15 minutes ago, timetowaste said:

it’s happening 

Breaking images from Matt Law and JM7

11 minutes ago, dansubrosa said:

Thanks for everything Roman.

 

Best owner ever.

He certainly is Dave, he certainly is. Best owner ever, never will he be bettered.

31 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

Hey @Munkworth we need one of your "this is a .... thread " pictures.

I only have the one, could we class this as a predictions thread as people are trying to predict the new owners? 

Just now, Munkworth said:

I only have the one, could we class this as a predictions thread as people are trying to predict the new owners? 

Or I guess @Zeta could you please post "this is a future of our club thread" for Munk to make a new picture?

Everyone shut the f**k up.

How is that?

I am really scared right now I'm not going to lie.

19 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

Breaking images from Matt Law and JM7

He certainly is Dave, he certainly is. Best owner ever, never will he be bettered.

24 hours left boys and girls!!!!!

13 minutes ago, Zeta said:

Everyone shut the f**k up.

🤔

Well I am grateful it was not axman2526 shut the f**k up as Munk would never, ever stop sending that at me...

Finish line tomorrow, Boehly is in

2 hours ago, Mana said:

 

Boy you guys cannot read. You need to go to school.

“I was itching to put Jorginho in this list as well, but he is more of a disappointing signing than a complete dud like Alonso.”

 

Aka, Jorginho and Alonso are more of disappointing signings than complete duds. 

Even IF you think I said Alonso is a complete dud, I would have lumped him with Bakayoko on that list! Use your noggings idiots!

Do you realise that you are giving the impression of a spoilt brat?

Just now, moi said:

Do you realise that you are giving the impression of a spoilt brat?

So when people call me names, that's a-ok but when I do it I'm a spoilt brat. 🤪

Your post doesn't add anything to the conversation and if you want to continue this, go to the Jorginho thread.

3 minutes ago, Mana said:

So when people call me names, that's a-ok but when I do it I'm a spoilt brat. 🤪

Your post doesn't add anything to the conversation and if you want to continue this, go to the Jorginho thread.

That told you Moi🤣

5 minutes ago, Ballack & Blu said:

That told you Moi🤣

Indeed it did, Ballack and Blu Moi's post not adding anything to a conversation?  To be honest, I didn't for one minute think a conversation was taking place Sorry I have been away so long. I have been looking after a Ukrainian family over here.

31 minutes ago, moi said:

Indeed it did, Ballack and Blu Moi's post not adding anything to a conversation?  To be honest, I didn't for one minute think a conversation was taking place Sorry I have been away so long. I have been looking after a Ukrainian family over here.

 No need to explain, just a strange convo with OP

So, where are we with all this?

Today is the day it get's signed, or something pops up last minute?

This process has been a rollercoaster for the fans.

Hopefully today provides some much needed certainty for the club.

8 hours ago, Zeta said:

How is that?

 

 

8 hours ago, axman2526 said:

🤔

Well I am grateful it was not axman2526 shut the f**k up as Munk would never, ever stop sending that at me...

It can be arranged…

I know that it's likely not going to affect how the government acts in relation to Chelsea, but the way they've lost yesterday's council elections may shake up a bit the Tory government and hopefully affects in a positive way the sale of Chelsea.

Blues farce shows this government cannot be trusted 

Less than a year ago, Chelsea were the champions of Europe. It needed superhuman mismanagement to steer them to the brink of extinction within a matter of weeks, but this Government has delivered it.

Having assumed stewardship in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, their foolish deadlines and absence of acumen risk taking the most successful club of the last decade - two league titles, two Champions Leagues, two Europa Leagues, two FA Cups, a League Cup, FIFA Club World Cup and UEFA Super Cup - out of existence.

Impressive. Takes some doing. Even Bury weren't wiped off the face of the earth. And this is Chelsea. Their name alone is a licence to print money. 

Yet, having failed to come up with so much as a means of selling match tickets to fill Stamford Bridge, the Government are now talking as if the future of the club is in genuine doubt: 117 years of history, gone.

Still, to make their poor case for regulation, the same politicians will pontificate about clubs like Bury who unsurprisingly struggled in an area of the country that houses Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool and Everton. 

Yet if they can't manage Chelsea, how could their regulatory appointees be trusted with the running of clubs down the pyramid, where skilled financial management is key?

Nigel Huddleston, the sports minister, encapsulates the intellectual shortcomings. Remember last week when he talked about seizing £1billion from Premier League clubs, if they couldn't reach agreement on providing extra funds for the EFL?

Think about that negotiation now. Having told the EFL they will be gifted £1bn if no deal is struck, what motivation is there for Rick Parry to reach an agreement? It would be like a divorcing couple haggling over the house. The judge steps in and says that, unless they come to a settlement, he's going to give it to the wife.

That's the end of the negotiation, isn't it? Why would she seek a parlayed outcome now? Do nothing and she's getting the house. She has a vested interest in there being no resolution. So do the EFL, thanks to Huddleston.

This is an example of the ministerial brains that have been brought to bear on Chelsea. No wonder they're in trouble. 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-10786551/MARTIN-SAMUEL-Lifting-Manchester-City-floor-Pep-Guardiolas-biggest-career-test.html

At last somebody in the media is waking up to the farce of what has happened to our club and stopped the tribal click-baiting. The time is probably right for us as fans to protest too.

Edited May 6, 20224 yr by charierre

7 hours ago, Jezz said:

This process has been a rollercoaster for the fans.

Hopefully today provides some much needed certainty for the club.

If only!

Seems we're doomed to this kind of endless drama.

1 hour ago, charierre said:

Blues farce shows this government cannot be trusted 

Less than a year ago, Chelsea were the champions of Europe. It needed superhuman mismanagement to steer them to the brink of extinction within a matter of weeks, but this Government has delivered it.

Having assumed stewardship in the aftermath of Russia's invasion of Ukraine, their foolish deadlines and absence of acumen risk taking the most successful club of the last decade - two league titles, two Champions Leagues, two Europa Leagues, two FA Cups, a League Cup, FIFA Club World Cup and UEFA Super Cup - out of existence.

Impressive. Takes some doing. Even Bury weren't wiped off the face of the earth. And this is Chelsea. Their name alone is a licence to print money. 

Yet, having failed to come up with so much as a means of selling match tickets to fill Stamford Bridge, the Government are now talking as if the future of the club is in genuine doubt: 117 years of history, gone.

Still, to make their poor case for regulation, the same politicians will pontificate about clubs like Bury who unsurprisingly struggled in an area of the country that houses Manchester United, Manchester City, Liverpool and Everton. 

Yet if they can't manage Chelsea, how could their regulatory appointees be trusted with the running of clubs down the pyramid, where skilled financial management is key?

Nigel Huddleston, the sports minister, encapsulates the intellectual shortcomings. Remember last week when he talked about seizing £1billion from Premier League clubs, if they couldn't reach agreement on providing extra funds for the EFL?

Think about that negotiation now. Having told the EFL they will be gifted £1bn if no deal is struck, what motivation is there for Rick Parry to reach an agreement? It would be like a divorcing couple haggling over the house. The judge steps in and says that, unless they come to a settlement, he's going to give it to the wife.

That's the end of the negotiation, isn't it? Why would she seek a parlayed outcome now? Do nothing and she's getting the house. She has a vested interest in there being no resolution. So do the EFL, thanks to Huddleston.

This is an example of the ministerial brains that have been brought to bear on Chelsea. No wonder they're in trouble. 

 

At last somebody in the media is waking up to the farce of what has happened to our club and stopped the tribal click-baiting. The time is probably right for us as fans to protest too.

Don't link to that shower of sh*t please, they are proven to lie and lie over and over, do not trust the DM.

 

8 minutes ago, timetowaste said:

 

it is good or bad?

can some one explain?

8 minutes ago, Mário César said:

it is good or bad?

can some one explain?

If it’s true it’s good news, it stops the owners from taking vast amounts of money out of the club like the Glazers do at Man Utd