August 27, 20232 yr 1 hour ago, Scott Harris said: It's truly incredible that our rivals are happy to bail us out time and time again. We just need Tottenham to come in for Lukaku now. Because of the media narrative that any issues at Chelsea are always deep rooted club problems and the players/managers are innocent bystanders, it's been going on ever since Spurs fell for it with AVB, you'd think they'd all learn by now.
August 27, 20232 yr If United are to loan him we should make it so: 1. They cover 100% of their wages. 2. They pay a sizeable loan fee, say 7mill pounds. 3. There is an option, that turns in to an obligation, to buy built in so if certain conditions they have to buy him for say 33mill.
August 27, 20232 yr So Maatsan will be cover for Chilwell with this plan? Makes sense, although I think the quality of our squad is a little lean now.
August 28, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, PhilH930 said: So Maatsan will be cover for Chilwell with this plan? Makes sense, although I think the quality of our squad is a little lean now. Colwill or Badashille can also cover at LB if needed. Man U are interested in Marcus Alonso now apparently.
August 28, 20232 yr 3 hours ago, PhilH930 said: So Maatsan will be cover for Chilwell with this plan? Makes sense, although I think the quality of our squad is a little lean now. In no way does Cucurella contributes to the quality of our squad
August 28, 20232 yr 50 minutes ago, SydneyChelsea said: In no way does Cucurella contributes to the quality of our squad Agreed. United are desperate here though and we need to make dealbthat suits us. Like we did with Lewis Hall. We helped Newcastle out but still get the fee we want next summer. If we agree a loan with obligation to buy then that is fine. If he goes there just for wages only we will have done a poor deal imo.
August 28, 20232 yr 3 hours ago, axman2526 said: Agreed. United are desperate here though and we need to make dealbthat suits us. Like we did with Lewis Hall. We helped Newcastle out but still get the fee we want next summer. If we agree a loan with obligation to buy then that is fine. If he goes there just for wages only we will have done a poor deal imo. They won't be interested in anything else. They just want a stop gap and are shopping around wildly. We will have to either take it or leave it I suspect. Can see them get Reguilon. Cheapest and simplest loaner by the look of it.
August 28, 20232 yr Maybe it's a little unfair to judge Cucurella after a poor season last season. Sterling was not good last season either, but seems to have revived himself. If we let Cucurella leave then we don't have LB back up. Chilwell will likely not stay fit all season, so not sure what we should do tbh. Can we rely on Maatsen?
August 28, 20232 yr 40 minutes ago, enigma said: Maybe it's a little unfair to judge Cucurella after a poor season last season. Sterling was not good last season either, but seems to have revived himself. If we let Cucurella leave then we don't have LB back up. Chilwell will likely not stay fit all season, so not sure what we should do tbh. Can we rely on Maatsen? Maatsen is ahead of Cucurella as a LB option anyway. Arguably Colwill and Biadiashile too.
August 28, 20232 yr 56 minutes ago, enigma said: Maybe it's a little unfair to judge Cucurella after a poor season last season. Sterling was not good last season either, but seems to have revived himself. If we let Cucurella leave then we don't have LB back up. Chilwell will likely not stay fit all season, so not sure what we should do tbh. Can we rely on Maatsen? Maatsen can cover for other areas as well. Cucurella can't even do the job he should be doing. He just can't defend. With Marcos Alonso that was okay as he scored goals. I don't see Cucu doing a job for us.
August 28, 20232 yr 44 minutes ago, Gonoir Beniashile said: I just wish he'd get that stupid f**king mop cut Why though? What makes it stupid? He certainly doesn't see it that way and I wonder why it should cause you such angst
August 28, 20232 yr 11 minutes ago, abister1 said: Why though? What makes it stupid? He certainly doesn't see it that way and I wonder why it should cause you such angst You can see from Gonoir's profile pic that he'll be bald in a couple of years.
August 28, 20232 yr 30 minutes ago, abister1 said: Why though? What makes it stupid? He certainly doesn't see it that way and I wonder why it should cause you such angst Par for the course around here. Getting knickers in a twist over the silliest, petty things.
August 28, 20232 yr 2 hours ago, dermott said: Par for the course around here. Getting knickers in a twist over the silliest, petty things. I do agree with @Gonoir Beniashile though. It only invites opponents to pull his hair and do they get booked? Nooooo they don't. Did Mount take his hairdresser with him? He might have some wonderful suggestions about highlights to make it special.
August 28, 20232 yr 4 hours ago, RIP Mourinho said: Maatsen is ahead of Cucurella as a LB option anyway. Arguably Colwill and Biadiashile too. I’m not sure - Maatsen didn’t play there once during pre season. Imo maatsen should be chilwells back up, and cucu can be used if we play back 4 and chilwell is out. Need maatsen to sign a new contract don’t we before we let cucu go either way?
August 28, 20232 yr 5 hours ago, dermott said: Par for the course around here. Getting knickers in a twist over the silliest, petty things. Interpreting everything people write on here with a literal translation is also a bit silly IMO. Some people get the humour, some people get the hump.
August 29, 20232 yr 14 hours ago, just said: Interpreting everything people write on here with a literal translation is also a bit silly IMO. Some people get the humour, some people get the hump. Ah of course, that's us that don't know what the rules of engagement regards how to use words to garner reactions told then. Everything you post is just downright tripe and I'd wish you'd stop your f**king annoying posts. I can be a quick learner sometimes. Pick your camp, humour or hump.
August 29, 20232 yr 15 hours ago, just said: Interpreting everything people write on here with a literal translation is also a bit silly IMO. Some people get the humour, some people get the hump. If any of it were amusing I'd agree.
August 29, 20232 yr 4 hours ago, abister1 said: Ah of course, that's us that don't know what the rules of engagement regards how to use words to garner reactions told then. Everything you post is just downright tripe and I'd wish you'd stop your f**king annoying posts. I can be a quick learner sometimes. Pick your camp, humour or hump. Marc Cucurella A mop Edited August 29, 20232 yr by just
Create an account or sign in to comment