Concerning thing for Frank for the HT talk was that everyone was awful that half. 

2 minutes ago, jack h said:

Ok then, Ederson as well, not that he matters with how sh*t our players are playing. Cancelo is better than Walker and Jesus has never been consistantly in their team. The fact you are ignoring is that their team out there is better than ours. The "city have X players out with covid" is a bullsh*t narrative.

I wouldn’t say they are better than us they are just up for it more . I don’t think this team is as horrible as people making it out to seem

6 minutes ago, bisright1 said:

I think Lampard gets the season for me. We aren't going to get relegated and we aren't going to qualify for the champions league. Changing the manager won't affect that. No one can convince me otherwise. 

And why wouldn’t we make the champions league??? We’re supposed to be title challengers (even if with a low probability of winning it). We made the champions league last year with all that went against us. 
 

Absolute nonsense to stay with a manager that’s not producing, despite the investment put in the squad this year. 

2 minutes ago, evissy said:

It is easier to be trashed by a good side rather than some mediocre team. 

What like Arsenal

Midfield is the least creative for while at Chelsea, we might as well change formation, we haven’t got one creative midfielder on the pitch in this set up.

 

Just now, bisright1 said:

What is ended well? I don't think we get champs league with a caretaker. 

The board will be able to show any incoming manager, we will give you the players. We will give you the time. 

I'd rather we finish 14th at the end of the year and lampard is sacked, than we sack him tomorrow and a caretaker gets us to 6th. Genuinely. 

 

 

Why? That makes no sense. Either way we would get rid of Lampard in both scenario's and a new manager comes in anyway. So basically, you prefer us finishing 14th than 6th? 

2 minutes ago, CFCCAN said:

A f**king reaction!!!  This is exactly what I've said all along, he's does nothing tactically to change the game whether it be formation or taking players off; at 2-0 he should have done something to stop the bleeding and he's done nothing except watch City exploit the midfield and defence time and time again...they should be at least 5 up if the truth be known. 

Some people will make any and every excuse for Lampard and I understand I loved him as a player too but this just isn’t working. Should’ve let him get some more time managing elsewhere before coming back to the bridge. 

There has to be a halftime sub doesnt there?

Chelsea to win this 4-3 is that too much to ask or I need to take my meds?

1 minute ago, Nibs said:

No subs at HT? What are you waiting for Frank?

 

60th minute for the first sub, then 70th minute for the next 2 as per usual

Can Frank expect a change if he makes no changes? Trusts the wording? 

2 minutes ago, enigma said:

Who do we even bring in if Lampard goes? There is nobody of top quality to bring in. I believe it's also a mentality problem with the players. Lampard needs to realise that those players can't all be as good as he was. His mentality is not the mentality that is shared with a lot of the players he coaches unfortunately. 

I would let him see out the season, and then assess the market.  I wouldn’t give him a penny to spend in the market though, since he can’t get Havertz & Werner firing. 
 

I don’t think we will get relegated.

Lampard just sitting like a statue. No changes, no ideas what to do? 

We started so brightly as well then one goal conceded and we totally collapse. Really really depressing to see. Even when other teams have other players inured we are the gift that keeps on gifting.

4 minutes ago, JM7 said:

I can’t see Roman sacking Lampard - not unless the players revolt AVB style. I don’t think that will happen. I think Frank willl get the season but only because it’s him. Anyone else would have been sacked. 

Not convinced about that. I can easily see Frank being gone before the end of January if things carry on like this. His club history won't buy him time. There is something badly wrong in the club. The mentality of the players just isn't one of a desire to win football games. This is one of the most embarrassing first half performances from any top flight side let alone one that has spent hundreds of millions. 

1 minute ago, Slojo said:

Why? That makes no sense. Either way we would get rid of Lampard in both scenario's and a new manager comes in anyway. So basically, you prefer us finishing 14th than 6th? 

For the benefit of only one person. 

That is the madness we are dealing with. 

Can't imagine too many points on the predictor tonight

9 minutes ago, Slojo said:

Probably the worst take so far, our form is because of Pulisic? Be quiet you melon. 

So it’s not because of him then ? You keeP drinking the koolaide you mug 

2 minutes ago, enigma said:

Poch is at PSG. Rafa would not be a good option. 

Our fans hate him, silver lining is the pandemic. 

I know it’s harsh to point fingers at individual players for this performance but Kante has been a serious letdown. 

No changes ?

More of the same then

No changes. 0-6 City again?

Just now, enigma said:

Poch is at PSG. Rafa would not be a good option. 

Wonder where Potch went

not a single change ? Are you for real ffs 

Asspi is so crap, need James back ASAP