If they sell, chants of Roman Abramovich should go down a treat! Not that they'll care at all, fans are zilch to this lot!

Chelsea through and through, from the academy, multiple time captain, arguably player of the season and doesn’t want to leave - and we consider selling him to Spurs to cover the cost of project players like Moreira and Gabriel? Do piss right off, some things are just completely unforgiveable

40mill to Spurs. Better not be true. Our match going fans need to make their voices heard of this. Surely almost every Chelsea fan must be against such a deal.

12 minutes ago, axman2526 said:

40mill to Spurs. Better not be true. Our match going fans need to make their voices heard of this. Surely almost every Chelsea fan must be against such a deal.

That's cheap and to a fking w*nker that would never sell to us if his life depended on it.  Just goes to show what a bunch of w*nkers these owners are if they do this.

I wouldn’t sell Tottenham a dose of the clap. Vile club vile fans there is no way Connor would go there 

17 hours ago, Modueke said:

If they sell, chants of Roman Abramovich should go down a treat! Not that they'll care at all, fans are zilch to this lot!

Would be pretty ironic if this triggers it given his/Marina's last big move on the market was selling multiple academy players to fund Lukaku.

Selling to anyone would be stupid unless it was a monster offer.

 

Selling to Spurs would be unforgivable. Gallagher is exactly the right sort of player for Postecoglu's style of play. We'd be handing them a perfect fit

1 hour ago, Argo said:

Would be pretty ironic if this triggers it given his/Marina's last big move on the market was selling multiple academy players to fund Lukaku.

Not to Tottenham

Certainly if the club were dead set selling him they’d instruct Poch not to play him? 

Paper/ agent talk to get the club to offer a contract more in keeping with what the player is wanting? He or palmer are POTS for me so far. Would be madness to give those north London Wan*ers anything other than the cold shoulder. 

According to the Daily Mail, Conor Gallagher was the PL player who conceded the most fouls in 2023 ! 

72 if you were wondering !

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-12867413/Erling-Haaland-runs-away-goals-en-route-Treble-selfless-Mo-Salah-lands-gong-Chelsea-star-committed-fouls-year-Mail-Sports-2023-Premier-League-awards.html 

18 hours ago, Sconnie Blue said:

Certainly if the club were dead set selling him they’d instruct Poch not to play him? 

Good point. There's a lot of B.S. and bluster around this situation.

On 31/12/2023 at 10:44, Sconnie Blue said:

Certainly if the club were dead set selling him they’d instruct Poch not to play him? 

 

This guy is the next Rice, maybe even Lamps. Give him time.

4 hours ago, abister1 said:

This guy is the next Rice, maybe even Lamps. Give him time.

He will never be get anywhere near Lampard's level. They aren't even the same profile of player.

8 hours ago, Scott Harris said:

He will never be get anywhere near Lampard's level. They aren't even the same profile of player.

Of course there has to be commitment and energy but sorry CG is a country mile a way from a top PL player.

People see a player running around and get drawn into a hype but he certainly isn’t even to the quality of Phillips ( when fit )  at Man City .

CG dives into to a tackle and time after time gives away free kicks in very dangerous positions.

Of course we have needed him this season but if he continues to be a first choice midfielder we will struggle to get higher in the league .

If Spurs offer decent money say north of £50 million then I would snatch their hand off.

 

12 hours ago, abister1 said:

This guy is the next Rice, maybe even Lamps. Give him time.

He has a lot of energy, sometimes uncontrolled, especially with his tackling, mostly because he's out of position. Needs to start scoring goals if you place him anywhere near Lampard and although he maybe closer to Rice, he still has a bit of a way to go yet to be a £50mill+ player

14 minutes ago, terraloon said:

Of course there has to be commitment and energy but sorry CG is a country mile a way from a top PL player.

People see a player running around and get drawn into a hype but he certainly isn’t even to the quality of Phillips ( when fit )  at Man City .

CG dives into to a tackle and time after time gives away free kicks in very dangerous positions.

Of course we have needed him this season but if he continues to be a first choice midfielder we will struggle to get higher in the league .

If Spurs offer decent money say north of £50 million then I would snatch their hand off.

 

I'd give him another season here and see how he progresses; he's been playing in the EPL for a few seasons now and IMO the progress is there but its slow and I'm not seeing much more of a player that I saw at Palace TBH.  

On 31/12/2023 at 17:43, olderschoolcfc said:

Paper/ agent talk to get the club to offer a contract more in keeping with what the player is wanting? He or palmer are POTS for me so far. Would be madness to give those north London Wan*ers anything other than the cold shoulder. 

The  Spurs link makes no sense to be honest; he isn’t starting ahead of Bissouma as an 8 or Maddison as a 10. This would be as weird as Mount going to Utd when they already Fernandes playing in his position. Even if he were up for sale, he is better off waiting till the summer to see if West Ham come back for him if they sell Paqueta or Villa if they sell Douglas Luiz.

If he was at another club our board would offer over 100 million to buy him!

I think that unfortunately, there may be some truth in the rumours that the Club MUST sell a certain number of "home grown" players, in order to comply with FFP rules. It would help massively if the Owners or their lap dogs, would explain exactly the position the Club are in. We then just might understand why they are even considering making such shocking decisions as selling Conor. I have posted elsewhere on the Forum that I will be "done" with this Club if we sell Gallagher. This is because of his LOVE for the Club, his endeavour, leadership qualities and loyalty, but to be honest, since these owners came in and f*cked things up so Royally, I haven't really felt the same about the Club or its players (Conor exempted) anyway.

3 minutes ago, coombsie said:

I think that unfortunately, there may be some truth in the rumours that the Club MUST sell a certain number of "home grown" players, in order to comply with FFP rules. It would help massively if the Owners or their lap dogs, would explain exactly the position the Club are in. We then just might understand why they are even considering making such shocking decisions as selling Conor. I have posted elsewhere on the Forum that I will be "done" with this Club if we sell Gallagher. This is because of his LOVE for the Club, his endeavour, leadership qualities and loyalty, but to be honest, since these owners came in and f*cked things up so Royally, I haven't really felt the same about the Club or its players (Conor exempted) anyway.

As I believe, with the recent sales, we are well within FFP already, so this sale would be overkill for now!

I look at players like Gilchrist and wonder whether we (well, they) are just using players like that to bring them through to sell on, without any thought of any guts to the club. The sale of Conor would confirm that!

It's a proper business now and seems to be looking to be 100% run that way without any loyalty. We were more than spoilt with Roman (God, I miss that guy)

Remember we have a good women's team to follow @coombsie, but it's probably only a matter of time before £££ gets seen there too by the board!

2 minutes ago, Modueke said:

As I believe, with the recent sales, we are well within FFP already, so this sale would be overkill for now!

I look at players like Gilchrist and wonder whether we (well, they) are just using players like that to bring them through to sell on, without any thought of any guts to the club. The sale of Conor would confirm that!

It's a proper business now and seems to be looking to be 100% run that way without any loyalty. We were more than spoilt with Roman (God, I miss that guy)

Remember we have a good women's team to follow @coombsie, but it's probably only a matter of time before £££ gets seen there too by the board!

Hasn't this been the way since Roman? Our youth team, large squad subsidised the first team? Our youth pulled in loan fees as did our extended squad? Selling to pay for first team upgrades has always been done hasn't it? Guess it's how you view Cobham. 

As for the women's game, the upside financially is there for growth over the next 20 years. Losing the games best club manager probably wasn't part of the plot but id argue CFC is incredibly well placed as the women's game develops. 

2 hours ago, terraloon said:

Of course there has to be commitment and energy but sorry CG is a country mile a way from a top PL player.

People see a player running around and get drawn into a hype but he certainly isn’t even to the quality of Phillips ( when fit )  at Man City .

CG dives into to a tackle and time after time gives away free kicks in very dangerous positions.

Of course we have needed him this season but if he continues to be a first choice midfielder we will struggle to get higher in the league .

If Spurs offer decent money say north of £50 million then I would snatch their hand off.

 

Really ffs the only player that gives a sh*t, gives 100%, runs his f**king nuts off. Tell me a better buy in the £1,000,000,000 we’ve spent who gives close to that, and you’d sell him for 50m to f**king spurs. Un f**king believable. 

1 minute ago, olderschoolcfc said:

Hasn't this been the way since Roman?

Roman wouldn't be selling our current captain and one out of a young team that actually looks capable this season. It's next-level crazy!