1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Yes there were three people involved in that. It only takes a little while until someone starts arguing, with zero basis whatsoever, that 2 went over 1's back in getting a player. 

Lukaku is just one example as well. Sterling, Aubameyang, Zakaria, Cucurella, Koulibaly, all have looked to be awful. 

@Munkworthare you seeing this?!?

7 hours ago, axman2526 said:

@Munkworthare you seeing this?!?

Disgusting disrespect towards a club legend. 

15 hours ago, ducavis said:

Tuchel could simply have gone “no thanks, I will go with what we have..”, but kept on banging on in the media that he needed a No 9. IMO the blame lies on Tuchel as he had the final say.

He is not wrong though, if that team want to take the next step we need a goalgetter. 

His thinking and pep's thinking  last season was actually very similar. In fact our situation was actually very similar. 

 

 

 

Confirmation bias in action is a wonderful thing....

Some folks think i have gone over the top with my opinion of this c**t, i can honestly  say i hate this arsehole, without doubt the biggest c**t ever to be associated with Chelsea Football Club. f**k him.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12290211/Romelu-Lukaku-WONT-turn-Chelsea-training-tries-help-Inter-cut-34m-price-tag.html

I don't understand how anybody can say that Lukaku type player doesn't not fit possession based football after Haaland, an even more direct st, scored 30+goals and won treble with City. 

28 minutes ago, Bob stark said:

I don't understand how anybody can say that Lukaku type player doesn't not fit possession based football after Haaland, an even more direct st, scored 30+goals and won treble with City. 

A combination of Haaland actually scoring enough goals to make up for what he takes out and Pep adapting his system to that box midfield so they can still control games inspite of Haaland not being too involved in the build up.

1 hour ago, Bob stark said:

I don't understand how anybody can say that Lukaku type player doesn't not fit possession based football after Haaland, an even more direct st, scored 30+goals and won treble with City. 

Excuse me but are you comparing the c**t to Haaland?

1 hour ago, Kev56 said:

Excuse me but are you comparing the c**t to Haaland?

The player profile is very similar 

33 minutes ago, Bob stark said:

The player profile is very similar 

OK profile is one thing, being a complete f**king arsehole w**ker c**t is another. 

8 hours ago, Kev56 said:

Some folks think i have gone over the top with my opinion of this c**t, i can honestly  say i hate this arsehole, without doubt the biggest c**t ever to be associated with Chelsea Football Club. f**k him.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12290211/Romelu-Lukaku-WONT-turn-Chelsea-training-tries-help-Inter-cut-34m-price-tag.html

Good. We don’t want him to come back anyway. He can stay in Milan long enough for us to sack him. 

Karma will catch up with him at one point. Sounds a pretty shallow person the more you read. If he doesn’t come to pre-season, we can stop paying him. 

10 hours ago, Kev56 said:

OK profile is one thing, being a complete f**king arsehole w**ker c**t is another. 

😅😅 Actually this is far more interesting than his football skill-set. 

14 hours ago, Argo said:

A combination of Haaland actually scoring enough goals to make up for what he takes out and Pep adapting his system to that box midfield so they can still control games inspite of Haaland not being too involved in the build up.

Manager adapting to their player 😱😱

12 minutes ago, Bob stark said:

Manager adapting to their player 😱😱

Difference is Haaland shown willingness to meet half way, Lukaku doesn't because he genuinely believes he's too good to do that.

Only way Lukaku would have behaved at Chelsea is if we treated him like and gave him the type of exceptions we gave Hazard and I don't think even his biggest acolyte would say he warrants that (well 2nd biggest as he's obviously his own biggest).

He needs to be sent out to the footballing Siberia to send a message that Chelsea football club will not tolerate this behaviour from any players current and future. If he refuses then Article 17 for club(inter) and player

Edited July 13, 20233 yr by smileysmiles

these c**ts are taking a piss on us

 

 

If Inter submitting bids, they are clearly being encouraged to bid by Chelsea. €30m would mean a huge loss which the club are seemingly prepared to lose. His book value is around £66m isn’t it?

4 minutes ago, JM7 said:

If Inter submitting bids, they are clearly being encouraged to bid by Chelsea. €30m would mean a huge loss which the club are seemingly prepared to lose. His book value is around £66m isn’t it?

Well yeah I imagine we're encouraging them to take that twat off our books but we're probably not encouraging them to take the piss. I really hope we don't cave and accept a sh*tty bid

We should put a bid in for their star player whoever that currently is, lets say £1m and a box of quavers

48 minutes ago, dkw said:

We should put a bid in for their star player whoever that currently is, lets say £1m and a box of quavers

If we are going to play tit for tat, then we need to find a Lukaku equivalent (ie not their star player)

Do Inter have any other buffet hoggers in the squad?

1 hour ago, nonotnowjim said:

If we are going to play tit for tat, then we need to find a Lukaku equivalent (ie not their star player)

Do Inter have any other buffet hoggers in the squad?

 

2 hours ago, dkw said:

We should put a bid in for their star player whoever that currently is, lets say £1m and a box of quavers

Still don’t understand how Inter were demanding €60m for Onana, and now about to sell him to Utd for £40m. Meanwhile we still need a goalie.

1 hour ago, ducavis said:

Still don’t understand how Inter were demanding €60m for Onana, and now about to sell him to Utd for £40m. Meanwhile we still need a goalie.

I guess Chelsea have been adjudged to be the foolish club of transfers. The one where you get their players for less than their worth but ensure to fleece them for every single penny you can when selling to them. 

Very terrible reputation to have gained but we need to end it sharpish. I know why people say better we get the expensive player off our books than have an unhappy player polluting the rest of the squad, but sometimes you need to take short term pain for a long term benefit. 

Make an example of the loaf and other players and clubs will take note. Send him to the reserve team as punishment for not returning to the club when due as contractual breach. 

Half a season without games and his career at his age is all but buried. 

Half a season of not doing much ...can you imagine his size , maybe challenge Tyson Fury