We absolutely need that second goal......1 ahead in this League with these refs is nothing.

3 minutes ago, Slojo said:

And just as I'm talking about, Sky Sports halftime analysis, not one Chelsea pundit but an ex Palace player refusing to comment if it was onside or offside, odd. 

Anyway still 1-0 up pointless moaning, just making a point about the bias on Coverage and the lack of Chelsea pundits, other than that it's a hard decision from the linesman, at first glance Willian looked offside to me, the replay it looked obvious he was on. 

And the other 3 pundits all said it was onside and were smirking at the Palace lad for not saying so.

We need a second if not more. Dangerous being just 1-0 ahead.

The only decent pundit is the new one, the ex-female footballer. Can't remember her name (Alex, I think) , but she speaks more sense than the seasoned pundits. 

Just now, Kentonio said:

And the other 3 pundits all said it was onside and were smirking at the Palace lad for not saying so.

No they weren't, Jamie Redknapp said it was onside, Jermaine Defoe didn't, he only said it was hard for the linesman to see it. 

Even so, so they should... It was clear from the first replay that it was onside, yet the commentators on Sky don't seem to think so for some very odd reason. When Jamie Redknapp is the voice of reason, that's when you know punditry has reached new levels of sh*t. 

Just now, Kentonio said:

And the other 3 pundits all said it was onside and were smirking at the Palace lad for not saying so.

Why do they have current players as pundits? I have never understood this. They aren't going to contribute anything to the analysis, they are just going to be biased in favour of their own team.

Alright then.......lets f**king go Chelsea.

That's the issue with Kante, not so much his passing, it's his decisiveness, he isn't an attacking player, he slowed the player down far too much there and didn't make a move, any other player in our midfield and wingers would've made a move there. 

For the sake of my nerves we need at least another 2/3 goals...

1-1

1 minute ago, Slojo said:

That's the issue with Kante, not so much his passing, it's his decisiveness, he isn't an attacking player, he slowed the player down far too much there and didn't make a move, any other player in our midfield and wingers would've made a move there. 

For me he should not play that position all the time.....in certain games I rather have him where he excels more than any other position.

Draw.

f**k sake, f**k off. 

nightmare - we need to get hazard on

What was that ffs 

OFS !!! Ridiculous. Get Hazard and Kova on.

There it is.......of course we would concede.........how crucial wil that offside goal be ha.

Poor start to the second half and that is what happens. Get Hazard on.

Been poor today. Deserved by Palace. 

That was ridiculously easy for them... 

LUIZ IS A LIABILITY

HAZARD SAVE US !!!

Just now, atomis said:

For me he should not play that position all the time.....in certain games I rather have him where he excels more than any other position.

He needs to sit out where teams sit back & hit you us on the break.

9 minutes ago, TheBluesBrother said:

We need a second if not more. Dangerous being just 1-0 ahead.

Yeah, about that...

Kante, Barkley, Jorginho, Luiz are all having a stinker.

Morata with barely a few touches is one of the best Chelsea players on the pitch.

The lack of creativity in the final third is glaring.