Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

The Shed End - Chelsea FC Forums

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Alejandro Garnacho

Featured Replies

32 minutes ago, 19seventyone said:

That’s more or less my thoughts. I don’t see him getting many minutes on the wing so began to think of where he could play. No 9 is a possibility I suppose.

Imagine that, £60m to shoehorn him in as a number 9, worked out well for our boy Nkunku, even better is this idea he’s going to be a forward, more central mid behind an attacker; just great, another one for the queue there then. 😅🤦‍♂️ 

Comedy of errors, all leading up to this grandiose moment of the worst transfer decision the club has ever made, on every measurable metric. 

It's our core business mission to sign every good young players out there. I mean he's a good player on occasions, but is he really better than Neto, Sancho and the long list of attackers, or maybe even Jackson and Nkunku as a Nine?

7 minutes ago, icecoolguy22 said:

It's our core business mission to sign every good young players out there. I mean he's a good player on occasions, but is he really better than Neto, Sancho and the long list of attackers, or maybe even Jackson and Nkunku as a Nine?

Next Batigol 

 

celebration gabriel GIF by nss sports

Very rare that you'll get a transfer where the fans of the selling club don't want him to go and the fans of the buying club don't want him.

If I'm looking for a positive (other than annoying Man Utd fans) is that there's certainly talent there, and United are a club where you could put almost any player in their team and they'd look average to sh*t so who knows, put him in our team and he might look a lot better.

30 minutes ago, timetowaste said:

Very rare that you'll get a transfer where the fans of the selling club don't want him to go and the fans of the buying club don't want him.

 

Oops, I read your post wrongly. I thought you wrote both fans don't want the player because Felix is an example of such player. 

Edited by Bob stark

We don’t really need another young expensive winger. We need a striker who can challenge Jackson. Can someone inform the SD’s?

31 minutes ago, Bebe1980 said:

I'd like him but I'd much prefer we put our efforts and money into getting a decent striker and goalkeeper... ::ChELSeAFaN::

Says EVERY Chelsea supporter.

Honestly, IF we sign Garnacho when the side is still crying out for a proper keeper AND a decent No.9, then this will be the most ridiculous signing in our clubs history and boy, we have made plenty of questionable ones over the years.

 

12 hours ago, SydneyChelsea said:

FBREF actually has it at 26% as of last round - look at the company he is keeping 😂 For comparison our worst winger is Neto with 35.6% dribble success...

image.png.5c01d884dee73338fa9b1678097556c4.png

 

It's possible that the board see him as a forward/striker, rather than a winger in the current system. Garnacho doesn't have a great dribbling style, he lacks close control and is often rushed in his touch so rarely keeps the ball close to his body, but he is also not particularly strong or large so cannot shield the ball physically either. The one attribute he does have is raw speed, but as we've seen with Mudryk that is pretty much useless at this level without one of the above too.

 

He is a high-energy player who could get a lot of goals if he focused on his finishing and running, but he hasn't showed that side of his game either really. 

 

I think it’s moot what the directors think if Maresca himself doesn’t see him as a striker in his own system. He’s just come out saying he’s not needed as they already have too many wingers. He’s even said George is fine with replacing Mudryk given the limited role. 
 

It’s our clown directors who are pushing this when literally no one wants him. 

17 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

I think it’s moot what the directors think if Maresca himself doesn’t see him as a striker in his own system. He’s just come out saying he’s not needed as they already have too many wingers. He’s even said George is fine with replacing Mudryk given the limited role. 
 

It’s our clown directors who are pushing this when literally no one wants him. 

And there lies the problem. You sign him against his advice and Maresca would give him the KDH, Felix treatment. Give George the mins till the summer, and upgrade the position.

39 minutes ago, Sconnie Blue said:

I think it’s moot what the directors think if Maresca himself doesn’t see him as a striker in his own system. He’s just come out saying he’s not needed as they already have too many wingers. He’s even said George is fine with replacing Mudryk given the limited role. 
 

It’s our clown directors who are pushing this when literally no one wants him. 

Agree with this except the George bit. George is so undercooked its ridiculous and potentially damaging for him. He should go out on loan. I don't think he is good enough yet for a top competing Champ team as i don't think he'd get regular minutes. Similarly a lower Champ team may be demoralizing and he also might not get minutes. I would say an above average Champ side chasing a play off spot or a top League 1 side where he would get plenty of game time in a successful side which he would benefit from. I think this was the making of Maatsen in setting him up for the next phase of his career.

Yes i agree that we don't need Garnacho, but no i don't think George is ready  for PL football yet.

1 hour ago, Sconnie Blue said:

I think it’s moot what the directors think if Maresca himself doesn’t see him as a striker in his own system. He’s just come out saying he’s not needed as they already have too many wingers. He’s even said George is fine with replacing Mudryk given the limited role. 
 

It’s our clown directors who are pushing this when literally no one wants him. 

It is ridiculous.

How did football change from the days when a manager/coach, would identify a player HE needs for the team and the club try and sign said player?

I was starting to have sympathy with Maresca for having these clowns pushing players on him until I remembered he keeps backing and playing Sanchez and Jackson so the sympathy was short lived.

 

 

Someone made an analogy the other day. You are at a restaurant and you can choose from 3 main courses. Steak, Lobster, or Dog sh*t. We will all choose the steak or lobster, but why the f**k is dog sh*t even an option?

 

The fact Garnacho is actually an option for these co-directors has permanently tarnished any remaining dignity they have left.

- Manchester United are 13th and don't want Garnacho.

- Their own fans hate Garnacho.

- Maresca has publicly said he doesn't want Garnacho.

 

The co-directors have shown they can't be trusted and they don't know what they are doing. This month alone reflects their tenure here so far. I don't trust them to lead this club for the better. They are deliberately self sabotaging. They are merely very bad scouts playing sporting director. 

2 hours ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Someone made an analogy the other day. You are at a restaurant and you can choose from 3 main courses. Steak, Lobster, or Dog sh*t. We will all choose the steak or lobster, but why the f**k is dog sh*t even an option?

 

The fact Garnacho is actually an option for these co-directors has permanently tarnished any remaining dignity they have left.

- Manchester United are 13th and don't want Garnacho.

- Their own fans hate Garnacho.

- Maresca has publicly said he doesn't want Garnacho.

 

The co-directors have shown they can't be trusted and they don't know what they are doing. This month alone reflects their tenure here so far. I don't trust them to lead this club for the better. They are deliberately self sabotaging. They are merely very bad scouts playing sporting director. 

Bang On

6 hours ago, Ukraine Bolt said:

I'm by no means a Garnacho fan but that picture does not show Willian outperforming him lol 

Depends what metric you’re prioritising there. Garnacho is a bit like Neto from the perspective of he always “looks busy” doing nothing. If footballers were dogs.

4 hours ago, Sconnie Blue said:


It’s our clown directors who are pushing this when literally no one wants him. 

Their own fans hate Garnacho

Humiliation ritual for Mount, no other explanation. PSR buddies circle jerk. Oh, we had it so good under Roman in that respect.

As for their fans, you notice the type of supporter who backs Garnacho, and the ones smiling like a cheshire cat at the idea of us taking him off their books and fuelling an Amorim rebuild are silently happy. Whereas, the very obvious ‘highlight’ reel /club merch fans seem to rate him. The ‘in-betweeners ’ are just numb from years of mediocrity, they hold on, also pride involved.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Recently Browsing 0

  • No registered users viewing this page.
Background Picker
Customize Layout

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.