January 19, 20188 yr 8 minutes ago, DarkMata said: It might save us from making some terrible mistakes A transfer ban would almost insure that Conte and Hazard would be gone by the end of the year...
January 19, 20188 yr 2 minutes ago, TheChelsRVA said: A transfer ban would almost insure that Conte and Hazard would be gone by the end of the year... Wrong. We would not be selling Hazard if we couldn’t bring anyone in. Atletico and Griezmann is a prime example.
January 19, 20188 yr 39 minutes ago, mwblue10 said: Wrong. We would not be selling Hazard if we couldn’t bring anyone in. Atletico and Griezmann is a prime example. I am confident hazard would ask for a move if we aren't reinforcing our squad. Hazard is in that prime contract place where he can begin to make demands about his future, otherwise we risk losing out to him on a free a year after our ban would be up. Also, Hazard is a better player than Griezmann so he holds more weight. Real will be in rebuilding this summer...they will let a lot of older players go (maybe even Ronaldo). They are sure to be on a spending spree and if they come to us with a 200m offer for Hazard, it will be hard to turn that down even if we are banned. It may be a one time deal offer. Hopefully it's nonsense and we don't have to worry about it
January 19, 20188 yr Is this a f**king joke? What has gone wrong at this club? First Andy Carroll now Peter f**king Crouch while our rivals are going after the likes of Sanchez. It's almost like winning the league has become a curse for us in some ways. One step forward, 5 giant steps backwards ffs! Does Marina expect that Conte (or whatever manager she has in mind when she forces Conte out with horrific transfers) will continue to work magic with the absolutely bang average players she brings in while our rivals go for top quality? Does she expect him to continue to turn dust into gold? Or is this Conte sh*tting the bed asking for absolute dross to be brought in? Quite frankly, I'm not sure what situation is worse. Should have stayed away from football news like I've done over the past 2-3 months and stuck to matchdays alone. It was better for my sanity. What a bloody mess! Edited January 19, 20188 yr by Barrettinator
January 19, 20188 yr The funny thing is, despite how poorly Bats fits into our system, he is still better than Carrol and Crouch. So replacing him with one of them is completely illogical. So for that reason, I'm going to assume it's BS.
January 19, 20188 yr double post but Stoke chairman to the rescue! http://www.stokesentinel.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/stoke-city-chelsea-crouch-coates-1089622
January 19, 20188 yr TBF I coud see him fitting in. Good target man like Conte wants, good feet, obviously great at heading... On a 6 month loan to play in the easy-win games and off the bench in emergencies why not?
January 19, 20188 yr For a big fella he's got great feet. But at his age, those feet should be resting on the end of a sun lounger, not running out at Stamford Bridge. Edited January 19, 20188 yr by Famous CFC
January 19, 20188 yr still not buying it. Same sh*t reported as last night which Stoke chairman rubbished
January 19, 20188 yr 47 minutes ago, Fatty_Speeding said: TBF I coud see him fitting in. Good target man like Conte wants, good feet, obviously great at heading... On a 6 month loan to play in the easy-win games and off the bench in emergencies why not? Is this a joke ?
January 19, 20188 yr 1 hour ago, Fatty_Speeding said: TBF I coud see him fitting in. Good target man like Conte wants, good feet, obviously great at heading... On a 6 month loan to play in the easy-win games and off the bench in emergencies why not? Funnily enough i would have actually loved him here in the 00's, but now it's just a step too far.
January 19, 20188 yr 1 hour ago, Fatty_Speeding said: TBF I coud see him fitting in. Good target man like Conte wants, good feet, obviously great at heading... On a 6 month loan to play in the easy-win games and off the bench in emergencies why not? Cringe
Create an account or sign in to comment