said: At another club he will most likely start every game. At Chelsea he is lucky to get a few mins. Doubtfull
January 15, 20179 yr 2 minutes ago, Xfaxtor said: Doubtfull Yeah like Batman has played plenty of minutes at Chelsea. Lets say Chelsea was going to loan Batman out it would only be to a club he will get a good amount of minutes otherwise it's pointless. So not really doubtful.
January 15, 20179 yr 2 minutes ago, Ernie_blue said: Yeah like Batman has played plenty of minutes at Chelsea. Lets say Chelsea was going to loan Batman out it would only be to a club he will get a good amount of minutes otherwise it's pointless. So not really doubtful. Agree. Its pointless. What club is going to take on one of our players, for four months, and play him over one of their own? Unless its with an option for a second year (which would be even dumber) I cant see it. Anyway, its a moot point. He isnt going out on loan
January 15, 20179 yr I feel Conte is spot on not playing Bats. There is no reason to play 3-4-3 if the striker isn't a certain type. Costa is the right type. Bats would probably do well playing 2 up front or putting the ball in the box early. I feel it might be better if he moved on.
Create an account or sign in to comment