September 2, 20232 yr Just now, Argo said: First season he ever played for us he didn't score once in the entire campaign. True but at the time we had other players who could score a decent number of goals. Not sure where the goals come from right now.
September 2, 20232 yr Got to laugh at Jackson. It's like someone is paying us to look as bad as possible and miss open goals.
September 2, 20232 yr If Jackson can't score that how is he going to become the goal scorer we need? No composure in front of the goal.
September 2, 20232 yr Honestly, in all the games I've seen him play, Jackson has looked sh*t. I missed Luton last week.
September 2, 20232 yr If we actually played a 433 I'm convinced we would fare much better. We should've learnt against West Ham. I have no words.
September 2, 20232 yr Just now, bluedave said: Honestly, in all the games I've seen him play, Jackson has looked sh*t. I missed Luton last week. No way you are joking. Jackson looked fantastic until today
September 2, 20232 yr Not scoring today then.. we bring it on ourselves though .. poor team selection.. chilwell is hopeless Ina forward position and Connor is not a 6..
September 2, 20232 yr Just now, nonotnowjim said: Exactly. We paid for potential. It is a huge gamble that could pay off in a couple of years, and see is dominate for a long time, or it could also easily end up destroying the club if most of them fail. Time will tell. 5 games into the season is not the time for our "fans" to write us off. It's an absurd risk to take from the owners. There is zero chance of being dominant, not in this league, not with City around. There is a high risk of destroying the club though. If a chance of destroying the club was even a chance, then it's not a risk worth taking.
Create an account or sign in to comment