So after all the noise this is their offer? Lol get f**ked Fulham. 
 

 

11 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

So after all the noise this is their offer? Lol get f**ked Fulham. 
 

 

No doubt they've been reading about him being just a lower league journeyman by fans of the club he actually plays for.

We're lucky to not be offered a few footballs and a couple of goal nets

 

37 minutes ago, The Rising Sun said:

No doubt they've been reading about him being just a lower league journeyman by fans of the club he actually plays for.

We're lucky to not be offered a few footballs and a couple of goal nets

Think we'd be better off with the few footballs and couple of nets. 

On 28/01/2024 at 18:29, jack_super_class said:

I dont think they are selling him because they dont rate his potential its because hes pure profit and they probably know they are getting Osimehn in the summer.

With Jackson looking better atm he can be the backup so Broja isnt needed.

" With Jackson looking better, .........so Broja isn't needed " 

I obviously haven't been paying attention

😂

 

 

1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:

 

Be still HazardousChoice beating heart.

1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:

So after all the noise this is their offer? Lol get f**ked Fulham. 
 

 

Unlike Maatsen and Gallagher Broja has several years left on his deal, so we can afford to have patience.

32 minutes ago, olderschoolcfc said:

 

Think we'd be better off with the few footballs and couple of nets. 

Fulham wouldn't need the nets if they sign Broja.

Motherf**ker. Give it a bloody rest. Do you ever do anything on here except bash Broja? It's so tiresome.

3 hours ago, The Rising Sun said:

" With Jackson looking better, .........so Broja isn't needed " 

I obviously haven't been paying attention

😂

 

Jackson been better than Broja, dont see how thats even a debate.

3 hours ago, Zeta said:

Motherf**ker. Give it a bloody rest. Do you ever do anything on here except bash Broja? It's so tiresome.

That "league 2 journeyman" is so bad he managed to get us to get spanked by Liverpool just by being on the bench! Now that's some black magic right there!

5 hours ago, Gonoir Beniashile said:

 

Love that positive thinking. I always wondered what @Whats_The_Mata? looked like. Surprised me. He's slimmer than I thought and doesn't have thick glasses and a comb-over. 

 

 

I'm all for letting Broja go IF we have a replacement lined up. Otherwise are we really going to spend the season with Jackson as our only recognised striker? What happens if Jackson gets a long term injury, Palmer false-9 or Nkunku up front for the rest of the season? Or maybe Dujuan Richards who is yet to ever play competitive professional football? David Washington who hasn't had more than 10 minutes all season to lead the line maybe? 

3 minutes ago, Erik said:

I'm all for letting Broja go IF we have a replacement lined up. Otherwise are we really going to spend the season with Jackson as our only recognised striker? What happens if Jackson gets a long term injury, Palmer false-9 or Nkunku up front for the rest of the season? Or maybe Dujuan Richards who is yet to ever play competitive professional football? David Washington who hasn't had more than 10 minutes all season to lead the line maybe? 

Richards is the answer. Kid is so good even HazardousChoice won't give him sh*t. Just you wait and see!

Pretty sure Broja will be departing tomorrow, either on loan or permanently. The fact that he didn't even get on as sub tonight suggest that we are preparing the paperwork.

36 minutes ago, forbzy said:

Pretty sure Broja will be departing tomorrow, either on loan or permanently. The fact that he didn't even get on as sub tonight suggest that we are preparing the paperwork.

Yeah I found it strange he was there at all. Clearly the likelihood is he is leaving otherwise Poch would have subbed him on as he has done when he is on the bench.

So if you are not going to use him why bother taking him there?

Sounds like Fulham are front runners.

Loan fee, buy option of about 25mill, full wages covered. 

3 hours ago, axman2526 said:

Yeah I found it strange he was there at all. Clearly the likelihood is he is leaving otherwise Poch would have subbed him on as he has done when he is on the bench.

So if you are not going to use him why bother taking him there?

Sounds like Fulham are front runners.

Loan fee, buy option of about 25mill, full wages covered. 

Thought this was weird too. Maybe as emergency back up if we had a early injury that would have been too soon for Nkunku to come on. Bit of a reach though.

Jimenez injury surely gets this pushed through today. They’d be crazy to go into the second half of the season with 1 fit natural striker 👀

13 hours ago, axman2526 said:

That "league 2 journeyman" is so bad he managed to get us to get spanked by Liverpool just by being on the bench! Now that's some black magic right there!

Our defenders are struggling making the adjustment of marking a statue like Broja all week in training and then going into games against players that move

Journo's now reporting we've got serious and offered him to Fulham, Wolves and West Ham for £5m on loan and no obligation but no interest.

For a player of Broja's calibre.  You'd expect that to be the transfer fee not a loan fee.

I suspect we will end up loaning him out on the hope that he has a good loan and they can get something for him in the summer.

If we don't have a replacement coming in and it looks like we don't.

There is no way we should be letting him go. Absolute madness from us if we green light this and I can't understand the manager agreeing to it if he has.

30 minutes ago, Sheva said:

If we don't have a replacement coming in and it looks like we don't.

There is no way we should be letting him go. Absolute madness from us if we green light this and I can't understand the manager agreeing to it if he has.

Maybe they want to cut their losses and go with a number 10 playing as a false 9 rather than having an actual number 9 playing as a false 9

12 minutes ago, WhiteWall said:

Maybe they want to cut their losses and go with a number 10 playing as a false 9 rather than having an actual number 9 playing as a false 9

That always goes really well....

25 minutes ago, dkw said:

That always goes really well....

Sure did yesterday.

44 minutes ago, WhiteWall said:

Maybe they want to cut their losses and go with a number 10 playing as a false 9 rather than having an actual number 9 playing as a false 9

Have we actually lost a game that Broja has started? He's not been banging them in but having an actual striking presence on the field does impact the game and open up channels. 

Edited February 1, 20242 yr by Erik

6 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

Sure did yesterday.

First leg against Boro worked a treat. We only won 6-1 in the follow-up after ditching it.