It's still not too late to send him on loan is it? I still think a loan to Dortmund would be a good move for everyone involved. 

46 minutes ago, Victor90 said:

It's still not too late to send him on loan is it? I still think a loan to Dortmund would be a good move for everyone involved. 

Except Dortmund, but 2 out of 3 ain't bad 

Just accept this was a very expensive mistake.

He's simply not good enough and with the players we have now he shouldn't be getting anywhere near the team.

Couldn’t we swap him with Chiesa ?? Win win for both 

23 minutes ago, El regreso said:

Couldn’t we swap him with Chiesa ?? Win win for both 

Look up Chiesa's injury history. Legs of glass. Missed roughly 80 games over the last couple of seasons.

30 minutes ago, El regreso said:

Couldn’t we swap him with Chiesa ?? Win win for both 

Just leave him in the squad for a year. 

Neto Felix Palmer nkunku madueke, that's 5 players into 3 roles already. Mudryk is fine as the 6th. 

@Mod can we move the Mudryk thread to the ex-players section?

 It might make something happen. Bit of wishful thinking never hurt anyone did it?

26 minutes ago, just said:

@Mod can we move the Mudryk thread to the ex-players section?

 It might make something happen. Bit of wishful thinking never hurt anyone did it?

Disgusting! Malta Blue will be after you next time!

3 minutes ago, Mod said:

Disgusting! Malta Blue will be after you next time!

It's alright. I'd get over it. I'm a long way from Malta.

18 hours ago, dermott said:

Look up Chiesa's injury history. Legs of glass. Missed roughly 80 games over the last couple of seasons.

So a massive upgrade on Mudryk then. But the only criteria to be an upgrade on Mudryk is to have a pulse.

We really should find a way to move him out. A sale/loan to a side in Holland or Belgium might give him an opportunity to recover his career as a footballer. You never know, but he could do a Salah (yeah, a big stretch I know) if he gets a year or two at a lower level and under the radar.

On 27/08/2024 at 12:48, dermott said:

Look up Chiesa's injury history. Legs of glass. Missed roughly 80 games over the last couple of seasons.

 

4 minutes ago, El regreso said:

 

Good luck to them and him. Fit, he's a good player. I suppose at £10m + add ons they think it's worth the risk. Less than Juve were originally asking.

Edited August 28, 20241 yr by dermott

29 minutes ago, dermott said:

Good luck to them and him. Fit, he's a good player. I suppose at £10m + add ons they think it's worth the risk. Less than Juve were originally asking.

Misha fit isn’t better than Chiesa half fit. Even if you only get him for 10 games he’s superior to Misha.
At £10+ £2.5 it’s more than worth the risk in my opinion that is.

 

Hopefully he matches the standard of his Italian predecessors at Liverpool. 

2 hours ago, El regreso said:

Misha fit isn’t better than Chiesa half fit. Even if you only get him for 10 games he’s superior to Misha.
At £10+ £2.5 it’s more than worth the risk in my opinion that is.

 

What does Chiesa offer that our 6 other wingers don't? 7 if you want to still include Sterling. 

Poor again so far, he's never in the game. 

Edited August 29, 20241 yr by Dr Gonzo

No way he's a better option than Sterling and Maresca's type of winger which Raheem is not per Maresca. This is why we wont get much success under these mug owners. 

Apparently Egbahli and the Sporting Directors were at the game tonight. Hopefully they will be working to get Mudryk sent out on loan after that.

He's genuinely one of the worst players I've ever seen play for us at that price. The guys appalling. 

That cameo at Liverpool had me buzzing but he's got nothing bar pace that a Sunday league player has. 

He has to go. Hes not going to get a look in with neto and felix available to play there. Id been of the opinion he might come good eventually but enough is enough, hes ran out of lives imo.

Him and Dewsbury-Hall down the left hand side was like watching the Chuckle Brothers .

Was in last chance saloon tonight and blew it 

1 hour ago, Zeta said:

Him and Dewsbury-Hall down the left hand side was like watching the Chuckle Brothers .

To me, to you. To me, to you.

Edited August 29, 20241 yr by just

4 hours ago, General said:

No way he's a better option than Sterling and Maresca's type of winger which Raheem is not per Maresca. This is why we wont get much success under these mug owners. 

Apart from the money side of it ( until we get Sterling off our book), Sterling is a better option than Mudryk for now, and the foreseeable future. I just don't think we could call Mudryk a player with great potential, at his age his game should be a lot more accomplished. He's a good athlete, that's about it, I'm afraid.

A loan with an exit strategy is the best way for all parties, although there will be some read faces if we get rid off Mudryk and tell Sterling he still has a future at the club.

9 hours ago, forbzy said:

Apparently Egbahli and the Sporting Directors were at the game tonight. Hopefully they will be working to get Mudryk sent out on loan after that.

If remove strasbrough, who will take Mudryk? 

You want a team who will play Mudyrk all the time. It is hard to see any PL team doing this, a lower Italian or German team will probably take him but Chelsea has to subsidize 90% of his salary.